جستجوی مقالات مرتبط با کلیدواژه "انعطاف ناپذیری روان شناختی" در نشریات گروه "روانشناسی"

This study aimed to investigate the relationship between parenting styles and adolescent’s depression symptoms, with psychological inflexibility as a mediator. The research method was descriptive correlational. The statistical population consisted of all teenagers of Kermanshah city. 308 teenagers were selected by cluster random sampling. The instruments used included the Kovacs Depression Questionnaires, Baumrind Parenting Styles, and measures of avoidance and fusion. To analyze the data Pearson correlation and structural equation modeling (SEM) were conducted. The results indicated that the authoritarian parenting style was directly associated with depression symptoms, while authoritative and permissive parenting styles were indirectly linked to depression symptoms through psychological inflexibility. Additionally, psychological inflexibility was found to have a direct influence on depression symptoms. Further analysis revealed a significant relationship between authoritative and permissive parenting styles and depression symptoms, mediated by psychological inflexibility. Based on these findings, it is recommended that the relationship between parenting styles, psychological inflexibility, and depression symptoms be considered in interventions targeting adolescent mental health.

Antisocial personality has increased dramatically worldwide. Several causative factors exist for developing an antisocial personality, most rooted in the individual's past. The present study aimed to model structural equations for antisocial personality traits with particular reference to adverse childhood experiences and psychological inflexibility.

The statistical population of this study included all individuals who turned to health centers in Hamedan during the six months of 2021 and 2022, of which 361 individuals were selected using convenience sampling. The instruments used were the Adverse Childhood Experiences Questionnaire, the Psychological Inflexibility Questionnaire, and the Norm Deviation Questionnaire. The method of data analysis was performed using Amos and structural equations, specifically the bootstrapping method.

The obtained results indicated that adverse childhood experiences and psychological inflexibility were significantly and directly related to antisocial personality traits (P<0.01). In addition, adverse childhood experiences were related to antisocial personality traits via psychological inflexibility (P<0.01). Structural equation analysis for the relationships between indicators revealed that the direct effect of adverse and inflexible psychological experiences on antisocial personality traits was 0.44 and 0.35, respectively, and the indirect effect of adverse childhood experiences on antisocial personality traits was 0.26.

According to the findings, this study concluded that the model of adverse childhood experiences predicts antisocial personality with a mediating role of psychological inflexibility. Therefore, providing treatments that increase psychological flexibility (e.g., treatments based on acceptance and commitment) may reduce antisocial personality symptoms.

The purpose of this study was to investigate the role of psychological inflexibility and emotion dysregulation in predicting intensity of anger in competitive athletes.

This was a descriptive and correlational research. The statistical population of this study consisted of all competitive athletes (all athletes who participated in any level of competitive sport, either individual or collective) in city of Ardebil in 2019. From a total of participants, 312 were selected through cluster sampling to be included in the study. To collect data, the Clinical Anger Scale (Snell et al , 1995), Comprehensive assessment of Acceptance and Commitment Therapy (Comp ACT) Scale (Francis et al, 2016) and Emotion Dysregulation Scale (Gratz, & Roemer, 2004) were used. Data analysis was done through Pearson correlation and Multiple Linear regression formula.

The results of multiple regression analysis also showed that 38% of variance of intensity of anger is explained by components of psychological inflexibility and emotion dysregulation variables. There was also a significant positive relationship between psychological inflexibility and emotion dysregulation with intensity of anger (P<0/05).

Based on the findings, it can probably be said that athletes who are not capable of emotion regulation and are not capable of flexible behaviors in competitive situations, experience more anger.