جستجوی مقالات مرتبط با کلیدواژه « quranic sciences » در نشریات گروه « علوم قرآن و حدیث »

One of the topics raised in the knowledge of uṣūl or principles (Arabic: اصول) and studies of the Quran is “concise and explanatory” (Arabic: مجمل و مبین) which shows that some of the Quranic rhetoric need an expression to convey the divine purpose with all dimensions and aspects. Hence, there are ways to explain these concises. This article seeks to analyze and review strategies to explain the Quranic concises in the knowledge of uṣūl or principles (Arabic: اصول) and studies of the Quran by descriptive-analytical method. Examining the books of uṣūl from the past to the present shows that the knowledge of the uṣūl of the past has been better in this subject and there was a topic called “explication” (Arabic: بیان) in Usul works, which establishes a connection between explanatory with concise and it has become less prominent today. Attention in the works of uṣūl has been focused on the ways of expressing the verses and the words and actions of the Prophet(PBUH), but this circle is developed in the works of the Quran and relies on various circumstantial evidence in explaining the Quranic concises and there are many Quranic adaptations in them. The studies of the Quran and the knowledge of uṣūl or principles (Arabic: اصول) causes the growth and efficiency of each of them. It is necessary to discuss a new review and change it to “obscurity and explication” (Arabic: إجمال و بیان) and be adjusted in the fields of conceptual obscurity, applicability obscurity and practical obscurity.

Determining the direction of the language is one of the basics of interpretation. In the discussion of the language of the Qur'an, there are many issues, one of which is whether it is spoken or written. In this discussion, they are looking for the answer that the language of the Qur'an has in terms of expression and speech. The meaning of spoken language is to choose a language from the categories of speaking, induction, conversation, and performance, which takes into account the audience and expresses the sentences and phrases in each part in a connected and short way. However, in the written language, the arrangement and order of the words and arrangement of the contents are formed in the absence of the audience and the listener, and its denotative signs are linear. The effect of this discussion is in the interpretation of the Qur'an and in the discovery of knowledge and the general position of religion. In the realm of Qur'an expression, in determining the audience and the level of using evidences and evidences within the text and outside the text. Although this issue has been discussed sporadically in the introduction of many Qur'anic interpretations and sciences since the distant past, it has been raised in the form of linguistic terminology in the contemporary period, and most of the opinions have been raised on the orality of the Qur'anic text. The present research has expressed a detailed opinion about the cleverness of the language of the Qur'an and the proof of this theory by proposing theories and reasons and evaluating the views.

Sunnah and Hadith, which is considered to be one of the oldest and most practical sources in Ulum Quran (Quranic sciences), covers a wide range of usage in the works of Mohammad Hadi Ma’refat (1309-1385 AH). If we consider the Quranic sciences as all the knowledge that is in the position of better understanding of the verses of the Quran, this important Quranic scholar has used it in a proper way in his traditional and narrative interpretation, i.e. al-Tafsīr al-Atharī al-Jāmi’. On the one hand, we can see that from the very first era, the traditions are very useful in the field of discovering the concepts of Quranic sciences; And on the other hand, this source has been more or less neglected by scholars of Quranic sciences. The connection of the concepts of Quranic sciences with texts of traditions is more understandable with a broader view of the definition of Quranic sciences. In her theories of Quranic sciences, Ayatollah Ma'raf has actually turned to the serious review and application of hadiths and based them on the centrality of the Qur'an; By analyzing the concepts of Quranic sciences in the acceptable traditions of the Ahl al-Bayt (a.s.) and the Companions, he has developed theories, differentiated and explained these concepts. He starts all Quranic issues from Quran and ends with Hadith and vice versa; This hadith approach can be a terminal chapter in the issue of the place of Sunnah and Hadith from his perspective. In order to explain this issue, the present article is an example of the theories of Batn, gradual abrogation, the revelation of the Qur'an on the Laylat al-Qadr and the revelation at the time of the Prophethood, the immortality and non-distortion of the Qur'an, tradition of Jary wa taṭbīq etc. has been proposed to show that this Qur'anic scholar's reference to the Hadith is very open and can be extracted.

