جستجوی مقالات مرتبط با کلیدواژه "manuscript" در نشریات گروه "علوم قرآن و حدیث"

The characteristic of vocalizing the third person singular masculine pronoun hā’ with -u (ḍamma), in words that the pronoun hā is preceded by -i (kasra) or -ī (yā’) like: “'Akhīhu”, “fīhu” and also the hā’ attached to a jussive (majzūm) verbal form like: “Nu'utihu”, “Nuşlihu” is widely attested in early Qur’an manuscripts.AbstractThe characteristic of vocalizing the third person singular masculine pronoun hā’ with -u (ḍamma), in words that the pronoun hā is preceded by -i (kasra) or -ī (yā’) like: “'Akhīhu”, “fīhu” and also the hā’ attached to a jussive (majzūm) verbal form like: “Nu'utihu”, “Nuşlihu” is widely attested in early Qur’an manuscripts.AbstractThe characteristic of vocalizing the third person singular masculine pronoun hā’ with -u (ḍamma), in words that the pronoun hā is preceded by -i (kasra) or -ī (yā’) like: “'Akhīhu”, “fīhu” and also the hā’ attached to a jussive (majzūm) verbal form like: “Nu'utihu”, “Nuşlihu” is widely attested in early Qur’an manuscripts.

Understanding the efforts of thinkers in different fields plays an important role in the growth, flourishing and discovery of new issues in those sciences. One of the Muslim thinkers who played important influences in his time is Mullah Mohammad Kazem Hezar Jaribi Astarabadi. He is one of the most active scholars in the field of writing and writing on various religious subjects, especially in theology in the late Zand and early Qajar periods. Using library resources and referring to various manuscripts in a descriptive-analytical method, this research will deal with the quality of the late Hezar Jaribi's argument and testimony on religious propositions and how to respond to doubts. The findings of the research are that in his scientific activities, he tried to study extensively and deeply in religious propositions due to his attachment, love and devotion to the Imams of the Infallibles (PBUH) and also tried to write fluently. Respond to opposition attacks. The methods that he used in arguing, martyring and defending religious propositions, the most important of which are: quoting some related narrations, quoting prayers and pilgrimages, quoting the opinions of mujtahids, trusting in historical narrations and hearings. There are criticisms of the thousand-acre reasoning method; Such as not interpreting the expressions of mystics and poets and stagnating the appearance of their words, not using poetic analogy to convince readers, using unscientific methods of insulting and slandering opponents.

Misbah Al-Shariah and Miftah Al-Haghighah was first introduced by Seyyed Ibn Tawus (also Tavoos) in the 7th century (AH). The author of this book and his time of life have never been known; yet since all of the book chapters begin with the phrase “Al-Sadiq said”, it is considered as one of the works attributed to Imam Sadiq. Whether or not this attribution is correct has always been under discussion. Various quotations have been made about the author of the book too. Quantitative and qualitative content analyses on this book reveals that most of the statements which are read in this book as hadiths or narrations from people other than the infallible Imams, does not have any roots in other books and Misbah is the only source in quoting them. In addition, many of such statements mentioned in Misbah and other books have a different source of attribution. Few studies have investigated why this has occurred. Therefore, the present study has adopted a documentary method along with quantitative and qualitative content analyses covering historical, interpretive, hadith-related, and mystical sources of both Shiite and Sunni to prove this hypothesis that all the chapters of Misbah Al-Shariah may have been written or transcribed by a Sufi whom has then added the phrase “Al-Sadiq said” to the beginning of all these narratives to attribute them to Imam Sadiq: a similar event which has occurred to works such as Solami’s ‘Haghigh Al-Tafsir’.

The purpose of this text is to recognize the hadith evaluating method of the old Shiite ulama and to open window for returning toward their basic, realistic and efficient method.The author tries to verify old Shiite ulamas approach to hadith from ditterent perspectives such as recording the text, discrepancies in texts and also in one word authenticating the text.Since there is a close relation between authenticating the texts and bibliography, the author recommend the readers to read his previous article on Najashi and Tusis Fihrists.