جستجوی مقالات مرتبط با کلیدواژه "کرونا" در نشریات گروه "ادیان و عرفان"

In "New Disease Studies", different disciplines are combined with their own methods to provide a single framework for understanding and acting on disease. Disease studies are bilaterally related to various sciences. On the one hand, they express and critique the views of each science about the disease, and on the other hand, by trying to see from the perspective of the sick person, they propose new versions of different sciences. Following the creation and expansion of new disease studies, the re-reading of theology from the perspective of disease studies and the reproduction of disease-based theology becomes necessary. It is essential for theologians to first review and critique their theological understanding of disease in all theological fields, including Godology, anthropology, and eschatology (what I generally call "disease theology" in the article), and secondly, they need to introduce disease-based Godology, disease-based anthropology, and disease-based eschatology (what I generally call "disease-based theology" in the article). With the Corona epidemic, new disease studies need to pay more attention to the reproduction of disease theology and disease-based theology. Following the disease theology and disease-based theology in Christianity, this research has been done to eliminate this important shortcoming in Islamic theology.

Relationship with "others" is an inevitable characteristic of people regarding the human nature; hence, existence of "other" and relationship with them is not deniable. Corona disease is a debatable issue in terms of affirming the existence of "other" and confirming otherness. This disease proves the existence of "other" since the "other" is an undeniable truth that may lead to harm or benefit for people. Ethics will be meaningless in the absence of "other" as ethical concepts are manifested in relationship between man and "other." It worth noting that in terms of ethics, the notion of "other" may imply the perception of "other" or attention to her/him. Besides, other meanings may be grasped such as: selfishness, egoism, or escape from "other." What the Corona phenomena shows include proofing existence of "other" in first step and then understanding "other," paying attention to "other," and loving "other." The considerable point is that the case of escaping from "other" also occurs in favor of "other". It is because there might be pure or poor love for "other." Hence, escape from "other" can be interpreted as an escape in favor of "other" or love for "other."

The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of waiting culture education on improving the quality of life, hope and psychological well-being of students during the coronation period. The research method is quasi-experimental with pre-test-post-test design and control group. The statistical population of the study consisted of all students of Tehran Azad University (Electronic Unit and North Tehran). For this study, 60 female students were selected by available sampling method and then randomly divided into four groups of 15 people. The experimental groups were trained in the waiting culture and the control group did not receive any training. The instruments used in this study included questionnaires of hope, psychological well-being and quality of life. The results showed that waiting culture training led to a significant difference in the mean scores of the experimental groups in all three variables of quality of life, hope and psychological well-being. The above results indicate the need to pay attention to the culture of expectation in increasing the quality of life, hope and psychological well-being of students. It is suggested that the waiting culture be taught to students in the form of a workshop.