جستجوی مقالات مرتبط با کلیدواژه « Ul » در نشریات گروه « علوم قرآن و حدیث »

Metaphor translation and its challenges have always been among the problems of translation and religious text translation. In this paper, having taken a cognitive semantics stand into translation, the author tries to investigate which procedures- among ten procedures used by Al-Harrasi (2000)-are the most common ones in the translation of movement image schemata of Nahj-Ul-Balaghe. Moreover, how the reasons of using this (or these) procedure(s) could be examined. In addition, what the difference(s) (if any) between Persian and English translations is (are). To achieve this goal, all Movement Image Schemata Metaphors of Nahj-Ul-Balaghe are identified and the equivalents of these metaphors in the selected English and Persian texts have been analyzed. It has been observed that in all translations, either English or Persian, metaphors have been translated and in most cases, the third procedure has been used. In other words, the same rich image in Arabic text has been translated into English and Persian. When the translators don’t use this procedure, they have used a different rich image that belongs to the same image schema- forth procedure- or another metaphorical procedure. This shows that MT, if considered from a cognitive view, is not much problematic as before. Moreover, this theory can deal with the challenges and problems of the previous theories by using image schemas. In addition, the five selected translations were able to transfer the same metaphors to the target text relatively well.

As long as Shalmaghani (d. 322 AH) was a trustworthy disciple of Husein-ibn-Rooh, his book, Al-Taklif was paid attention to by Shias from the beginning, and was found in every home; but when Shalmaghani’s heretical thoughts revealed, the credibility of his book was questioned. Therefore, it was studied and endorsed by Husein-Ibn-Rooh except for a few traditions; therefore, then Shiite scholars began to discredit it, for they considered him as devoid of merit required. Having surveyed the jurisprudential works of Shiite scholars, this article shows that they had not ignored Shalmaghani’s Al-Taklif throughout their studies on Islamic jurisprudence, using it expressively with full recognition of him, at least up to the 10th century (A.H).