جستجوی مقالات مرتبط با کلیدواژه "ماشین میل" در نشریات گروه "فلسفه و کلام"

In the later theory of desire, two important economies of desire can be identified according to Lacan and Deleuze; Different formulations of the expansion of desire, each of which creates special relationships with the subject and society. Deleuze, with the plan of schizoanalysis against psychoanalysis, is completely separated from the Freudian tradition and establishes a new form of the economy of desire. Against the Oedipal formulation of desire in Lacan, with continuous reference to a missing ultimate object, desire circulates in a vortex movement around an oedipal core, in Deleuze's anti-Oedipal scheme, the body becomes a desire machine. It is possible to produce and move desire in schizo and rhizomatic ways. In general, two types of economy of desire can be recognized here: interal-expansion of desire in Lacan and external- expansion of desire in Deleuze. Also, in Lacan, the concepts of lack and fantasy that organize the economy of desire, and in Deleuze, the concept of the body without organs by producing desire as force, formulate special forms of the relationship between desire and society.

Deleuze’s theory of desire is based on the concepts of positivity and creativity; in fact this theory opposes the common Freudian psychoanalytical theory of desire in which desiring functions on the basis of an initial and primordial Lost, i.e. the experience of castration and losing the Mother because of Father’s prohibiting intervention in the infant’s relation with her. Deleuze, collaborated by Felix Guattari, try to give an explanation of desire in which, satisfying the Spinozist condition of immanence, there is no external and metaphysical force such as Freudian Oedipus complex which could universalize the structure of the desire and make its realization something merely repetitive. For this purpose, they introduce the formulation of desiring-machine. The creative and contingent aspect of the function of Deleuze’s desiring-machine, contradict to the fundamental subjection of Freudian desire to some kind of universal law and coercion. Furthermore, while the main normal Subject in Freudian theory of desire is the Hysteric, in Deleuzian formulation the default structure of subjectivity is schizophrenia; in other words, while Freud thinks of schizophrenia as a disorder and a deviation from the normal state, Deleuze sees it in most accordance with the creative nature of the Being; in his thought the centrality of the Hysteric in the Freudian theory of desire is a result of applying the Oedipus model coercively. Against, for Deleuze the subject is not an already being entity; it is merely the result and residue of desiring itself.