جستجوی مقالات مرتبط با کلیدواژه "سرقت علمی" در نشریات گروه "فلسفه و کلام"

The spread and propagation of plagiarism can cause irreparable damage to the academic body of universities and the research environment of the country. The purpose of this study was to survey the relationship between awareness and knowledge, ethical perception, and the conduct of research misconduct among students.

Descriptive correlation was used as the study method and the study population was the current users of the Iranian Scientific Database. The sampling method was Simple random sampling and 344 people were selected as study sample using Cochran’s formula. The research instrument was researcher-made questionnaire which was distributed among the users of Iranian Scientific Database as a research community after confirming its validity and reliability. The data was investigated using SPSS software and the appropriate statistical methods including Pearson correlation coefficient, the descriptive statistics of mean, statistical frequency and the percentage of frequency.

It was found that users' knowledge of the examples and practices of plagiarism were moderate; however, the extent to which the samples in question were practiced was minimal. There was also a significant inverse and high relationship between students’ awareness of plagiarism and ethical perception of it and a weak and inverse relationship between students’ ethical perception of plagiarism and its conduct.

According to the results, users who know more about plagiarism are considered to have a better ethical perception and vice versa. Also, students who view plagiarism as unethical are less likely to commit it. This emphasizes the need for educational development of students by universities, research and educational institutes.

Planning for the decrease of scientific misconducts among students requires the recognition of subjects and relevant cases. The aim of the current study is determining the categories of scientific immorality among university students and categorizing them.

The current study is in the category of descriptive studies and data gathering is done using the systematic review method. The statistical population includes all research papers on Studentschr('39') academic misconducts in the databases of Scopus, Web of Science and PubMed and between their index up to the beginning of 2017 (3727 papers). Sampling was done after going through the process of: identification, screening, eligibility and included and 63 papers were selected as samples. By studing the full text of the papers, the examples were encoded and categorized into larger groups (categories). Evaluating the findings was done using the self-monitoring techniques.

The findings showed that the main examples of Studentschr('39') academic misconducts included: Plagiarism (false paraphrasing, false copying, inaccurate citation, self plagiarism, idea plagiarism, unauthorized translation, potluck paper or text, complete plagiarism, minor plagiarism) cheating (in the exam and in homework), falsification (distortion  and fabrication), unauthorized assistance (collusion and shadowing) and fraud (lying).

The categories and examples found in the research can be used to prevent studentschr('39') academic misconducts. Policies makers can use these findings to formulate and improve legal rules, approve regulations and disciplinary regulations, and provide educational strategies for prevent Studentschr('39') academic misconducts.