جستجوی مقالات مرتبط با کلیدواژه « ممکن الوجود » در نشریات گروه « علوم قرآن و حدیث »

One of the strongest argument suggested for the existence of God is argument from contingency (Borhan al-Emkan Va al-Vojoub) which is called also argument from existence (Borhan al-Vojoud) and Avecinna’s Seddighin argument. This argument has been formulated in two ways: first one relies on acceptance of the reality or existence regardless of considering it as a contingent. And second one depends on existence of contingents. In the first account, existence of necessary existence is proved by consideration of existence of reality (existence), in the second account, existence of necessary existence is established by consideration of existence of contingents. Many interpretations suggested from each of the two accounts of the argument from contingency. Some of the first accounts, depend on impossibility of circle and regress and some do not rely on. The second account of the argument from contingency has been explained in different ways. As well as Suhrawardi has special interpretation of it. One of the subjects concerning this argument is whether it is demonstration from cause to effect or from effect to cause. As well as many objections provided against this argument and Muslim thinkers have replied them. These subjects and discussions have been explained and analyzed in this article.