جستجوی مقالات مرتبط با کلیدواژه "نظام قضایی ایران" در نشریات گروه "فقه و حقوق"

The use of a comprehensive title determines a new criminal description for some former criminal titles. This causes a large part of the crimes to have multiple criminal titles and the spiritual multiplicity of the crime is formed in an illogical and unacceptable structure, with this description of the criminalization of comprehensive titles that includes a set of behaviors that face multiple legal challenges. Such as violating the principle of legality of crime and punishment and entrusting criminalization to the judicial authorities, creating a secondary title in many crimes and the wide spiritual multiplicity of crimes, it will bring anxiety and confusion to judges and people in the society and many other negative effects. The transparency of the law and the granting of the authority to criminalize and determine criminal behavior to certain judicial authorities based on the rights of individuals and violating the rule of unspeakable ugliness causes the respect and status of laws in the society to be distorted. Maximum criminalization and criminal inflation are other consequences that pervasive crimes bring with them. Headings such as disorderly conduct, behavior contrary to public modesty, corruption in the world with hidden examples, behavior against trade unions such as clergy and the like are examples of this type of crime in Iran's criminal laws. Therefore, in this research, an attempt has been made, while stating the examples of widespread crimes in Iran's laws, its effects and consequences are investigated in a descriptive-analytical way, in order to provide a suitable platform for more complete research, and to provide the opinion of legislators and experts. Refer to the shortcomings of the law in this case.

Principles governing restorative justice and criminal mediation as new principles in restorative criminal justice, officially entered the realm of legislative criminal policy in 2002 with the adoption of the UN Economic and Social Council resolution. One of the criminal cases in the family court is custody, which requires criminal mediation in the custody institution in order to protect the foundation of the family and the parent-child relationship, with emphasis on the said resolution. In this regard, recognizing the principles of criminal mediation and observing them will lead to a significant reduction in the volume of incoming cases to the courts. This research has been written with the aim of policy-making by collecting information in a documentary method in a descriptive-analytical method. Finally, according to the principle of reducing criminal intervention in the field of family, a text can be proposed as a legal provision: Respect for the interests of children in custody is mandatory: the principle of referring family disputes to restorative processes at all stages of criminal proceedings, the principle of admission of guilt, the principle of prohibition of invoking the defendant's statements, the principle of mutual agreement, the principle of validity of agreements, the principle of immediate intervention, "The principle of neutrality and the principle of collective responsibility, the principle of the right to express the opinion of children in custody."

The Special police for children and adolescents, as one of the special institutions of the juvenile justice system, was first considered in the Juvenile Delinquency Bill (1383) and then the legislator paid attention to it in the Criminal Procedure Code of 1392 in Article 31. According to this article, the police organization was ordered to form a police section for children and adolescents. In this study, in order to achieve the hidden angles of the role of the police in juvenile justice, an attempt has been made to explain the preventive position of the juvenile police in order to answer the question: what is the role of the juvenile police in the Iranian judiciary in crime prevention? The results of this study indicate that the behavior and approach of the Iranian police towards children and adolescents does not have a differential criminal policy and in dealing with children and adolescents, adult criminal policy is used. Therefore, it is necessary for the police to try to improve the process of intervening in the proceedings of children and adolescents by formulating a differential criminal policy based on protective and not criminal intervention in compliance with national and international principles and standards.

Advances in the humanities have led to a shift in attitudes toward children and the issuance of the Convention on the Rights of the Child (1989. Social activists to reduce the negative consequences of divorce on children and their better adjustment after their parental divorce, have been wanted to change family law to provide children's participation in any judicial proceedings (such as custody and access disputes) to express their views about decisions affecting their lives and well-being. In this article we analyses with content method, Iranian family law statement, to extract capacity of children's legal right to decision- making in custody disputes. The findings show, three dimensions of approach in children's right and participation are identified: rights approach, best interests approach and mixed approach .The rights approach focuses on fundamentally rights such as: equality, dignity thus emphasis on the right of the child to be heard .the second approach seem to have negative views about children's right to participation because involving children in parental fighting, are very harmful. While the third approach states, it is necessary children's voice to be heard, as the same time emphasis on child protection. The paper notes, that under Iranian law, children's views are sometimes absent in decision- making particularly in custody litigation.

After Punitive, Rehabilitative and Restorative models in the criminal justice system, recently a “worldwide trend” has been established in the judicial system of common law towards the use of more optimal and comprehensive methods, which has been respectively called “the Comprehensive Law Movement” in the USA and “Non-adversarial Justice” in the Australia. Accordingly, “Problem-Solving” or “Collaborative Justice” courts with reparative-therapeutic approach was established to address the underlying legal problems of defendant/offender. With a comprehensive look at the offender, victim and community, simultaneously use of therapeutic and community-based methods and mentioned triple models and without withdrawal traditional sanctions, these courts are trying to addressing defendants’ social, psychological, medical, and economic underlying problems. Meanwhile they seek to achieve the main purpose of the criminal justice system –crime prevention and rehabilitation of offenders- through minimizing the damages caused by laws, legal rules, legal procedures, legal roles and judicial practices. To increase the effectiveness of decisions, orders and verdicts, some criminal justice systems like Iran while keep traditional structures of present criminal courts and without using the specialized problem-solving courts has transferred some of the problem-solving principles directly to their laws or indirectly to their judicial practicies. This paper By using content analysis, analytical and descriptive method and library resources is trying to extract common principles of problem-solving courts and analyze the legal potentials of problem-solving in Iranian judicial system through a comparative study with Common Law System.