The present research has analyzed the collection of works of Ayatollah Ma’refat with the descriptive-analytical method and the use of library sources in order to extract the researcher's views on the most important issues of Quranic sciences. The most important finding of this research and in comparison, with other views of scholars shows that his view is more towards the hadith of Ahl al-Bayt (as). According to other words, Ayatollah Ma’refat has paid attention to the topics of Quranic sciences with the idea that he considers the Ahl al-Bayt (as) to be the authority for complete knowledge of Quranic teachings and has examined the position of these topics in his works with such a basis.He also used the farīqayn’s hadiths, so besides the hadiths of the infallible imams (as), therefore, along with the hadiths of the infallible imams, he has also used the authentic traditions of the Sunnis. Considering the emphasis of knowledge on the basis of its theories on Imamiyyah and Sunni traditions, the authors of this article have also paid attention to the hadith collections of farīqayn in their library study.

Traditions in many cases, in the position of presenting on ẓawāhir or texts of the Quranic verses, play a significant role in recognizing or explaining the concepts of the Quranic sciences of Ayatollah Ma’refat; Unlike many Quranic scholars, Ayatollah Ma’refat uses the narrations of the Sunnah of the Holy Prophet (pbuh) and the infallible imams (as) and even the Companions as evidence in the theories of Quranic sciences, especially the topics of revelation, abrogation, similar, etc. As an example, distinguishing between the beginning of the mission and the beginning of the revolution, examining the examples of gradual abrogation (in women beat's verses, prohibition of slavery, prohibition of wine) and the theory of baṭn and the non-distortion of the Qur'an, immortality, etc. As one of his interpretative sources, the traditions of the meanings of words and the occasions of revelation, are from companions with special conditions and their followers. In general, Ayatollah Ma’refat considers Sunnah and Hadith to be essential in understanding the Qur'an and believes that there are some things in the Qur'an that cannot be explained except through tradition, such as legislation that is generally stated in the Qur'an, or things like the statement of abrogating from abrogated that the Quran has not mentioned all its dimensions, angles and details, and the intellect does not lead anywhere;When faced with the concepts of Quranic sciences, he believes in the authenticity of the Quran and the authenticity of accepted traditions, which are adopted with a moderate view after revision from Shia and Sunni sources. The main reason for distinguishing him from other Qur'an scholars is this issue, which leads to the clarification of the link between the Qur'an and hadiths. One of the clear and prominent results of this research is his approximation approach in the investigations of the Quranic sciences, which is a special symbol of it in the book of al-Tafsīr al-Atharī al-Jāmi'.

One of the wide-ranging topics in the field of Quranic sciences and Quranic revelation is the discussion of the language and expression of the Quran. The present article deals with theoretical-critical aspects of the language of revelation and the meanings of ejaculation and revelation in the Holy Quran. The author's claim is to show briefly and possibly explain that according to new topics in linguistic and literary sciences, new topics and issues and dimensions can be proposed regarding the language of the Qur'an, which still or always require the necessary lexical attention. It is interpretive and theoretical. The author, with a narrative and rational method, as well as a hermeneutic and interpretive approach, deals with issues and problems and inferred from arguments and evidences. Deals with, and then in two main sections, examines the issues, meanings and different dimensions of the revelation and linguistic decline of the Qur'an verbally, semantically and theoretically, and tries to make the audience think about this by proposing theoretical and interpretive discussions. Conclude that the traditional theory of linguistic revelation, provided it is analyzed, interpreted, correct by default, and new approaches, can be accepted and used to understand new issues and remove new doubts.

All commentators of the Quran accept the role of Quranic Sciences in the production of Quranic teaching and thinking in it, as well as the rule of Reason and the benefits of reason as a tool to archive the goal or its independent benefits with a slight difference. The shortcomings and harms of the intellect in the Qur'anic sciences are ambiguous and concise in the texts of the Qur'anic scholars, and have never been studied independently and completely. In this research, descriptive-analytical method is used and the question is what are the harms of Instrumental and independent intellect in Quranic sciences based on the view of Ayatollah Javadi Amoli?
Investigations indicate the following injuries: The need to development the role of reason as a means and also the independent role of it in the field of Qur'anic sciences in "the basics of Qur'anic sciences" and "sciences that have a direct role in understanding the Qur'an";  The need to consider both intellectual and narrative resources and to avoid non-methodical excesses in them; Inadmissibility of reason in the details of religious knowledge; Difficulty in producing purely empirical proofs; Weakness of the scientific value of the combined arguments of empirical and abstract reason or purely empirical argument, compared to purely abstract arguments; The difference between scientificity and the status of certainty in different forms of non-independent intellectual; Weakness of scientism arising from the achievements of "science" (= rational confidence) in relation to the rank of "science".

