جستجوی مقالات مرتبط با کلیدواژه « Division » در نشریات گروه « فقه و حقوق »

Although the Civil Code deals with the sale of common property in only one article, in a concise form from which no general rule can be deduced, in the two laws of civil affairs and the division and sale of common property, the legislature preceded The revolution has explained the rules of the sale of common property in detail. On this basis, some believe that recent laws have removed the conciseness of civil law on the subject. The jurisprudence is of the same opinion and now assigns lawsuits related to the sale of communal property by those two laws. But the ambiguity started when the jurists of the Guardian Council, after consulting them, applied some articles of the law and the division and sale of common property and related regulations in the assumption that not all partners are satisfied with the division, is against the Sharia and Declared invalid. Controversy in that theory shows that the jurists of the Guardian Council, contrary to the judicial procedure and what is stated in those two laws, to legislate the sale of common property, do not consider it sufficient to justify the indivisibility of property, but in their opinion, In addition to the above condition, it is also necessary to establish the two elements of loss and refusal of the partners.

Separation, one of the branches of division, is among the cases considered as the dissolution cause of diffusion. Accordingly, each partner will take the possession of a certain part of property and will own it. Concerning the distribution of diffusion properties, some significant issues can be raised, among which the separation nature, the competent authority for separation, and decision-making about the request for separation of common property are prominent. There is no legal provision concerning the separation nature. Besides, there is a disagreement between jurists and lawyers. However, it seems that its nature is considered as a contract. From ownership viewpoint of property by individuals and its legal facets, all properties are divided into the common and exclusive properties. Yet, the methods of dividing common and exclusive properties are different. Diffusion in ownership may be voluntary or forced. It is noteworthy that that due to various issues on ownership in common property, individuals do not want to share property with others, and thereby, the division of common property rises. Competent authorities should be examined for distribution and allocation of common property and its formalities that is sometimes court and Real State Registry Office. In this study, the allocation of common property and its relevant procedure are analyzed as well as the other related issues

Subject: Dispute and indivisible verdict with an overview on Judicial precedent Abstract: In the Iranian legal system, like any other legal system, a dispute has many varied divisions. Division of disputes could include financial and non-financial, in personam (Personal action) and in rem, ancillary and the main, intial and appeal and movable and immovable property disputes.Among other divisions, disputes are divided into divisible dispute and indivisible dispute, which in some cases overshadows other divisions as well. In Iranian Law, similar to French law, extension of dispute’s effect to a third party in an indivisible dispute is considered, but unlike the French law, the extension takes place upon issuance of the verdict, while in French law, extension’s effect would appear upon filing the claim and each of these two requires separate requirements. In other words, in Iranian law, there is a theory and hypothesis concerning extension of the effects upon issuance of the verdict to the persons against whom an indivisible claim has been filed. This is an issue that in French law raises the need for the presence of stakeholders in the proceedings. This research which has been conducted in the form of library and field (Review of some court verdicts) study, seeks to introduce such disputes with the aim of providing a practical and/or legislative solution to eliminate the resulted obstacles and problems together with the various interpretations that lead to adoption of various procedures.Keywords: Dispute, Verdict, Division, Extension, Profit

Dissemination in common ownership and property division is subject to the rules and regulations which the legislature has observed in order to ensure the health of people's financial and transactional relations. Dissemination in ownership occurs in cases without the individuals’ will and sometimes with their motivation.In this investigation, all articles published up to the winter 2021 in Persian in distribution in ownership and division of common property were reviewed. These articles by searching databases, Law Quarterly, Iranian Scientific Journal, sid.ir, Jurisprudence and Law Quarterly and Civilica Publications, Private Law Research Quarterly, using keywords such as division, common property, common ownership, division ownership have been obtained. It has also been derived from prominent scientific journals from the above-mentioned articles and websites.Due to the common property, object or benefit or religion or similar or trustee property, the legislator has in the first place permitted the partners to make the division as they wish by consensus and agreement between them and if no agreement is reached, the split applicant can want the partners’ obligations to conduct division.Based on the research and division law and sale of common property approved in 1978, the competent authority to request the division of registered properties is the local registration office in which the property is located..

The criminal liability of a trading company has its ups and downs from the time it is recognized as a legal entity until its death and final dissolution, which must be considered; The findings of this study show that criminal liability for participation is about to be established and will not be established in the Companies Registration Office before its registration. Also, the criminal liability of companies during their economic life will vary depending on whether they are involved in the process of merger, dissolution and transformation. Multilateral mergers and general disintegrations, depending on the case, are among the reasons for the termination of criminal liability. However, the transformation of one company into another, despite the transformation in the body, does not affect criminal liability. The revival of the company is also one of the causes of the decline of criminal responsibility. Criminal liability of legal persons is the intersection of the foundations of civil law, administrative law, criminal law and corporate law. In fact, the concept of criminal liability of a legal person is at the crossroads of legal sciences, and neglecting any of them can have harmful effects and mislead the judiciary through justice.

Equity firms have been emerging economically more than other firms in the legal and economic areas. Given the fact that the majority of the people in the society can be regarded as the members of these firms in various ways, they have enjoyed great satisfaction with the majority of the people. The present study aims to evaluate the minority shareholder's rights in the context of the decomposition of joint stock firms, as well as the related effects and judgments in the legal system of Iran and England. The study of the two legal systems indicates that, unlike English law, there is no specific provision regarding the decomposition of commercial enterprises, especially non-governmental organizations. In addition, based on English law, there are appropriate provisions for protecting minority shareholders, particularly in the case of corporate analysis. However, as far as Iran law is concerned, there are a few provisions in favor of a minority shareholder and the necessary support for a minority shareholder has been considered in the trade bill.
Therefore, comparing the laws and regulations of the two countries can lead to many challenges and ambiguities in mergers and divisions of joint stock companies

Division that is one the ways of dissolution of legal partnership is separation of shares of each party in the joint property by compromise or court order. Among the ways of dissolution of legal partnership, division of the company’s property is very important, since there are many issues about it left unsaid in the civil code. One of these issues is the nature of division which is left vague and has led to different jurisprudential and legal ideas about it. Certainly offering a coherent theory and determining the legal nature of division has many results including entailing the consequences of the accepted nature and refusal of the consequences of other similar legal institutions. The present paper tries to clear the ambiguities and answer these questions that what is the nature of division of the properties of company? Whether it is a bilateral or unilateral contract? Whether rescission or defect option is possible if a defect occurs in division? To achieve the above mentioned aims, at first the jurisprudential and legal ideas are discussed and eventually the idea that conforms to the legal system is offered.