جستجوی مقالات مرتبط با کلیدواژه « hashar » در نشریات گروه « فلسفه و کلام »

One of the important viewpoints on bodily resurrection is the theory of the uniqueness of the worldly and the hereafter body. This view includes a wide range of theologians and some scholars, and despite the differences among the supporters of it in subsisiaries, the principle of the argument, that is, the unity of the worldly and the afterlife body in the corporeal resurrection, is agreed with by them. The research method in this article is descriptive-critical. After describing and criticizing the point of view, the present article has come to the conclusion that the claim of the uniqueness of the worldly and the afterlife body is due to the existence of fundamental and methodical problems such as: the inability to correctly explain the truth of man, many intellectual limitations such as the impossibility of returing what annihilated, and many of the texts in conflict with this point of view, fail to prove their claim, i.e. the unity of the worldly and the afterlife body in the corporeal resurrection and are of no effect.

Raj`at, return, is a special religious belief of the Shia Imamiyyah. In this return, the great divine authorities, such as the Prophet of Islam, Amir al-Mu'minin and Sayyid al-Shohada, are present. The verses of the Qur'an and the noble traditions supporting the theory are discussed in this article, and the views of Muslim scholars have been taken as document and studied critically. The principle of raj`at has been accepted by most Shia scholars but there are disagreements in its details; and, as described in the paper, some interpretations have been put forward in order to abandon its common meaning. The common hypothesis refers to the return of some deads of Salih and Talih, it failes to be accepted and the theory claiming the return of Imams state during the rule of the last Imam is incompatible with the appearance and contents of the mass narratives. The findings of this study supported the original theory of return as being mysterious without justifying proofs.