In Shiite commentaries, there are recitations attributed to the Infallibles (AS) which are in the position of proving independent readings for the Infallibles (AS). The analysis of this issue is important because the prerequisite and one of the principles in the interpretation of the Qur'an is to know the correct recitation.The present article is a descriptive-analytical method of rational and narrative way and with a historical approach in response to the question of how these readings can be analyzed based on the reflection of the Qiraats of the Infallibles (AS) in Shiite interpretations up to the sixth century. In the sixth century. Majma 'al-Bayan expanded these readings by narrating about 145 recitations from previous interpretations. One of the possible factors in the frequency of these narrations was the effect of Sheikh Tusi's method of reasoning on the interpretation of Majma 'al-Bayan.  Also, the prevailing literary atmosphere in this century and the subsequent expansion of literary interpretations such as Al-Kashaf by Zamakhshari and Al-Muharrar Al-Wajiz by Ibn Atiyah Andalusi have not been unaffected by Tabarsi in this area.

The present assessment is the product of a comparative analysis to rank 46 influential quranic science sources published during the first to the contemporary centuries with a stress on determining the effectiveness coefficient of each factor in comprehensive quranic science writing and edition. A qualitative research methodology was adopted based on the coding and categorizing approaches. Data were analyzed using comparative and casual narrative technique. Transformation circumstances and requirements were observed following literature review and surveying authors, and 75 concepts were ultimately extracted. Eighteen criteria were intended as comparison indices upon open and axial coding steps were completed. In selective coding step, ten, three, and five main categories with respectively high, intermediate, and low (or ignorable) coefficients of effectiveness were extracted. Performance (score: 84), the impact of author's character and individual dignity on writhing (score: 79), and the book content (score: 73) ranked as the first three effective categories influencing comprehensive quranic science sources transformation. The first and third categories were related to the identity and the genuineness of comprehensive book text, respectively, while the second category was based on the author's internal characters. Identity and the genuineness of comprehensive quranic book text were finally intended as the most fundamental categories.

The study of the history of Quranic sciences in the contemporary period of Iran is of special importance, and knowing it can pave the way for future research in Quranic sciences in Persian. Undoubtedly, the history of the Qur'an by Dr. Ramyar and the history of the Qur'an by Dr. Hojjati have an important and influential place among the Persian books on the history of the contemporary Qur'an. Therefore, in this article, in order to understand the place of works and researches of Quranic sciences, these two books have been introduced, and they have been compared with each other in terms of structure and content. The structural and content comparison of the two books shows the superiority and characteristics of Dr. Ramyar's book on the history of the Qur'an compared to other books on the history of the Qur'an and even the history of the Qur'an by Dr. Hojjati (the last book on the history of the Qur'an to be named Book of the Year). This shows that after the book of Dr. Ramyar, the research of Quranic sciences has not progressed. These privileges include: using more resources, quoting and criticizing the views of Orientalists, summarizing the opinions and sayings of Quranic scholars, accuracy in quoting various opinions and sayings, proposing specialized and scientific topics in each subject, the existence of several tables regarding the order of the Quran

One of the important topics in the sciences of the Qur'an is the Revelation. This debate has become more and more important and popular in our age. The core of the discussion of revelation is the analysis of the relationship between God and man, but this relationship is not limited to revelation, and some other topics of the Quranic sciences are worthy of discussion from this perspective. This article argues that in addition to the revelation, other issues in the science of the Qur'an should also consider the relationship between God and man. For this purpose, various aspects of the Qur'an's revelation and descent, as well as some other topics of the Quranic sciences are discussed from another perspective. Such an attitude would be the introduction to the evolution of the Qur'an's sciences based on new perspectives in analyzing the relationship between God and man.