جستجوی مقالات مرتبط با کلیدواژه « قرآن » در نشریات گروه « ادیان و عرفان »

A prominent view on the semantics of ambiguous words in the Quran is the spirit of meaning theory. Initially proposed by al-Ghazālī, this theory was further defended by intellectuals such as Mullā Ṣadrā, al-Fayḍ al-Kāshānī, Imam Khomeini, and ʿAllāma Ṭabāṭabāʾī. Javadi Amoli’s works pay particular attention to this theory, applying a set of Quranic and exegetical principles to both ambiguous and unambiguous words. This article seeks to uncover the Quranic foundations of the spirit of meaning theory and analyze its implications for understanding Quranic words based on Javadi Amoli’s principles. Key principles explored include the manifestation of Quranic revelation, its gradation, universality, and perpetuity. The article examines the theory's implications in areas such as graded understanding, exegetical interpretation, applied understanding, and the rejection of figurative or metaphorical explanations of God's transmitted attributes. Using a descriptive-analytic approach, the article concludes that this theory plays a crucial role in achieving a deeper and more accurate understanding of the Quran compared to rival theories.

War and peace are fundamental concepts within human society that have long captured the interest of scholars and thinkers. Numerous definitions of these concepts exist, but religious perspectives hold particular significance as they can guide the behavior of believers. This article analyzes the logic behind the verses on war and peace in the Quran and the Old Testament, using theoretical and library-based methods to explore the subject. The primary objective of this research is to elucidate the rationale behind the verses on war and peace in the Quran and the Bible. Findings suggest that the Ten Commandments in the Bible, particularly the commandment against murder, hold fundamental significance and closely align with Quranic teachings. Additionally, the Quranic verses emphasize the importance of avoiding conflict and maintaining peace. Further analysis reveals that other parts of the Old Testament present a different perspective on war and peace compared to the Ten Commandments, and this perspective also diverges from the logic found in the Quran. Overall, it can be said that the war verses in the Old Testament tend to be more violent, absolute, and at times, perceived as immoral, with peace often aligned with the interests of the Jewish people. In contrast, the Quran emphasizes war as a means of defensive preparation and deterrence to prevent enemies from initiating conflict against Muslims, with an overarching priority on maintaining peace.

The story of being thrown into the water and saving the baby Moses (PBUH) from being killed by Pharaoh is one of the common themes of Torah and Quran. The narratives of the two books have some similarities and important differences. Using the descriptive-analytical method, this research examines the commonalities and differences, especially the role of Divine monotheism in the salvation of Moses (PBUH). The purpose of the research is to show the differences, commonalities and advantages of the Quranic and Torah narratives, the superiority and monotheism of the Quranic narratives and the humanity of the Torah narratives from the perspective of the Quran. Highlighting God's role in rescuing Moses (PBUH), the Quran shows an objective and expressive picture of monotheism in God's Lordship and invalidity of Pharaoh's claim of Lordship, but the monotheistic aspect of the Torah narrative is very weak in this incident. Contrary to the Torah, the Quran considers Moses' (PBUH) being thrown into the water, his salvation, his not drinking milk from women and his return to his mother's arms to be the plan of God alone.

Considering the central position of the holy texts in the two religions of Islam and Christianity, it is necessary to carry out comprehensive studies about the holy texts of these two great religions. In this regard, comparative studies have a special place in explaining this. Using the analytical-descriptive and critical method, this research examines the manuscripts of the New Testament and the Holy Quran and seeks to compare the validity and reliability of these two texts from the perspective of manuscript criticism. Examining the oldest manuscripts of the New Testament indicates that the New Testament underwent changes by the copyists and these changes were not simply caused by the mistakes of the copyists, and in some cases, these texts underwent changes due to the emphasis on the theological teachings disputed by the first Christians. On the other hand, there is very little difference between the manuscripts of the Holy Quran, and if we want to examine the New Testament and the Quran solely in terms of the reliability of their manuscripts, the copyists of the Quran paid much more attention and effort to preserve this book. However, the copyists of the New Testament have freely changed the text in many cases.

