جستجوی مقالات مرتبط با کلیدواژه « symbolic » در نشریات گروه « ادیان و عرفان »

The return of Jesus is one of the issues that will be realized when the advent of Hazrat Mahdi.This belief is one of the most important issues in the discussion of Mahdaviat Many documents have been presented on it, including the Qur'an, the narration and the events of Muslims and Christians. The symbolic view of the return of Jesus is a new view that has been put forward by some thinkers and they consider the return not as a true meaning and reality that will be realized but as a symbol and symbol of the victory of truth over falsehood and implementation of Christian methods and characteristics in society. It flows and flows. Because the issue of the descent of Jesus is one of the important issues of Mahdaviat and the belief of a large number of Muslims and Christians. Also, no research has been organized in this field so far and an epistemological gap is evident in this field. Therefore, research on this issue is necessary. Leading research has been done descriptively-analytically and in a library method to explain symbolism in the descent of Jesus. The various Qur'anic arguments, the narration and the consensus of Muslims and Christians reject the view of symbolism according to the basic principle in any word that is true.

Language of religion is of the most demanding issues in philosophy of religion and theological discussions in this regard. Statements by researchers in language, religion, theology and theological are of two types, the general and the specific. The general account holds that these statements are general to theological and kalam issues and includes all religious texts. Meanwhile the specific accounts, is the language that only concerns the names and attributes of God and that those God’s attributes which are similar to human. In both approaches, perspectives and different findings from the past to the present period can be found in the thoughts of theologians and the kalam religious scholars and philosophers of religion. Considering all this language as the symbolic representation is one of the main theological propositions, and one of those views. According to this first approach, the issue of Mahdaviyyat and Muslim religious texts with messianic teachings and apocalypse, especially the symptoms of emergence can be considered as a field inside the language of religion. In this paper, with a descriptive and analytical approach, we are seeking a response to this question, that by accepting the latter view, what interpretations we can get from statements related to the symptoms of emergence of Mahdi? Are they just symbolic or non-symbolic? And if they are realistic and for our knowledge, are they by no means symbolic or considered so? And if so, what kind of symbol is concerned here? The icon and the symbol which is now defined in the philosophy of religion and among Western thinkers, or another alternative model can be the case?

Among symptoms and signs of the End of Times, the discussion about Antichrist is one of the most controversial issues in the narrative of the two sects. Among the personal and surrounding characteristics of Antichrist, being symbolic or real is one of the most challenging issues regarding the Antichrist. The paper reviews the claims of both positions, and finds that although none of the arguments, either of the views of proponents or opponents of the reality view of Antichrist are untenable; on the other hand, some of the reasons proponents bring for reality of the antichrist are unwarranted. However, many of the reasons that opponents have offered to show Antichrist is only a symbolic character are in fact better matched with the known characteristics of the antichrist.