جستجوی مقالات مرتبط با کلیدواژه "حقوق رومی ژرمنی" در نشریات گروه "فقه و حقوق"

One of the important tools of any government in implementing the law is the police of that country, and the use and use of firearms by them is also prescribed in this regard. In our country, both the organizations of the armed forces, especially the Naja, and the judicial system alternately witness the issue of complaints against police officers for using weapons against citizens, therefore, drafting a suitable law that, while considering this legal authority for the police, will prevent the emergence of Preventing various injuries that may occur due to the use of this tool is one of the most important concerns of legislators in different countries, including Iran. Since the methods, conditions, people and legal responsibilities of police officers in legal systems are different in this regard, comparing and using the experiences of the advanced countries of Roman Germany and other countries can improve the way of using weapons. by the police and the reduction of life and financial damages caused by it was effective and helped our country in formulating a comprehensive law in this field that is free of any problems and defects. Therefore, in this research, in the comparative method and library study, the investigation and comparison of Roman German legal systems, common law, international law in the field of using firearms by the police, and while adapting it to Iranian police laws, the problems And the ambiguities that exist in the regulations of our country have been criticized and it was concluded that both in the training of police forces and in the drafting of the comprehensive law on the use of weapons, a general review with a new attitude is inevitable.

The swift trend of globalization has left its impression on comparative legal studies. A first prerequisite of a comparative study is identification of related conceptions related to a topic which is subject to comparative studies in several legal systems. The first step for any comparative study in the realm of civil liability law, Tort law, and the ḍamān-oriented Fiqh and Islamic law is the comparative identification of the three conceptions of ḍamān, civil liability, and Tort. It is significant because our current Iranian law literature is not that transparent in this regard, leading to inexact and imprecise uses of these terminologies. The present paper deals with each of these three terminologies in their genuine contexts of origination, followed by a mainly conceptual comparison, leading particularly to conceptual relations of ḍamān, itself a sophisticated term in the Islamic Fiqh and law, in contrast to its synonymous terminologies in the other two legal systems.