جستجوی مقالات مرتبط با کلیدواژه « rule of law » در نشریات گروه « علوم قرآن و حدیث »

Good governance is one of the important issues of governance that is always a subject of discussion and opinion. Implementation of this in Islamic teachings is one of the topics that needs to be discussed. Accordingly, the purpose of this article is to examine the components and characteristics of good governance from the perspective of the Qurʾān and hadiths. The current article is descriptive and analytical and has been investigated using the library method. The findings indicate that the principles of good governance in its legal sense, if it does not fully correspond with the Qurʾānic teachings, in most cases, it does not conflict with it. However, the principles of governance intended by the Qurʾān are based on the divine worldview and the goals of the Islamic government, such as the sovereignty of Almighty Allah over the world and man, and it is not only the overseer of the form of government and the planning of worldly affairs, and this is the point of distinguishing the ideal governance from the perspective of the Qurʾān and hadiths, which has led to differences in the principles of governance from the perspective of the Qurʾān and public law. Like the originality of public law, the principle of clarification and its necessity in governance can be deduced from the teachings of the Qurʾān. At the same time, the foundation of the Qurʾān's attitude towards man and his actions is based on responsibility and accountability, and from this point of view, there is a reason for accepting any kind of responsibility and accountability that is reasonable and proportionate to the authority and ability of man in the Islamic legal system. However, in the Qurʾānic view, responsibility and accountability go beyond formal responsibility and have an otherworldly and religious aspect as well.

Bankruptcy is considered as an effect and external conditions that lead to the weakening of financial flexibility. The purpose of this research is to investigate the relationship between bankruptcy and rule of law among the employees of private companies in Khorram Abad city.

In terms of the purpose of this research, it is an applied research and a survey-descriptive research. In this research, a sample of 318 employees of private companies in Khorramabad city was selected by random sampling through Cochran's formula. The data was collected through a law-abiding questionnaire in 2 sections and bankruptcy in 1 section. Content validity and reliability index was done by Cronbach's alpha method. Data were analyzed with PLS and SPSS software.

The results of the research confirm the relationship between specific rule of law (β = 0.521), general rule of law (β = 0.315) and bankruptcy. The tstatistic related to the special legal-orientation paths (t = 7.01) and the generalorientation law (t = 3.14) shows the significance of the coefficients of the paths and their relationship with the probability of bankruptcy.

Considering the negative relationship between rule of law and bankruptcy status, it can be stated that people's desire to adhere to the laws related to the company's areas leads to a decrease in the probability of bankruptcy and, as a result, a high level of financial flexibility. we witness

Political freedom is one of the key concepts of political science and one of the basic needs in civil and political law. However, numerous interpretations have been provided by scholars, philosophers, political elites, policymakers, international conventions and treaties on its dimensions and nature, which in some cases have been accompanied by serious conflicts. In the meantime, scientific and theoretical controversy has been raised, since the beginning of the Islamic Revolution, over the issue of political freedom in Iran. Recently, this controversy has been intensified, therefore, achieving a comprehensive definition of political freedom within the framework of Islamic principles by focusing on the ethics and Sira’ah of the ahl al-bayt is necessary. Therefore, this article seeks to answer the question of what are the foundations and requirements of political freedom in Imam Ali's thought and Sira’ah? The findings of this article indicate that the origin of political freedom is available in two intertwined popular and divine areas which focus on freedom of thought and expression, public participation, the rule of law, monitoring the government and freely criticizing its functioning, political tolerance, and human dignity and are among the requirements of political freedom in the thought and Sira’ah of Alawite.

The purpose of the present study is to survey the ups and downs of the process of political development in contemporary Iran with respect to the different jurisprudential views about new concepts held by jurists in the Persian constitutional period. Relying on sociological, historical, and exegetical study methods, this research seeks to answer what impact the jurisprudential views about law held by jurists in the constitutional period had on the political development of contemporary Iran. The results showed that jurists’ disagreement with the concept of law in the constitutional period led to their opposite theoretical and practical decisions due to their obligation to religious rules and the instability of peaceful talks in that time. Their opposition through jurisprudential binding Fatawas, sanctification of some acts as being religious, and negation of the counteracts had an immense effect on the political behavior of Iranians such that it caused social, political, and legal segmentation as well as violent reactions among Iranians. Such inflexible gaps in Iran during the constitutional period definitely paved the way to move toward achieving essential criteria in the process of political development.