جستجوی مقالات مرتبط با کلیدواژه « dialectical behavior therapy » در نشریات گروه « روانشناسی »

Binge-eating disorder (BED) is a serious mental health condition characterized by recurrent episodes of consuming large quantities of food in a short period, accompanied by feelings of loss of control. Individuals with BED often experience negative emotional states such as self-blame and mental rumination, which can exacerbate their binge-eating behaviors. Dialectical Behavior Therapy (DBT) is an evidence-based treatment approach that focuses on developing skills to manage emotions, improve interpersonal relationships, and regulate behaviors and in this population has not been studied.

The aim of the present study was investigate of the effectiveness of dialectical behavior therapy on self-blame and mental rumination of patients with binge-eating disorder.

The current research was a semi-experimental with a pretest, posttest, and 3-month follow-up design and a control group. The statistical population include all obese and overweight women aged 18 to 45 suffering from overeating in Karaj, who had regular visits to Overeaters Anonymous Association in Karaj between July 2022 and May 2023. A convenience method was used to select the sample (n=40) from among the statistical population, who volunteered to participate in the intervention and met the inclustion criteria. The subjects were assigned equally in two experimental (20 patients) and one wait-list control (20 patients). After the pretest, the subjects of the experimental group received the dialectical behavior therapy intevention in 2-hour weekly sessions for 9 sessions. Then the posttest stage and three months later follow-up was carried out. The tools used in this research were the levels of self-criticism scale (Thompson & Zuroff, 2004), the mental rumination (Nolen-Hoeksema and Maro, 1991) and the overeating questionnaire (Gormali et al., 1982). The data obtained from this research were analyzed using SPSS-27 software using mixed ANOVA.

The results showed that dialectical behavior therapy has a significant effect in reducing self-blame and mental rumination in binge eating patients and this effect has been stable after three months.

In conclusion, this study adds to the evidence supporting Dialectical Behavior Therapy (DBT) for treating binge-eating disorder. It shows that DBT reduces self-blame and mental rumination, and these improvements last at least three months. DBT's focus on addressing cognitive distortions and improving emotion regulation skills offers hope for long-term recovery.

The aim of this study was to examine the effectiveness of dialectical behavior therapy on reducing irritability and aggression in Middle school students in Kermanshah city. The study employed a semi-experimental research design with a pre-test-post-test methodology and a control group. The statistical population included boy students who were studying in the city of Kermanshah in the academic year of 2022-2023. The research sample consisted of 39 people (19 people in the experimental group and 20 people in the control group) who were selected by the available sampling method and randomly assigned to two experimental and control groups. The research tools included self-report questionnaire of disruptive mood dysregulation disorder Boudjerida et al (2022), Affective reactivity Stringaris et al (2012), Achenbach adolescent aggression scale (1991) and clinical interview Nussbaum (2013). The experimental group underwent 10 sessions of 60 minutes (two sessions per week) and the control group did not receive any training. At the end of the post-test sessions and finally after 3 months, follow-up was done. Data analysis was performed using the method of Univariate analysis of variance. The results showed that dialectical behavior therapy had a significant effect on reducing irritability and aggression in the post-test and follow-up stages. The findings of this research provide valuable information regarding dialectical behavior therapy, and counselors and psychologists can use this therapy to reduce disruptive behaviors such as irritability and aggression in adolescents with destructive mood disorder.

The present study was conducted to investigate the effectiveness of dialectical behavior therapy on general health and quality of life of people with multiple sclerosis. The present study was quasi-experimental with pretest, posttest, control group design. The statistical population included people suffering from multiple sclerosis in Rasht city in 2018, who participated in the M.S. Gilan province have a case. 27 people with multiple sclerosis were selected through purposive sampling method and were randomly accommodated into experimental and control groups. The experimental group received dialectical behavior therapy during twelve sessions. The applied questionnaires included General Health Questionnaire (Goldberg, Hiller, 1979) and Quality of Life Questionnaire (Varoshorbone, 1992). The data from the study were analyzed through Covariance. The results showed that dialectical behavior therapy has significant effect on the general health (F=33.67; Eta=0.58; P<0/001) and quality of life (F=17.32; Eta=0.43; P<0/001) in people with multiple sclerosis. According to the findings of the present study, dialectical behavior therapy can be used as an efficient method to improve general health and quality of life of people with multiple sclerosis through employing techniques such as bearing distress, acceptance and emotional self-regulation.

