جستجوی مقالات مرتبط با کلیدواژه "معاملات دولتی" در نشریات گروه "فقه و حقوق"

This study seeks to examine the pathology of preventive strategies in the field of public procurement in the Iranian legal system. Situational prevention seeks to understand the place, time, and manner of committing a crime. In situation prevention, we seek to change environments that host criminal behaviors so that these environments are less desirable for criminals. Given that public procurement still have the highest level of corruption, both in terms of quantity and price, it is important to examine how they are implemented and the effectiveness of anti-corruption policies in the area of public procurement. Descriptive-analytical research methods and tools are library information collection. The results of the research show that the situation prevention strategy based on the three theories of rational choice, daily activity and crime pattern, is very helpful due to victim-contentedness and focus on improving the environment in the fight against corruption in government transactions. In Iran, the use of situational prevention policy has recently been pursued more seriously by the legislature. However, an important part of the anti-corruption laws in government transactions in the field of prevention is a very old situation and needs to be revised. Some areas of situational prevention, such as transparency and soundness of government transactions in Iran, have major shortcomings.

By joining to “UN Convention against Corruption”, Iran has obliged to improve the competition in the government procurement regulations. Nonetheless, the Iranian regulations on government procurement have not yet been challenged.
In the current essay, first, researcher through the competitive study of “UNCITRAL Model Law on Public Procurement (2011)” and “WTO Agreement on Government Procurement (2012)” which are significant samples of international practices in public procurement, presents the factual global standards for government procurements. Then, after comparing them with “Iranian Tendering Act” and relevant directives, the researcher has gotten the point that Iranian regulations require improvements although there are some positive aspects. These modifications consist of some literal changes on the titles, subjective attitude to government procurements, inclusion of service purchases, considering the intellectual property rights and excluding continues and previous purchases from the procedures aiming to increase the competition grounds and harmonise with international standards while giving a solution to the current necessities of the country.

The public contract in the Iranian law is kind of formation contract that subject project tender law (was passed in open session on Tuesday 25,01,1383 passed by the house with amendments and Guardian council), according to this law government administrative is obligated to put their work out to contract by tender. In this law a bid is the competitive process to provide the desired quality (according to tender documents), in which the transaction subject the obligation the lowest price offered is appropriate, be delegated. Government official had to performance this process when they need to contract with their contractors. Completion is keystone of public contract and must be open and transparent. In the competition process government administrators to be able to procure their goods and services in best quality and best price. This article is discussed about the competition and its efficiency to public contract process.

Public transactions are one of main ways of spending public budget and hence are one of legal means for committing economic corruption; accordingly governing a legal mechanism on them is necessary. Current laws in curbing corruption in public transactions are not up-to-date and efficient yet and are facing with flaws which cause the possibility of committing corruption through them. Organization of Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) in years of studying its members laws on domestic public transactions has provided recommendations for amendment of their laws which also could be useful for legal amendments in Iran. Using a descriptive-analytical method, this article has recognized such flaws in quintuple steps of public transactions (including assessment of necessities, pre-bidding and bidding, conclusion of contracts, implementation of contracts and final audit) in the light of OECD recommendations and has recommended enactment of an exhaustive criminal Act in this field and amendment of current laws on tenders and auctions for curbing corruption.