جستجوی مقالات مرتبط با کلیدواژه « Response » در نشریات گروه « فقه و حقوق »

By the end of 2020, the unknown and contagious COVID-19 virus had spread across the globe. Failure to follow health instructions and the ambiguity of the nature of the virus caused it to infect every single citizen in a short period of time and even lead to the death of vulnerable people. Nearly two years of experience in medical research and humanities findings show that in addition to the measures of government institutions, it is the people and civil society who can be very effective in breaking the chain of transmission, and with self-care, social oversight and collective responsibility Manage. However, improper performance of people in observing the necessary health instructions and care can, in addition to the criminal title of threat to public health (subject of Article 688 of the Islamic Penal Code adopted in 1375) and also the Act on the prevention of sexually transmitted diseases and infectious diseases approved in 1320, in some cases lead to death, disability, or benefit of other persons. It also leads to intentional, quasi-intentional or pure error, depending on the case. Government criminal policy by legislative, judicial, and executive methods alone is not effective in counteracting such criminal titles, and the components of participatory (comprehensive) criminal policy need to be expanded. In fact, the purpose of this study, which has been written in an analytical and descriptive way, is to find a significant answer to the question of the effectiveness and ineffectiveness of participatory criminal policy in controlling and combating the virus.  Participation as an effective and efficient method in today's difficult campaigns such as Corona.  As a rule, the hypothesis of this research that the effectiveness of these components has been proved in the following and can be implemented by taking measures at different levels of government and people. Therefore, the application of this research can be hoped to eliminate the damage of Covid virus 19 and prevent, control and deal with its spread and contagion.

Legal criminology is a practical field of criminology that analyzes the technical aspects of criminal law institutions and suggests alternative solutions. The urban planning and management system is an important institution in the country's overall structure, and crimes related to urban planning are of great significance due to the role of this area in the lives of the population living in cities. However, despite its importance, no study has examined the system's structure from a criminological perspective. Only a few studies have focused on analyzing corruption in urban planning, while other relevant crimes have been ignored. This research aims to examine and analyze the structure of urban planning from a criminological standpoint, using a descriptive-analytical approach. The urban planning system is a complex combination of various rules, regulations, and participants, making it difficult to analyze. The most significant factors contributing to the development of crime in the urban planning system are its governmental structure and the diversity of actors in the field. The financial structure of the urban planning system, coupled with its dependence on income from crime and violations, has led to the commission of numerous offenses and crimes that involve coordination between the offenders and the government and public elements of the structure. The enactment of legislation plays a crucial role in the creation of crime within urban planning structures. The current situation, which involves a scattered set of criminal regulations, confusion in criminalization and prosecution, and inadequate deterrents for criminal responses, results in significant consequences

Globalization and emergence of global governance have changed the traditional structures of international law. As the result of a gradual undermining of the border between the domestic and international law and the expansion of interaction between global actors, having the mechanisms to manage them is necessary, mechanisms which create global administrative law. One of the important purposes of this new order is to increase the accountability of international organizations to external stakeholders, especially people and civil Society. Accountability as a new concept, has conjoint components ie participation, transparency, complaint. Application of these elements in international organizations system will increase the legitimacy of these actors.The question is, what is the practical status of accountability in international organizations? To answer this question, at first the article to describe the concept of accountability using the descriptive method, and then with analytical method and by virtue of the practice of some international organizations evaluate the status of accountability`s elements. The article finds that under pressure of public opinion and growth of the rule of law in international law, accountability have been applied sporadically in some international organizations but its integrated implementation international organizations, the strengthening of global administrative law is an undeniable necessity.

Models of response to children unlawful behaviors are grouped into five categories, penal justice, welfare, restorative, minimum intervention, and risk management. Each of these models attempts to correct delinquent children in a different way and with varying degrees of impact, and non-punishment or mild punishment may lead to further correction of delinquent children in certain offenses. This study aimed to compare the extent and manner of application of the Minimum Intervention Model with other models in Shahid Fahmideh Judicial Complex of Tehran. It was performed through the explanatory content analysis method and the statistical population consisted of 100 cases selected from two branches of this complex using the purposive non-probability sampling method. After the data were collected, they were analyzed in SPSS, and the percentages of frequency were as follows: 20% of the cases were not responded due to order for suspension of prosecution and 76% of the cases had at least one of the intervention indicators in addition to other response models. Findings indicated that the judges of this complex used the Minimum Intervention Model more than other models. Although the use of this model in the area of criminal justice for children and adolescents is a positive action, it must be adjusted in some offenses.