The present study was conducted with the aim of comparing the effectiveness of compassion-focused therapy and dialectical behavior therapy on the adversity quotients and emotional processing of adolescents with a history of self-injury. This research was a semi-experimental study with a pre-test, post-test design with experimental and control groups. The statistical population of the research included all female students of the second secondary level in the academic year of 2020-2021in Bushehr, who had a history of self-injury. Among them, 60 people were selected and randomly assigned to two experimental groups and one control group (20 people each). The first experimental group underwent compassion-based therapy and the second experimental group underwent dialectical behavioral therapy intervention, and the control group did not receive any intervention. The research tool were the self‐harm inventory (Sansone et al., 1998), Adversity Response Profile (Stoltz, 1997) and The Emotional Processing Scale (Baker et al., 2010). The results showed that both interventions increased the adversity quotients and reduced maladaptive emotional processing in adolescents (p<0.05). Also, the findings of the research indicated that there is a significant difference between compassion-focused therapy and dialectical behavior therapy, and compassion-focused therapy is more effective in increasing the adversity quotients and dialectical behavior therapy in emotional processing (p<0.001). According to the results of the research, both interventions can be used to improve the adversity quotients and emotional processing of adolescents with self-injury, along with other therapeutic interventions.

Due to the high rate of self-injury in adolescents in 2022 and its destructive effect, the present study was conducted to evaluate the effect of dialectical behavior therapy on self-criticism and self-compassion of adolescents with a history of self-injury behaviors.

The design of the present study is a single-subject experiment with several baselines. For this purpose, 3 female adolescents in Shiraz with a history of self-injury behaviors were selected by purposive sampling. Research tools included self-criticism questionnaires (FSCRS) of Gilbert et al., Neff Self-compassion questionnaires (SCS), and structured clinical interviews for personality disorders (SCID-5 PD). Each person was randomly assigned to the baseline stage over a period of two, three, or four weeks. They then received 16 sessions of treatment and then a follow-up after one month.

Dialectical behavior therapy was effective in reducing self-criticism and increasing self-compassion in all three clients after treatment, but the stability of the treatment effect remained only for the first and second clients.

It seems that the application of dialectical behavior therapy skills with the cooperation and support of parents can be associated with a decrease in self-criticism and increased self-compassion of female adolescents with a history of self-injury behaviors

The present study aimed to determine the effectiveness of online dialectical behavior therapy on students' feelings of loneliness and internet addiction. This was a semi-experimental study with a pre-test-post-test design with a control group. The statistical population of the research was made up of students aged 18 to 35 in Shiraz who were studying for one of the bachelor's or master's degrees in the academic year of 2020-2021. The research sample consisted of 40 students who were selected using a purposive sampling method and randomly assigned to two test and control groups. et al. (UCLA) 1980 and Young's Internet Addiction Test (IAT) 1998 were used. Online dialectical behavior therapy was implemented for the experimental group in 8 sessions for 90 minutes and twice a week for the experimental group. The results of the data analysis using multivariate covariance analysis showed that by controlling the pre-test, there is a significant difference between the post-test scores of the two groups in the variables of loneliness and internet addiction (P<0/001). This means that online dialectical behavior therapy has been effective in reducing students' feelings of loneliness and internet addiction.

The aim of this study was to compare the effectiveness of dialectical behavior therapy on self-control and adolescent distress tolerance of disordered mood disorders.

The research method was quasi-experimental pretest-posttest with a control group. The statistical population of this study was all male students aged 10 to 17 years in Kazerun in the academic year 1399-1400. The study sample consisted of 30 male students with disruptive mood disorder. Selection stages were assigned to experimental and control groups (15 people in each group). The research instruments were structured clinical interview, self-control scale (Tanji et al., 2004) and Simmons and Gaher (2005) Distress Tolerance Questionnaire. The collected data were statistically analyzed using multivariate analysis of covariance.

The results showed that any dialectical behavior therapy had a significant effect on increasing self-control and distress tolerance in children with disruptive mood disorders (P≥0.001).

Therefore, it can be concluded that dialectical behavior therapy can be used as an appropriate intervention method along with drug therapy.

