جستجوی مقالات مرتبط با کلیدواژه "approximation" در نشریات گروه "علوم قرآن و حدیث"

Some scholars maintain that Muslim Brotherhood and Wahhabism are two converging movements, but by examining the main works of the Brotherhood on their the beliefs, methodology and general policies, it was revealed that this idea is not valid. In this essay, with a descriptive-analytic method, it is tried to make a comparison between Muslim Brotherhood ideology and Wahhabism in four axes: 1- Monotheistic Thought, 2- Takfiri Thought, 3- Approximation Thought, 4- Political Thought. According to this comparative study, Muslim Brotherhood and Wahhabism have fundamental differences in these four axes. Since Wahhabism is an anti-approximation, takfiri, opposed to political Islam and has a different understanding of monotheism and polytheism; while by contrary Muslim Brotherhood movement is pro- approximation, anti-takfir, believing in political Islam, and believe in ideology of main stream Sunni scholars about monotheism and polytheism.

Without an iota of doubt, in the domain of unity of muslims and approximation of Muslim sects, exploring the deeds and words of prophet is the most efficient solution. From the deeds of prophet shared among all Islamic sects, it is clearly understood that the holy prophet issued several warnings about the successor- which is the most notorious point of division among Muslims. The holy prophet has shown that the path of unity and approximation is solely sought in reaching a consensus on the successor. According to this view, unity among muslims is only attained when they concur upon the principles of Imamate, and approximation is achieved only when all Islamic sects adopt a discourse relying on Imamate principle. This discourse method must open new chapters for discussions about the issue of Imamate. The first goal of adopting such a discourse has to be disclosing the truth behind the ideology of different Islamic sects and their principles. The second goal must be removing the misconceptions and misunderstanding. The most significant aim of such an approach is: to revisit the root cause of grievences, to shed light on historical and religious issues, to establish a clear margin between unity and approximation on the one hand and unity and social coexistance on the other.

The necessity of interaction and approximation between the jurisprudential opinions and theories of Islamic religions is undoubtedly one of the requirements for the strength of the world of Islam. In this paper, the jurisprudential foundations and views of Shiite and Sunni in accordance with the jurisprudential views of the Leaders of the Islamic revolution are examined and analyzed. We believe that by adopting common positions and empathy and cooperation of Islamic sects in order to create understanding and exchange of jurisprudential opinions and by imitating the way of life of the Holy Prophet and the immaculate Imams and the intentions and actions of the leaders of the Revolution, the Islamic nations once again in the shadow of religious and jurisprudential foundations and Peaceful coexistence, will regain the high peaks of their former strength and authority.

One of the hadiths narrated in the Shi'a narratives of the Imams (PBUT) about the truth of the Holy Qur'an is the hadith "All of the Qur'an is pummeling and its conscience is approximation". The study of the hadith and commentary books reveals a serious difference in the exact understanding of this hadith among the great scholars of Shias, to the extent that they reject each other. This research seeks to examine the meaning of this hadith and provide a proper understanding of it by relying on the knowledge of " Criticism of the hadith" and "understanding of the hadith" in a descriptive-analytical way. Of course, in this regard, studies about chain and narrators have also been used in accordance with the discussion. After criticizing the views expressed in this regard, the author believes that the exact understanding and correct comment, first proposed by Allamah Tabatabai in Al-Mizan commentary, is that this hadith is somehow a family of the hadiths of the appearance and conscience of the Qur'an and refers to the level of tightening and dissociation of the Holy Qur'an.

One of the main questions about the book Man La Yahdaruh al-Faqih is whether the Morsal Prophetic hadiths of the book are all obtained from the Shi`a chain of authorities and documents or some of them belong to the Sunni chain of authorities? The answer to this question requires analysis of individual narratives. To make a systematic analysis of the hadiths and obtain more accurate results, the author of the present paper first has divided the traditions into seven groups based on three criteria: hadith narrated in Sheikh Saduq’s other hadith books (through Shi`a documents or non-Shi`a ones); hadith narrated in other Shi`a hadith books through Shi`a documents; hadith narrated in the Sunni hadith books. Then he has verified the implications of each of these types of narratives whether Sheikh Saduq has utilized Shi`a chain of authorities or Sunni’s. Then he has collected hadiths belonging to each group. It is worthy of notice that the author has investigated the first volume of the above mentioned book as an example in this study.