From a long time ago, olive has been of interest among various religions and cultures, which is used in the form of olive verses in the holy books. But the issue is that until now, no research has been done on the importance of olives, especially among different religions and beliefs. except for insufficient and very superficial research that the issue of olives is on the sidelines.In this article, an attempt has been made to pay homage to the historical position of oliveIn this research, the concept of olive in the holy texts of the Holy Quran and the Old Testament has been investigated, analyzed and compared. The purpose of this research was to express the place of olive in different religions, especially Judaism and Islam, And one of the other goals of this article has been to pull out the importance of the Olive position from the heart of history and revive it.This article deals with the comparative analysis of the concept of olive in the Holy Qur'an and the Old Testament using the analytical and descriptive method and using library sources. In this way, the verses of the Holy Quran and the Old Testament are extracted and categorized around the concept of olive. For this purpose, we will first examine and analyze the concept of olive in the Old Testament. Then we discuss about the concept of olive in the Holy Quran. After that, we compare the concept of olive in the Old Testament and the Holy Quran.The findings showed that olive among The Holy Quran and Old Testament mentioned in this article has common concepts derived from their religious beliefs; Concepts such as blessing and peace. And that the roots of olive sanctity can be tied to the most historical civilizations and cultures.

Due to the expansion of experimental sciences and the certainty of these sciences and the influx of this idea from western world to the Islamic world, one of fundamental doubts in new era is the conflict between science and Quran. The conflict between science and the Quran means that there is an apparent inconsistency between the propositions of science and the Qur'an on a single subject, although a real conflict between the Quran and science is inherently impossible. Since Islamic thinkers such as Tabatabayi and Abdoh, have tried to resolve this conflict, the present research aims to to examine, criticize and compare principles and methods of these two thinkers, with a descriptive analytical method to solve problem. In this regard, some of the views of these thinkers are: according to Tabatabai, experimental sciences cannot judge about verses related to supernatural. In the comparison between experimental sciences and the scientific verses of Qur'an, the separation between scientific certainty and non-certainty should be considered. Abdoh believes that Quran evolves in sync with human thought; therefore, it is inevitable to change some rulings due to the necessity of science; for this reason, the interpretation of some occult concepts of the Quran is allowed.

Transreligious ethics, which addresses people's intellect and conscience, is an address that recalls the expanded expression of the saying "if you have no religion, be free". The aim of the present research is to know the types of this human ethics common to all humans in the Qur'an, so that in this way, the final model of each section with the descriptions of it in the Qur'an can be extracted, and in the final step, a brief comparison with the viewpoints of seven Western philosophers and thinkers for To confirm that this model is Faradian. Due to the multifaceted nature of this article, the research method is a combination of descriptive phenomenological steps in the stage of referring to the verses of the Quran, analysis and coding of data according to the foundation's data strategy with MAXQDA software in three parts: open coding, central coding and selective coding, and the qualitative method of data analysis. It is a library in the comparison section with the viewpoints of Western thinkers. The results of the research indicate that the five main types of personal, social, family, economic and political in the Qur'anic multi-religious ethics are of interest in the selective coding section.

Some Sunni scholars, especially Wahhabis, claim that there is no reason in the Qur'an and Sunnah for the obligation to adhere to the Ahl al-Bayt (AS). (Principles of the issues of belief in the predecessor and in the beginning, Saud bin Abd al-Aziz al-Khalaf, vol. 1, p. 40) This article tries to first; By proving the Qur'an and the narrations accepted by the sects, to prove the necessity of relying on the Ahl al-Bayt (AS). And secondly; Criticize and invalidate the claim of those who consider themselves needless of the Ahl al-Bayt (AS) in understanding the teachings of their religion, citing the teachings of the Qur'an and Sunnah.

There are some similarities and differences between the stories variously narrated in the Quran and Torah. Discovering and investigating the differences between Quranic quotes and the differences between Quranic quotes and Torah quotes plays an important role in presenting a correct interpretation of these verses. The story of Abraham's guests is mentioned four times in the Qur'an and once in the Torah with some differences (such as whether the news of Isaac’s birth is prior to the news of the torment of Lot's people or vise versa, who is the audience of Isaac’s bisharah (good news), Sara's real reaction to this good news, and the reason for the fear of Hazrat Ibrahim). The Torah is in agreement with the Qur'an in some parts and contradicts in others in this topic. The Torah connotes matters such as undermining the infallibility and monotheism of the prophet and other important characters and denigrating the essence of God in its narration, as is the case in other Torah stories. Unlike the Torah, the Qur'an has outlined and explained the main story in various surahs, presenting the essence of the story, while having seemingly conflicting differences in those narrations. Comparing the Qur'an and the Torah and the interpretation of Qur’an’s story in the four surahs in this research, and listing the differences and similarities between the Qur'an and the Torah’s narration, I have presented and explained the interpretation of Qur'an’s differences in this story in the four surahs.

