جستجوی مقالات مرتبط با کلیدواژه "دلفی" در نشریات گروه "کتابداری و مدیریت اطلاعات"

The aim of the current research is to present a model for the development of academic entrepreneurship in Iraq using the interpretative-structural modeling approach.

The current research is applied in terms of purpose and descriptive-analytical in terms of data collection. In order to collect data, 15 factors were identified as the most important factors by first reviewing the theoretical foundations and the views of 20 experts as members of the Delphi panel. It should be noted that the statistical population of the research is Al-Qadisieh University in Divaniye city, and the target sample was selected by purposive sampling method and applying indicators such as experience, proficiency participation willingness and ability as well as accessibility. The tool of data collection is a researcher-made questionnaire. In order to analyze the data, structural interpretive modeling method was used.

The results of the research showed that senior management support for entrepreneurial activities, supportive organizational structure in order to facilitate creative and innovative behaviors and commercialization measures, and establishing supportive and flexible laws in the field of entrepreneurship, intellectual property rights and commercialization as the most important effective factors. In the development of academic entrepreneurship in Iraq, it is known in the present research.
 

: By showing its desire and motivation in the development of academic entrepreneurship and manifesting this motivation in  terms  of a series of key actions, the university  could   be very fruitful in advancing the intended goals and developing academic entrepreneurship, and considering the nature of academic entrepreneurship, the university   will play the main role in this process and until this desire and motivation from the university towards  academic  entrepreneurship is not seen by the government and other actors, we  may not  expect to advance the goals of  academic  entrepreneurship

The implementation of Information and Communication Technology (ICT) projects encompasses a wide range of stakeholders and, due to their innovative nature, encounters numerous risks. The synergy resulting from the simultaneous study of the risks and stakeholders of ICT projects, which was neglected in previous research, was the motivation of this study. The study is designed with an applied objective, providing insights that facilitate the management of vital risks concerning influential stakeholders. Therefore, first this research has identified the stakeholders and risks of ICT projects, then used the Delphi method to identify the risks associated with stakeholders. Findings from the intersection of risks and stakeholders in ICT projects have been analyzed with two approaches. The results indicate that in the area of stakeholders, project implementers play the most critical role in driving the success of ICT projects. In the area of risk, organizational risks represent the largest category, accounting for 34% of the identified risks, followed by financial risks at 31%.

The purpose of this study was to identify the structural factors necessary for the realization of knowledge governance. To achieve this goal, a two-step strategy was used. In the first step, the method of meta-synthesize was carried out. By searching the databases, 319 articles were found and in the evaluation process 25 papers were finally approved. By studying these articles 25 codes and 8 concepts (including the structure for knowledge management, incentive system, communication system, formalism, centralization, management support structure, culture and work procedures) were extracted for the research question. After verifying the validity and reliability of the results, Delphi method was used in the second phase to get expert opinion. For this purpose, the output of the content required to design the Delphi questionnaire was completed and Delphi process went on to the extent that the opinions of the experts reached a consensus on the answers to the questions. Ten experts were selected based on the purposeful sampling method and Delphi method was performed to three stages. Finally, in order to answer the question of structural arrangements for the realization of knowledge governance in the organization, 14 guiding principles were presented in the form of structural and system principles. The average of Delphi experts' opinions showed that in order to realize knowledge governance, it was necessary to define the roles and responsibilities of KM, create a construct for creativity and agility, create effective communication systems for the KM, interact with creative stakeholders, create an independent knowledge management office, create a team-centered structure and encourage collaboration, define and identify the role of senior manager of knowledge in the organization's hierarchy, empower knowledge management, provide a managerial structure for knowledge management support (such as the Knowledge Management Committee or the Knowledge Management Council) create, formalize the structure of the KM, formalize systems and processes, create incentive and reward systems for knowledge governance, define and create relationships with other business units, create an organizational culture to create and share knowledge. According to a research, no article was found that could identify structural arrangements for knowledge management by using this method and Delphi; therefore, the present research is innovative in the subject and method used.

The present study aims to explain and elucidate the evaluating indicators ofscience, technology in Iranian Agricultural Research, Education and Extension Organization based on the analysis of high level documents and Persian and non-Persian articles relevent to activities of the organization that have been approved by the experts.

For this research, in the first stage, the Meta-synthesis was used. Out of 108 documents related to the research topic, 26 were analyzed. To analyse the indices obtained during the process, a survey of experts using the Delphi technique was used. Thus, the present research method is triangulation mixed method.

In total, 8 main criteria including research and technology, products from technological research, genetic resources and biodiversity management, education, extension, human capital, financial and infrastructure resources along with 242 indicators for the evaluation of science and technology, were confirmed by the experts.

In addition to the conventional indicators in high level documens, the science and technology indicators of the Organization derived from the Delphi study based on special two-tier of "products from technological research" and "genetic reserve and biodiversity management" demonstrated the highest level of consensus among experts and can serve as the indicators for assessing agricultural science and technology.

The research utilizes resources and the wisdom of the crowd of IT experts and other participants in industry to increase the effectiveness of policies and decisions in the area. To achieve this goal, 107 future and emerging technologies from foresight reports, and research programs in Europe, Japan, Taiwan and Gartner firm were extracted. Then out of these technologies, 69 cases (categorized in 14 subject areas) were acknowledged by expert's panel for applying as the Delphi inputs.
By, using the Delphi method (two round), IT R&D barriers, challenges that are expected to respond and effective organizations in IT R&D investment, and prioritized has been determined according to the panel members. Then, panel member view about each technology was evaluated by Criteria - including: degree of expertise, Importance, Forecasted time of technological realization (in the word) and widespread use of technology in Iran, Iran's status in the life cycle of knowledge and, Impact of technology in IT applications area.
The results of the Delphi process was reported in national level, include: Delphi panel members demography, public questions and specialized questions for each of the technologies. Finally the research provides some recommendations for decision makers.

Considering the high flexibility of the present world and the capability of firms to meet customers'' needs، adopting a dynamic competitive advantage is necessary. One of the most effective ways to enjoy this advantage is tapping into foresight process in order to forecasting the future of industry. In this article we decided to develop a comprehensive strategy model to achieve dynamic competitive advantage by studying the existing literature in the field of strategy formulation which includes firms'' internal and external factors. The core of this model is based on Delphi foresight technique and the authors'' approach to this conceptual model is presented. This model consists of four phases; input data، phase one of foresight program، phase two of foresight program and final firm strategy formulation.

Generic high-technology such as ICT, have been developed in different countries and societies based on variant developing models. These models are raised from distinctive views & paradigms; hence policies and advices would be different, even contradicted. ICT as the most obvious and well known generic high-tech, in different countries is developed and grown in different ways, and by different policies. This study is focused on the most important local views on developing ICT in Iran, so similarities and dissimilarities of views are introduced. By using Delphi method, ideas of Iranian experts in developing ICT are gathered, in 2 rounds. Then experts are clustered in different independent clusters, based on their ideas, concerns & advices in S&T policies. Results show that there are 4 different groups of views on ICT developing in Iran, so each cluster advices different policies and strategies; in proportion with others. Competitions between these views prevent dominance of one view in developing ICT; it makes policies inconsistent, However.