جستجوی مقالات مرتبط با کلیدواژه « قرآن بسندگی » در نشریات گروه « فلسفه و کلام »

Ahmad Sobhi Mansour is considered as one of the most influential contemporary Qur'anic scholars in this field, which is the main basis for his tendencies. The present article, while examining Mansouri's views on the Qur'an and the position of the tradition of the Prophet of God, provides a critical look at his views. He tries to invalidate the status of the Prophet in addition to the dignity of the Prophet, as well as the function of tradition in all religious areas, citing certain verses of the Qur'an. The adequacy of the Qur'an for the exegesis, restriction of the scope, infallibility of the mission, and the invalidity of the tradition of the Prophet of God are among the intellectual foundations of Sحیnص Mansورr that are examined in this study. After expressing some of Mansour's arguments and arguments, the authors cite Mansur's principles and opinions in the scales and finally, based on numerous verses of the Qur'an using library-based data and content analysis methods. They conclude that Mansouri's fundamental ideas and ideas in the Qur'an and the Prophet's tradition were not holistic and that he chose Quranic verses and applied his own interpretive method (Qur'an to Qur'an) and its accessories He has not paid attention to his words and in some cases has been conflicted in speech.

Although the Prophet (S) had prophesied and rejected the Quranic sufficiency from tradition before it was institutionalized by his successors of rule, with the hadith of Erika, in the last century, after many ups and downs, it was developed by two influential thinkers of the Indian subcontinent, Abdullah Chakaralvi and Khwajeh Ahmad Amritsari. Therefore, the present study has intended to evaluate the Quranic views of these two meta-continental thinkers in a descriptive-critical manner. In this regard, the findings of the study are as follows: The three arguments presented by these two thinkers in justifying their view are as follows: The Qur’an is a divine revelation, contrary to the tradition; the Prophet‘s part lies in communicating the Divine revelation only not in communicating the tradition. All religious rules ma be understood by the holy Quran and there is no need to the tradition.

The confrontation of Shi'ism with another Islamic distinction in the context of verbal discussions has more than any other topic on the subject of Imamate. Therefore, the precise and accurate foundation of Imamat's discussions and the inclusion of the gravity of these discussions on the Holy Qur'an has always been the focus of attention of the great Shi'a scholars in the fields of theology, philosophy and interpretation. In this regard, the present research, based on the phenomenological suspension method, means the seizure and suspension of any verdict on the object being studied and the mere attention to the description of what appeared in the field of consciousness, in the verse 79 of the surah of Hajar as the central verse Among the three categories of verses in this chapter, he recounts. This phenomenological study shows the unity of the narrative style governing these three categories of verses and the correspondence between their elements. Accordingly, Imamate means to form and formulate a collection and maintain its durability and survival. This meaning in all Quranic verses the word "Imam" provides a meaningful meaning in accordance with the Qur'anic status and consistent with Quranic teachings. This approach combines the meanings of the dispersed meanings of Imamate in the fields of the word, theology and the interpretation of the meaning of the discussions of the Imamate on the Holy Quran and the attention to the Imam's attributes in it, serves a wider circle of the verses and the ability to plan the subject of Imamate in the discourse of belief Shiite extraterritoriality and against the flow of Quranicity and is effective in strengthening the concepts mentioned in the Shi'a narratives around the Imamate.

Hadith، second to Quran، is considered as the second source to infer religious injunctions and religious laws of Islam. Most Muslims consider Hadith as the only way to achieve the practice of Prophet، that is، his words، deeds and accounts. Therefore، Hadith has had a basic role in the formation of Islamic tradition، so that most people believe Hadith has always had an indisputable authority. The present paper deals with the matter، using an analytical approach. Historical investigation shows that Hadith has not always enjoyed widespread and popular acceptability and authority. Some disagreements with Hadith transmission and recording، and with its application as a source to infer religious injunction have reported in old Islamic works. There have been disagreements with Hadith in 19th and 20th centuries which are not restricted to a particular geographical region.