Judaism, one of the great divine religions in the Holy Quran, has suffered some deviations (including economic deviations) throughout history. It is necessary to study the contexts, factors of deviation and influence of Jewish rule on human societies from the perspective of the Holy Quran. Using analytical-descriptive methods and open and closed coding based on Quranic verses and valid interpretive viewpoints, this article first discusses the most important economic corruptions (such as extreme greed and avarice, hoarding, financial betrayal, prohibited transactions, stinginess, money-grubbing, breaking financial contracts and the prevalence of usury) among the Jews. Then it analyzes and describes the three factors of beliefs, ethics and behavioral habits and finds the factors of economic deviation of the Jews. Therefore, firstly, the main factor is materialism, paying attention to worldly matters, lack of real faith, polytheism and false beliefs; and secondly, whims and fancies are the most basic moral factors that cause pride, selfishness, materialism, and financial deviation for the Jews; and thirdly, behavioral habits affected by the first two factors has led to involuntary habits (such as lying, cruelty, enmity) and thus economic deviations.

A religious tradition cannot be separated from the identification of faith through the intersubjective seeking of truth and salvation. By establishing a criterion for judging the attribution of people to that religion, this provision not only protects the theological message of religion and legitimizes it, but also distinguishes religious community members from others in the social sphere. Regarding the Abrahamic scriptures, how believers envision God has had an impact on both those who are concerned with salvation and the quality of their relationships with other people. As a result of this dialectic, Abrahamic monotheism has evolved different ideas about identity and salvation over time. To understand the conceptual worldview that governs the Hebrew Bible, the New Testament, and the Qur'an, this article examines the semantic field of identity and salvation using Izutsu's semantic method. We have also discussed how salvational approaches in the hermeneutics of Abrahamic scriptures, such as the reinterpretation of Abraham's spiritual heritage, have advanced.

The discussion about the existential truth or the nature of man and his special characteristics as the best of creatures has always been the concern of Islamic and non-Islamic thinkers and researchers. The words used about the truth of human existence are different in various texts, for example, the Holy Quran used the word "nature" for the first time and spoke about the creation of man based on pure nature and institution. In Ahadin, there is also talk about nature and institution, with the difference that in Ahadin, two different views about human nature and institution are seen and it challenges the audience's mind, in one place it talks about the sinfulness of human nature and in another place about the pure nature and Malkoti speaks. Also, there are contradictions in the Torah regarding the desire for human immortality.This research, with direct reference to the Holy Qur'an, the hadiths of the Innocents: and Ahedin, aims to examine the view of the Holy Qur'an and the hadiths on the existential truth of man (nature) and compare it with the Ahedin's view in this regard. In this regard, the lexical and terminological definition of "nature" in Islamic sources and the way Ahdin views this issue as one of the non-Islamic sources have been examined.

In the process of understanding the stories of the Qur'an, sometimes an interpretive opinion, on one hand, is confirmed by the historical background of the story in Jewish or Christian sources, but on the other hand, certain Quranic expressions weaken it. In this situation, the interpreter of the Qur'an can follow a second path ; that is, to ignore the historical background of the story and to understand the narrative of the Quran independently and separately. Based on this, the interpreter of the Qur'anic stories sometimes faces two paths, i.e. to consider or to disregard background. This research analyzes four interpretation issues in which these two paths are clearly seen. These four issues include:1- Who was Abraham's sacrifice? Isaac or Ishmael?2-Were the tablets of Moses broken or not?3-Were the calf worshipers killed or not?4-Did Jonah belong to the unpunished tribe or not?The basis of the research is to remain on the historical background, unless the intention of the Qur'an is certain on a different narration. Following this rule, in the first two issues, we have preferred to preserve the background and in the next two issues, we have preferred to disregard the background.

In the narrative and exegetical sources of the parties, there are narrations that indicate the commission of a sin from Prophet Yusuf (PBUH): the narrations of the Lord's proof, the narrations of the confession of sin, and the narrations of the theft to the brothers. In these hadiths, some punishments have also been mentioned for Yusuf (PBUH). The author criticizes them in a descriptive-analytical way. The method of criticism of these narrations is as follows: examining the document, examining the text, paying attention to the narrations of a collection together, and paying attention to the conflicting narrations in the narration communities, presenting the narrations on the Qur'an, finding the roots of these narrations in the Holy Bible, and paying attention to the Israeli narrators. . From the analysis of the sources of narratives and interpretations of the parties, we realize that in relation to these traditions, we should pay attention to conflicting traditions. There are several traditions that reject the above traditions. Paying attention to conflicting traditions reveals the high role of imams in clearing doubts and defending the authority of Prophet Yusuf (PBUH). Of course, in relation to all these narrations, there are no conflicting narrations, in which case we should look for other ways to criticize them. Commentators' dealings with these narrations have sometimes been accompanied by criticism. There are many interpretations from the commentators to reject these hadiths, especially in front of those hadiths that do not have conflicting narrations in relation to them. So by examining these narrations, their weakness and fall from the level of credibility is revealed; because they are in conflict with the verses of the Qur'an, their documents are weak, and there are many and irreconcilable differences in them. They also show the role of Israeli narrators in spreading lies; because what is stated in these traditions is also in conflict with what is stated in the Bible. Therefore, these traditions are part of the Israelites that do not have roots in the Bible.

