جستجوی مقالات مرتبط با کلیدواژه "دستگاه های اجرایی" در نشریات گروه "فلسفه و کلام"

Compliance with ethical principles in entrepreneurial behavior can be one of the important factors that provide the context for the development of ethics in work processes and business development. With the understanding of this importance, the present study was conducted with the aim of identifying and validating the effective factors of entrepreneurial behavior with an emphasis on ethical factors in the executive bodies of Golestan province.

The research method was mixed (qualitative-quantitative), in the qualitative part, the qualitative content analysis method was used with an inductive approach, and in the quantitative part, the descriptive-survey method was used. The participants in the qualitative part were university experts and professors, and in the quantitative part there were managers of Golestan province's government agencies. Sampling method was used in the targeted qualitative part of the theoretical type with 10 people and in the quantitative part it was stratified random and 280 people were selected as a statistical sample for investigation. The research data collection tool was a semi-structured interview in the qualitative part and a researcher-made questionnaire in the quantitative part. Data analysis was done in the qualitative part through open coding and in the quantitative part through exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis in Lisrel, SPSS22 software.

The findings of the qualitative section showed that 59 effective indicators on entrepreneurial behavior with an emphasis on ethical factors were identified in four factors of ethical factors in the executive bodies of Golestan province. The findings of the quantitative section also showed that the model for measuring the effective factors of entrepreneurial behavior was confirmed with an emphasis on ethical factors, and the fit indices of the model were also evaluated as appropriate.

Identifying effective ethical factors can be considered as a strategy in order to promote entrepreneurial behaviors

Obviously, obtaining the legal claims of the claimant or government apparatus of the claimant requires the submission of the necessary documents and documents to give a clear vote of authority from the competent authority, which in turn requires the important procedures of the hearing, especially the process of exchange of bills with the party to the dispute. In this case, the question arises, what are the conditions for the handling of litigation and disputes between individuals and the government, or the lawsuits and disputes of government agencies? And what are the principles behind it? In the cases and disputes of individuals with the state, the question of whether the person seeking and being heard complies with all the lawsuits brought before the Administrative Court by a single procedure and that the order in the Tribunal's case includes claims against non-governmental organizations, In this research, one can conclude that the results of this research reveal that the personality is different from each other and demands that every person is a natural and legal person of private law, and that the reader is composed of both governmental units and their agents and revolutionary institutions and institutions, and In the Tribunal's case, the reader must also include officials and NGOs. But sometimes there may be disagreements between government agencies, in which case we will examine the regulations and approvals that all disputes of executive agencies are referred to the legal assistants of the devices. Unless the cause of the problem is due to the lack of knowledge of the laws, regulations and unconditional legal principles, the issue will be resolved by agreeing on the existence of a specific ruling in the abovementioned sources, and if resolution of the dispute is not possible, The issues will be discussed and decided by a commission composed of the Legal and Legal Affairs deputies and the deputies of the Ministry of Economic Affairs and Finance of the Organization for Management and Planning of the country, and the principles governing the procedures of judicial proceedings do not address these differences.