جستجوی مقالات مرتبط با کلیدواژه "realm of infallibility" در نشریات گروه "فلسفه و کلام"

The infallibility of the divine prophets is one of the most important and major theological issues that the theologians of the two sects have proposed different theories regarding its nature, origin, principles, arguments and scope. Among these, the issue of the scope of the infallibility of the prophets from the perspective of the Holy Quran has been a fundamental and long-standing discussion that has been expressed through a number of theological schools, different opinions and views. In the meantime, Imami theologians have considered the realm of infallibility as maximum and other schools have mentioned different levels for it. Abu Mansour maturidi is one of the few Sunni theologians who is in agreement with the Imami Shiites and extends the scope of infallibility from considering, preserving, and communicating revelation; He considers the avoidance of sins and the attainment of obedience to be beyond, and considers it to be valid in the realm of forgetfulness and error. Although the supporters of the Maturidian school did not mention his view and chose another opinion, this view can be seen from his interpretive inferences. Using a descriptive-analytical method and using library sources, Abu Mansour Maturidi's views on the important contradictory verses of the infallibility of the prophets in the Holy Quran have been thoroughly investigated and Maturidi's justification for resolving this contradiction has been collected. The maximum realm proves the infallibility of the divine prophets from the point of view of Maturidi.

As is understood, most of our proofs for infallibility of Imam can be considered as developed forms of those suggested in first centuries. It is, therefore, necessary for us to become aware of their background. Although the first steps in using intellectual proofs can be seen in the sayings of Imams themselves and some of their companions, one never can dismiss what presented after the age of Imams. The author has mentioned thirteen proofs of that age. They seem to be different with regard to the realm of infallibility, and it is a clear evidence for Imamiyeh theologian`s high care.