The purpose of this study is the role of self-sufficiency in social dignity from the perspective of the Qur'an and mysticism. This research is in the line of fundamental and theoretical researches. It is a qualitative research. For this purpose, first, the literature and other researches were studied and reviewed. Related documents and Islamic texts were studied, summarized and analyzed. After summarizing and analyzing, more evidence was obtained about the role of self-sufficiency in social dignity from the perspective of the Qur'an and mysticism, and then the content of verses and hadiths in this field is analyzed. After defining social dignity from the perspective of the Qur'an and mysticism, we expressed self-sufficiency and independence and the view of the Qur'an and mysticism in this regard, and the factors and consequences of self-sufficiency and economic independence in terms of the multifaceted importance of these elements and role. They were discussed in social dignity. And the way to achieve self-sufficiency is nothing but work and job creation for the young and active force of society, and in the other direction, self-sufficiency of military and scientific independence, which is more important and influential than each other, was examined. In addition to self-sufficiency and independence according to the Qur'an, self-sufficiency mentioned in mysticism in this article is practical and spiritual self-sufficiency and its role in the social dignity of the mystic. The mystic sees his social dignity drowning in spiritual independence by going through divine knowledge and practical mystical journey.

According to the Qur'an, Jesus Christ considers himself a servant of God and does not consider himself GodAnd this is while Trinitarian Christians claim that Jesus Christ claimed his divinity in the New Testament.And this issue is considered a contradiction between the Qur'an and the New Testament according to the interpretation of Trinitarian Christians.The question raised in this research is "Do the texts of the New Testament claim the divinity of Christ?" Or do they deny this issue? »The purpose of this research is to show the alignment of the Holy Quran with the New Testament in denying the divinity of Jesus Christ.In the interpretations of the Qur'an, the reference to the verses of the New Testament in the negation of the Christian divinity is clearly evident in the interpretation of the related verses of the Qur'an.The results of this research show that Jesus denied his divinity dozens of times in the Bible in different ways.and removes any doubts about this;The research method in this research is based on textual analysis and interpretation of the holy text to the holy text.

Marriage in the divine religions is not the only way to continue the survival of the human race, and these schools are looking for the spiritual excellence and progress of human beings and human society in this way. This saying will be explained more beautifully when evidence of it can be found in the texts and written pages that are considered heavenly according to the people of Sharia; found The issue that the current research is devoted to investigating - in a descriptive-analytical way - is the analysis of the category of marriage in a comparative way in the Jewish Shari'a and Imami Islam, and it was observed that there is a great similarity in the laws and traditions of Abrahamic religions regarding the rules of marriage, such as the form of marriage in Islam and the signing of the Ketubah in Judaism, which does not take place if there is no proper implementation of marriage. This research has been written using descriptive analytical method and using library resources.

Critical thinking or the method of criticism of thought is an evaluation about opinions and thoughts using intellectual sciences, for which four stages of clarifying have been listed: the meaning of words, discovering the basics, evaluating the reason after demanding it, and discovering the fallacies in the reason. In these stages, there is no emphasis on identifying the spiritual and psychological traits of people of falsity, as well as there is no emphasis on physical, terrestrial, personal and social motivations of them, however these traits and motivations play an important role in their tendency to fallacies and in discovering their fallacies. But the Holy Qur'an in dealing with false thought emphasizes on these matters, and this shows that from the perspective of the Qur'an, in order to criticize false thought and fight against it, in addition to paying attention to the intellectual and theoretical aspects of false thought, practical, moral and motivational aspects of people of falsity (paralogists) should also be considered. The purpose of the Qur'an in paying attention to these aspects is to reveal the personality of falsity people and their hidden goals which covered by the beautiful and deceptive appearances. So, in this way, the incorrectness of their thinking will be revealed and its influence on others will be prevented. In order to eliminate the defect existing in the rational method of critical thinking and to complete its topics, In this article, which is presented in a descriptive-analytical form, the method of the Qur'an in criticizing the false thought is examined.