جستجوی مقالات مرتبط با کلیدواژه "research performance" در نشریات گروه "علوم تربیتی"

The purpose of this study was to explore the phenomenon of continuous evaluation of the faculty members' performance at Farhanguian University with an emphasis on the research aspect and to provide a model for it.

For this purpose, the researcher conducted a systematic study of the literature related to the subject under investigation and after examining and analyzing the theoretical and experimental bases of the research, the initial conceptual framework was designed. In the executive part of the research, qualitative research method was used to collect data. Using the semi-structured interview tool, the researcher interviewed with 17, an, using limited theoretical bases and analyzing the thematic content of the opinions raised, the researcher extracted the components and quality evaluation criteria of faculty members' performance evaluation.

The research findings were analyzed using thematic analysis and through the coding, the model resulting from the interviews with the experts, the focal group and the theoretical foundations of the research were designed and approved. The exploratory model showed that the research performance evaluation structure of faculty members includes 7 main components of "Research Outputs; Professional Development; Individual Characteristics, Research Consultation, Effectiveness and Social Responsibility of Research, Executive and Specialized Services, Needs-oriented Research”, and 34 sub-components, and the path of continuous evaluation of research activities of faculty members passes through these dimensions.

The use and preparation of the establishment of the estimated model and using its components and sub-components to evaluate the research performance of faculty members, It can lead to the efficient and effective realization of the study and research missions of Farhangian University.

The present study aimed to formulate a model for the internal brand of the function of research in the university.This qualitative research type is conducted using the grounded theory approach. the central phenomenon of the study, the internal brand of the research function in the university was defined. The statistical population of this study included faculty members and research assistants of universities; therefore, the number of participants was 13 people selected based on the semi-structured interview method. In the current study, the Fuzzy Delphi technique, as one of the scientific analysis techniques was used to reach a consensus among the panel members to validate the components and dimensions of the internal brand model of research function. In this regard, a questionnaire was sent to 30 faculty members using the results of previous studies and the findings of the grounded theory. The Fuzzy Delphi technique in this study was generally implemented in two shifts.

The findings of this study included 149 indicators that were identified in the form of 9 dimensions, including the image of the university brand, Dynamic management of brand knowledge, key values, individual and organizational factors, brand mechanisms, brand-oriented leadership, supporting processes, brand-oriented performance, and citizenship behavior as well as 17 sub-components. Then, the TOPSIS FUZZY technique was employed to rank the sub-components and dimensions. Based on the obtained results, it can be concluded that the most important factors in the internal brand of the research function are the brand image and organizational values of the university.

The development of human capital of faculty members is an effective achievement in the direction of the development of the higher education system. However, the evidence based on the results of experimental research indicates the low quality of the faculty members' performance. The aim of the current research is to measure and evaluate the development of human capital of faculty members, which was done with a mixed approach (sequential exploratory).

In the qualitative part of the research, the participants were the faculty members of the universities and research institutes of Tehran, and 13 of them were interviewed and the required data were collected using the purposeful sampling method. The data analysis of this section was done using thematic analysis method. In order to evaluate the reliability of research findings, immersion and recoding approach was used by calculating Cohen's kappa coefficient. In the quantitative part, the statistical population included the faculty members of the University of Tehran, 150 of whom were selected using Cochran's formula and the relative stratified sampling method from the four campuses of "Humanities", "Behavioral and Social Sciences", "Basic Sciences" and "Technical-Eengineering" were selected as samples. The tool for collecting data was the quantitative part of the researcher-made questionnaire on the development of human capital of faculty members in a 6-point range. The validity of the research tool was verified by formal, convergent and divergent method and its reliability was confirmed through Cronbach's alpha test and composite reliability.

