جستجوی مقالات مرتبط با کلیدواژه "rhetorical miracle" در نشریات گروه "علوم قرآن و حدیث"

The stability of the order of the Quran and the strength of its composition and authorship are among the miraculous aspects of the eloquence and rhetorical style of the Noble Quran. However, some Orientalists raise doubts about the grammatical and syntactical aspects of the Quranic text, questioning its authenticity and divine revelation. This study aims to analyze and critique these doubts by examining the grammatical and syntactical issues raised by Orientalists. Using a descriptive-analytical approach and adopting a critical perspective, this paper seeks to respond to Orientalist doubts put forth by scholars such as George Sale, John Burton, Noeldeke, Régis Blachère, and Abdul Fadi. The author argues for the divine origin of the Quran and defends its integrity against Orientalist criticisms. It is believed that the Quran possesses the pinnacle of eloquence and rhetoric, and the claims made by Orientalists in this regard stem from different intellectual foundations, biases, and conflicting perspectives on Islamic studies. These perspectives include considering the Quran as a human creation, its susceptibility to social influences, and its adaptation to contemporary culture. The methodological approach of these scholars in Quranic studies is often influenced by superficiality, bias, dogmatism, and a lack of precise understanding of the literary intricacies of the Quranic language or driven by opposing motivations.

 One aspect of miracle of Quran is rhetorical aspect. In theoretical text, every word is individuated; every Quran word is chosen with precision, so that, no word could be replaced with any of other words; and in the case of replacement, not only the rhetoric but also the meaning or apart of meaning will be lost. This theory is “principle of non-synonymy in Quran”; the principle denies the being of synonym word in Quran.Many of commentators believe “Makr” (guile) and “keid” (deception) are synonym.In this paper, these two words are examined.In this regard, first, the meaning of “Makr” would be examined then the meaning of “keid”; at the end, the similarity or difference between them would be clear.Whatever inferred to find the meaning of Quran wordsare the Quranic application of the words and their examples of the words in Quran. To elicit the Quranic applications of words have used the context of Quran verses. In fact, the meaning of Quran words is elicited from Quran; because perhaps a word has special meaning or concept in Quran apart from its literal, common, or traditional meanings. The major difference between these two words is“Makr” means plan to hit the opponent, and “keid” means practical action in this direction.

the aim of the present study is to study the semantics of the contrast between the words Ease and Difficulty in the Holy Quran; Because in addition to vocabulary sources, one of the best ways to know the meaning of words is to apply them semantically opposed to each other. Another way is to use the context of the verses before and after. Sometimes, from the context or meaning of the opposite word, meanings of a word are understood that are not found in any dictionary. At the same time, there is a semantic similarity between the understood meaning and the root principle of the word. The more we understand the meanings of the verses, the more we will enjoy the meanings of the verses of the Qur'an and the better we will benefit from the verses of God in our material and spiritual life. One of the most important results of this research is to realize the semantic beauties of Quranic verses along with more accurate knowledge of the meaning of these two words, familiarity with the two methods and their use, and that whenever God first mentions Yasir and then expresses difficulty, it is a kind of warning. Has given and whenever difficulty has preceded ease, it has promised and hoped that the difficulty will be removed and the opening will be achieved.

One aspect of miracle of Quran is rhetorical aspect. In theoretical text, every word is individuated; every Quran word is chosen with precision, so that, no word could be replaced with any of other words; and in the case of replacement, not only the rhetoric but also the meaning or apart of meaning will be lost. This theory is “principle of non-synonymy in Quran”; the principle denies the being of synonym word in Quran.Many of commentators believe “Makr” (guile) and “keid” (deception) are synonym.In this paper, these two words are examined.In this regard, first, the meaning of “Makr” would be examined then the meaning of “keid”; at the end, the similarity or difference between them would be clear.Whatever inferred to find the meaning of Quran wordsare the Quranic application of the words and their examples of the words in Quran. To elicit the Quranic applications of words have used the context of Quran verses. In fact, the meaning of Quran words is elicited from Quran; because perhaps a word has special meaning or concept in Quran apart from its literal, common, or traditional meanings. The major difference between these two words is“Makr” means plan to hit the opponent, and “keid” means practical action in this direction.

The Holy Qur’an is a firm document and an unchallenged miracle of the Final Divine Mission. The beauty of the verbal Revelation may be displayed in the context of the Qur’anic language, in which the external words represent the internal concepts of the verses and the rhetorical function of phrases is most precisely analyzed in the form of grammatical rules. The study of prepositions as most partial units of the Arabic grammar, that is independent along with other words, founds a delicate network inside this inimitable word. The preposition of lām is a display of a particular meaning for its own, and the substitution of prepositions is a rhetorical elegance that is not defined only in the caravan of metaphor and allusion. Here, the letters play in their own place and, if they substitute each other, they perform rhetorical task of the sentence, in order to speak of the beauties of prepositions with the help of letters and thus convey the exact message of the Qur’anic words. The recognition of the truth or the permissibility of the meanings of the letter lām and the relation of this letter with its subjects, is one of the achievements of this paper, which aims to accurate understanding of Qur’anic concepts and teachings and prove the rhetorical miracle of the Qur’an.