This research was conducted with the aim of comparing the effectiveness of dialectical behavior therapy and mutual behavior analysis on interpersonal reactivity, self-control, and cognitive discipline of aggressive teenagers. The research design was semi-experimental in the pre-test-post-test manner with two experimental groups and one control group. The statistical population was the aggressive students of second secondary school for boys in Gorgan city in the academic year 2022-2023, using the cluster method, 45 students were randomly selected in three groups of 15 (dialectical behavior therapy experiment 1, interaction behavior analysis experiment 2 and the control group) were replaced. The research tools were the interpersonal reactivity questionnaires of Davis (1983), Tanji's self-control (2004), Granofsky and Kraij's (2001) emotion regulation, and Bass Perry's aggression (1992). Research data were analyzed by multivariate analysis of covariance and SPSS version 22 software. The findings showed that the effectiveness of the dialectical behavior therapy group was more than the mutual behavior analysis group. Based on the findings of the research, it can be concluded that dialectical behavior therapy by identifying the previous defective patterns of thoughts and feelings, accepting and validating emotions leads to the improvement of interpersonal reactivity, self-control and cognitive regulation of aggressive teenagers' emotions.

Prolonged exposure therapy is the first line of treatment for PTSD in veterans and military personnel; However, PE may not meet the preferences of many patients with PTSD. Therefore, the present study was conducted with the aim of determining the effectiveness of prolonged exposure therapy and DBT-PE combined treatment protocol on improving the post-traumatic growth of veterans with PTSD. The research method was a pre-test-post-test experiment with a control group along with a follow-up period. The statistical population of the study consisted of all veterans with PTSD who referred to Isar Psychiatric Hospital in Ardabil in 2022. The research sample included 60 veterans with PTSD who were selected as a purposeful sampling. In order to collect data, the post-traumatic growth questionnaire was used. The first experimental group received prolonged exposure therapy (10 sessions), and the second experimental group received integrated therapy for post-traumatic stress disorder (16 sessions of 90 to 120 minutes). The data were analyzed using mixed analysis of variance and Bonferroni's post hoc test. The findings of the results showed that exposure therapy and its combination with dialectical behavior therapy were effective in improving post-traumatic growth of veterans with PTSD (P<0.01); However, the effect of combined treatment was greater than other intervention (P<0.05). Therefore, using these results, it is possible to suggest the use of exposure therapy methods and its combination with dialectical behavior therapy as effective methods in improving psychological symptoms related to post-traumatic stress disorder in veterans, along with medical treatments.

Entering adolescence is one of the most important periods of transition in life. At this stage, leaving the safe and familiar environment of the home and facing academic challenges, the teenager faces significant tensions, which is one of the most important challenges in the field of emotion and emotional discipline, so this research aims to compare the effectiveness of dialectical behavior therapy and metacognition. Treatment was performed on cognitive strategies of emotional regulation in teenagers.Research

The research method was semi-experimental with a pre-test-post-test design and follow-up with a control group. The research population included all adolescent girls aged 13 to 16 years in district 1 of Baharestan city who studied in the seventh to tenth grades in the academic year of 1402-1401, who were referred to the education counseling center in 1401, and out of these, 3 The group of 20 people was randomly divided into two experimental groups and a control group (which in the research process were reduced to dialectical behavior therapy (17 people), metacognitive therapy (18 people) and control group (20 people) by random sampling method. ) and responded to the questionnaire of cognitive regulation strategies of emotion, Garnevsky, Kraich and Spinhaven in three times: pre-test, post-test and follow-up. The subjects of the experimental group were trained in dialectical behavior therapy and metacognitive therapy in a group (in the form of training and skills), for 2 months, 1 session of 90 minutes per week, but during this time, no training was given to the control group. The data was statistically analyzed with SPSS software and using the analysis of variance test with repeated measurements and a significance level of p < 0.05.

The results showed that the effect of metacognitive therapy on the cognitive strategies of emotional regulation is significant (P=0.019). So that metacognitive therapy has significantly increased cognitive strategies in adolescents compared to dialectical behavior therapy.

According to the results of this research, it can be said that the goal of dialectical behavior therapy and metacognitive therapy is to increase behaviors that probably lead to emotional regulation in adolescents, which is the reward.

