جستجوی مقالات مرتبط با کلیدواژه « Critical Edition » در نشریات گروه « فلسفه و کلام »

Al-Mabda 'wa Al-Ma'ad is one of Ibn Sina's philosophical works in which many significant issues of Metaphysics and Natural philosophy are explained. It is noteworthy to say that later thinkers such as Fakhr al-Dīn al-Rāzī, Shahāb al-Dīn Suhrawardī and Naṣīr al-Dīn al-Ṭūsī have referred to this book. However this book has similarities with other Ibn Sina's works, especially Salvation (al-Najat), it contains different contents such as the perception of intelligibles, motion, the spheres and soul. These topics are definitely invaluable for further development in the history of Ibn Sina's reception. Since 1332/1953 to 1400/2021, four works were published on this books, two works included the text and the other two are Persian and French translations. In this article, having briefly introduced the book and evaluated the studies on it, it is meticulously examined the list of the MS copies of the as well as close look at fifty copies of them. Furthermore, the new detailed updated list of the work including seventy one copies has been reported in the appendix. On the basis of the current study, it’s essential to establish a critical edition of the work as well as avoiding the previous errors both in content and in methodology.

This paper evaluates editions and studies Ibn Sina's Risālah fī al-'ishq. The significance of the treatise resulted in the explanation of love from a philosophical approach on the basis of Aristotelian thought. Before Ibn Sina, there were treatises on love in a philosophical way by Plato, Plotinus, and the Ikhwân al-Safâ’ (the Brethren of Purity) which are conceptually different from what Ibn Sina discussed in his work. In this paper, the editions have been evaluated and then the quantity and quality of the manuscripts in each edition have been analyzed. The charchtristics of each study have been analyzed as follows: A) The analysis of the beginning sentences of the five editions permit us an comprehensive reading of the treatise: the words "Al-Hayyah"(Live), "Al-Muqziyyah" (Feeder), "Al-Mudabberah" (Aforethought) and "Al-Munba'eth" (Emitted), instead of the words "Al-Hessiah" (Sensual), "Al-Ma'dniyah", (Inorganic) "Al-Mudabberah" (designer) and "Al-Monilah" (Destiner), B) Analysis of the eighty copies of the manuscripts preserved in the various libraries in the world which is essential in any critical edition is an entirely new and different task that the editors of the treatise in our time relied on very few copies of the manuscripts that were locally accessible to them. C) How to select the exemplar as well as stemma codicum which is important in critical edition of the treatise. Moreover, the editorial aspects based on form and content of each edition have been evaluated – the aspects which have been regarded as a decisive role in philosophical analysis of the treatise.

Seyed Mohammad Nourbakhsh from Khorasan Qaen mystics of the ninth century AD, the Timurid period. He was a disciple of the noble and great scholar of Shia Jarjani, Fahd Ibn Ishaq solution and Khwaja Sufi disciple Khotalânî (killed 826), respectively. Including his famous disciples Muhammad Lahiji the Mafatih al-Ijaz fi Sharh Golshan Raz. Nourbakhsh and his followers spread of Shiism in the context of the rise of the Safavids in Iran played a role. He left several works, some of which has been critical edition. One of thesis Alsalkyn livelihood is based on four manuscripts and expurgate is critical edition by the author. This thesis is the question of the disciples Nourbakhsh about the difference between lawful and unlawful, and how Muslim scholars in this field, is formed. He has tried to moral and spiritual manner, with verses of the Quran and the traditions of the Prophet, and listed as Sayyid Ali Hamadani sayings and poems and anecdotes from Mystics, Khwaja Ishâq Khotalânî, Rumi and others, lawful and unlawful legal issue to aesthetics and artistically portray. The main emphasis in this paper, based on the appearance of Sharia Mostafavi and backend Sharia Mortazavi, the sum of the apparent and the hidden and the law and Path and Jurisprudence and Mysticism.

Among the works attributed to Ibn Sinā there is a treatise exclusively on logic which is composed in accordance with the two-fold logical works; this work is called 'Uyūn al-Ḥikmah which is different from Ibn Sinā's celebrated 'Uyūn al-Ḥikmah commented upon by Fakhr al-Razī. In the analysis of this work, there are diversity of instances based on which we could most probably deny its attribution to Ibn Sinā, e.g. metaphorization, signification by partial accord, signification by association, calling the subject and the predicate as the quality and the qualified, defining a proposition as "a statement capable of affirmation and denial", frequent usage of the words "conventional" and "conditional", dividing the modal propositions with considering the mode of specific possibility as the potential quality between the subject and the predicate, dividing the compound, modal propositions into uninegative and binegative, and also inspection of the fourth figure of syllogistics and its combinations. Notwithstanding the division of the propositions which is presented in a similar vein as the works composed before the seventh century, and also the natural proposition which is not included, the other evidence we have highlighted confirms the time of the composition as around the seventh century.
One of the Authors of Maqālāt al-Falsafīyyah li-Mashāhīr al-Muslimīn wa al-Naṣārā claims that this work belongs to Ibn 'Assal, but with research carried out among the encyclopedias, no such work attributed to this author is found.