جستجوی مقالات مرتبط با کلیدواژه "synonym" در نشریات گروه "علوم قرآن و حدیث"

This article aims to investigate the descriptive semantics of the two words "Fe’al" and "Amal", by analyzing their syntagmatic relations in a semantic domain that aims to explain their place in the Holy Quran with the axis of companionship. One of the most important ways that are of interest to literary scholars in the science of semantics today is knowing the meaning of words in terms of syntagmatic relations; that is, by placing the words together, they obtain a special meaning. For this reason, the words that are close in meaning in Qur'an follow a specific purpose being mentioned in different and special positions. Words that are common to each other in some cases and also have differences in meaning, need to be proved. This research aims to apply the descriptive-analytical method to two words "Fe’al" and "Amal" using the syntagmatic relations which have the highest frequency in the Quranic context. First, the main meaning of these two words, which is the material meaning, is discussed based on dictionary books. Then, the Quranic usage of these two words is explained. The result is that these two words in the representation of the verses do not have the same meaning, nor can they replace one another. Therefore, the word "Fe’al" in divine conceptualization refers to influencing, creating and doing something that is intense, or fast and transitory, with or without intention and plan. For this reason, in relation to companionship, the word "Fe’al" has the most companionship relationship with the word "Allah". As a result, God uses the word "Fe’al" to describe doing His work, which He does with seriousness and speed, or to show that His desire and will affect doing something, to put the doer in the center of attention. However, the conceptualization of the word "Amal" implies doing something with continuous effort and with knowledge and discretion. For this reason, it has syntagmatic relation with "faith" and "disbelief", which are expressions of the results of good or bad deeds in a continuous manner, and as a result, the divine punishment and reward to judge human acts is shown by the word "Amal".

 One aspect of miracle of Quran is rhetorical aspect. In theoretical text, every word is individuated; every Quran word is chosen with precision, so that, no word could be replaced with any of other words; and in the case of replacement, not only the rhetoric but also the meaning or apart of meaning will be lost. This theory is “principle of non-synonymy in Quran”; the principle denies the being of synonym word in Quran.Many of commentators believe “Makr” (guile) and “keid” (deception) are synonym.In this paper, these two words are examined.In this regard, first, the meaning of “Makr” would be examined then the meaning of “keid”; at the end, the similarity or difference between them would be clear.Whatever inferred to find the meaning of Quran wordsare the Quranic application of the words and their examples of the words in Quran. To elicit the Quranic applications of words have used the context of Quran verses. In fact, the meaning of Quran words is elicited from Quran; because perhaps a word has special meaning or concept in Quran apart from its literal, common, or traditional meanings. The major difference between these two words is“Makr” means plan to hit the opponent, and “keid” means practical action in this direction.

Relative synonymy is done by paying attention to the number of meanings of a linguistic unit The words "Sanah and Aaam", both of which are used in the Qur'an, seem synonymous at the beginning This article seeks to answer the semantic aspects of these two pairs of words in the verses of the Holy Quran. By referring and paying attention to the lexical books and the historical context of the verses, it became clear that these two pairs of words are each inherently used in the Qur'an in three semantic aspects. What they have in common is the real meaning (lunar calendar) and the virtual meaning (time). And the difference between them is that "Sanah" is used for both lunar and solar calendars and includes the word "Aaam" which is used only for lunar calendars. Also, these two words, according to their use in some verses, are in conflict with each other in one of their semantic aspects. "Sanah" is used for a year in which drought, severe events, and severe divine afflictions have occurred. But "Aaam" is used for a year in which there was a lot of abundance of blessings and comfort in life

Synonym is a conceptual relation which is agreed between Linguis Quran and interpretation scientist. Understanding the methods of applying syntax to interact with the type of vocabulary overlap and delineating the semantic field of syntactic vocabulary and examining its distinctions and implications is essential for a proper understanding of verse meanings.The main question of this study is: what are the forms of linguistic syntax application in the Quran? According to unity of style procedure and partialy synonym studies the Almizan  generalized views  to interpretation of  Quran verses. In this research we surveyed  the view points of allameh about synonym in Almizan based on analytical method and content description. Along with accepting the difference in the original meaning of the words, Allameh bring up the kind of relative synonym named kalmotaradef. Inspite of differences btween the emotional aspects, mutual words, scope of meaning and semantic inclusion the synonym based on the meaning of conformity in the core of semantics is a certain and imminent matter. Allameh did not considered the differences between some verses because of  the Therefore, synonymy means conformity in the main semantic core, despite the difference in the emotional aspects, is realistic in terms of the mutual terms in the scope of meaning and the inclusion of meaning in the succession and difference in the companions. clarity in their meaning. Therefore, by explaining the conceptual relations at the level of the word and with the distinction between absolute and relative equivalence, there is no absolute equivalence.

One aspect of miracle of Quran is rhetorical aspect. In theoretical text, every word is individuated; every Quran word is chosen with precision, so that, no word could be replaced with any of other words; and in the case of replacement, not only the rhetoric but also the meaning or apart of meaning will be lost. This theory is “principle of non-synonymy in Quran”; the principle denies the being of synonym word in Quran.Many of commentators believe “Makr” (guile) and “keid” (deception) are synonym.In this paper, these two words are examined.In this regard, first, the meaning of “Makr” would be examined then the meaning of “keid”; at the end, the similarity or difference between them would be clear.Whatever inferred to find the meaning of Quran wordsare the Quranic application of the words and their examples of the words in Quran. To elicit the Quranic applications of words have used the context of Quran verses. In fact, the meaning of Quran words is elicited from Quran; because perhaps a word has special meaning or concept in Quran apart from its literal, common, or traditional meanings. The major difference between these two words is“Makr” means plan to hit the opponent, and “keid” means practical action in this direction.