High-risk behaviors are behaviors that increase the likelihood of physical, psychological and social disastrous consequences for the individual. The aim of this study was to compare the effectiveness of compassionate mind therapy and dialectical behavior therapy on cognitive deficits, emotional processing defects and impulsivity of soldiers aged 18 to 20 years with high-risk behaviors.

The method of the present study was quasi-experimental with a pretest-posttest design with a follow-up group. The statistical population of this study included all adolescent soldiers aged 18 to 20 years who referred to Valiasr Medical Center in Tehran in 2020. The sample selection process in the present study consisted of two stages: The first stage was done by purposeful sampling method of high-risk behaviors questionnaire to screen soldiers referred to Valiasr Medical Center in Tehran and among those who received a score higher than the screening method 50 people were selected based on the completion of the consent form for participation in the research as well as the inclusion and exclusion criteria of 45 people (15 people in the first experimental group, 15 people in the second experimental group and 15 people in the control) and specialized in 3 groups at random. To collect data, Iranian adolescents' risk questionnaires, cognitive deficits, Toronto Alexithymia scale, and Impulsivity Scale were used.

A pairwise comparison between the two treatment groups showed that cognitive deficits in the two treatment groups of compassion (I-J=7.20; P<0.01) and dialectical behavior therapy (I-J=8.66; P<0.01), Was significant from pre-test to post-test in contrast to control group (I-J=1.56; P<0.05); Also, the study of emotional processing deficits shows that only the dialectical behavior therapy group (I-J=12.73; P<0.01) was significant from pre-test to post-test. Also, the study of impulsivity in treatment groups shows that only compassion treatment was effective in reducing impulsivity (I-J=7.66; P<0.01).

According to the findings of the present study, it seems that with compassionate practice and increasing positive emotions, a person's behavioral-intellectual treasury expands, which can it provided the basis for problem-solving and the reduction of conflicts between intrapersonal and interpersonal emotions, thereby reducing impulsivity and risky behaviors.

Obesity is a pervasive problem that can severely impair physical health. The aim of this study was to compare the effectiveness of dialectical behavior therapy and cognitive-behavioral therapy on self-management in obese people.

The present study was a quasi-experimental pretest-posttest with follow-up and control group. The statistical population of the study included all patients referred to the counseling and psychological center of the best way in Qazvin in 1398 who were diagnosed with obesity by physicians and nutritionists. Using purposive sampling method, 60 people were selected and randomly assigned to three groups (dialectical behavior therapy and cognitive behavioral therapy and control) (20 people in each group). Cognitive-behavioral therapy and dialectical behavior therapy were performed for 10 sessions for the experimental groups and no treatment was performed for the control group. The bariatric surgery self-management questionnaire was completed by the participants in the pre-test, post-test and six-month follow-up stages. Mixed analysis of variance test was used to analyze the data.

Due to the difference between the test stages after performing two interventions of dialectical behavior therapy and cognitive-behavioral therapy, group membership and interaction of stages and groups were significant for self-management (P <0.05). The effectiveness of dialectical behavior therapy was greater than cognitive-behavioral therapy.

Based on the results of this study, it seems that dialectical behavior therapy and cognitive behavioral therapy can be effective in increasing self-management in obese people.

The purpose of this study was determination the effectiveness of Dialectical behavior therapy techniques Training on distress tolerance and self-assertiveness in bullied-victimized students. This semi-experimental study was conducted using pre-test and post-test with control group. The statistical population of the study was all male high school students of first section of Tabriz city in the (2018-2019) who 30 bullied-victimized students were selected by purposeful sampling, one-stage cluster sampling, and screening procedures and finally these subjects were randomly assigned to the experimental and control group (15 subjects in each group). The instruments used included the Bullied-Victimized Iranian Scale, Simmons & Gaher Distress Tolerance Scale, self-assertiveness questionnaire(ASA). The experimental group experienced 10 sessions of training Dialectical Behavioral therapy techniques, while control group did not received any training. Data were analyzed using analysis of covariance method. Results showed that there were significant differences in distress tolerance, and self-assertiveness post-test scores between the experimental group and the control group (p < 0.001). Thus, it can be concluded that Dialectical behavior therapy techniques Training can improve distress tolerance and self-assertiveness among bullied-victimized male students.