The findings of the qualitative section were categorized and presented in 9 dimensions, which include improving the ability to formulate specialized and interdisciplinary lesson plans, improving the ability to teach and learn, improving classroom management and administration skills, Enhancing academic and behavioral counseling and guidance, increasing commitment to professional ethics in the education process, enhancing the ability to motivate students to learn, enhancing the ability to evaluate learners' performance, enhancing research knowledge, and enhancing research skills. In the quantitative part, based on the results of Shannon's entropy test, the priority of the dimensions of improving classroom management skills and improving research knowledge was confirmed over other dimensions. The values of the Chi-2 test indicated the favorable condition of the main structure of educational human capital development and the relatively favorable condition of the main structure of research-entrepreneurship human capital development of faculty members of Tehran University. Based on Yeoman-Whitney and Kraskal-Wallis test values, the inequality of the average educational human capital development of faculty members was confirmed in terms of a number of variables and effective factors.

The results of the research showed that the development of educational and research human capital of faculty members, setting priorities and identifying inequalities in the development of human capital of faculty members in terms of influencing factors can provide an effective and efficient road map for planning to provide a strategy for the development of human capital of faculty members to policy makers, decision makers and activists in this field.

The aim of this study was to identify, explain the dimensions, components and indicators of research performance of faculty members of the Islamic Azad University of Tehran.

The research was conducted with a qualitative approach, using content analysis method. Purposeful sampling, and interviews with experts continued until theoretical saturation was achieved. To determine the logical framework of the data, the steps of identification, note-taking and classification of concepts were performed. Categories were reviewed and duplicates were deleted, similar items were merged, and subject dimensions were identified and leveled. Data analysis method was performed by thematic analysis technique of open, axial and selective coding. Then, in order to assess the validity of the model, an agreement was reached with ten faculty experts in the form of a focus group on the dimensions, components and indicators of the model.

The results showed that the extracted model has 9 dimensions, 25 components and 80 indicators to evaluate the research performance of faculty members. The results showed that the indicators of creativity, initiative and innovation are among the components and characteristics of personality and are in the individual dimension.

The proposed model can be desirable in evaluating the research performance of faculty members of the Islamic Azad University and eliminating possible problems and obstacles and promoting its creativity and initiative

Assessing faculty members involves formal steps in assessing and informing faculty members about how to do the job and the responsibilities assigned to them in different dimensions. In the present study, the evaluation of faculty members has been done from two educational and research perspectives. The statistical population of the present study is 307 faculty members of one of the public universities. Educational performance information has been prepared in collaboration with the Office of Monitoring, Evaluation and Quality Assurance of the University, as well as research performance information in collaboration with the Vice Chancellor for Research. Data analysis was performed using artificial intelligence method and using MATLAB software. In analyzing the results, first, using threshold clustering, faculty members were divided into four clusters. Then, in the second step of the analysis, the potential of the general regression neural network is used. Using the general regression neural network, the degree to which individuals depend on each of the four clusters is determined. The results show that most faculty members have a good educational situation, while the research status of faculty members is not good. Also, in general, research and educational performance between faculties, Faculty of Chemistry (0.99 and 0.60), first rank and physical education faculties (0.34 and 0.99), basic sciences (0.58 and 0.37) and economic and administrative sciences ( 0.40 and 0.47) gained the next ranks. In the final section, by comparing the two methods, while examining the advantages of using the general regression neural network, the necessary suggestions are presented.

In this article, the status of research in Iran has been evaluated with a focus on the field of engineering and especially mechanical engineering. To achieve this goal, the quantity and quality of research have been studied and compared with developed and developing countries. The number of scientific publications has been used as the main quantitative index. In order to assess the quality of research, qualitative indicators such as the number of citations, the ratio of citation per document, the h-index, the scientific conferences and the top researchers have been analyzed. The results indicate that the quantity of the publications is favorable. In terms of the quantity of publications in the field of mechanical engineering, Iran ranked 14th in the world, and the ranking of the country is suitable for the h-index, which is a qualitative indicator of scientific production, while looking at the other qualitative index, which refers to the number of citation per document, the rank of Iran among the other countries is not suitable. In this article, suggestions have been made to improve the quality of research.