جستجوی مقالات مرتبط با کلیدواژه "360 degree feedback" در نشریات گروه "کتابداری و مدیریت اطلاعات"

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the performance of librarians of the central library of Shahid Chamran University of Ahvaz using a 360 degree method. This research, conducted by a survey method, is descriptive and analytical in terms of its purpose in terms of its purpose. The statistical population of the study consisted of managers, librarians, colleagues and users of the central library of Shahid Chamran University of Ahvaz. The methodology was that each librarian was assessed by the manager, the librarian himself, associates and 28 users, and their views were compared. The results showed that librarians' performance status in the knowledge and professional knowledge skill index (4.14), skills Moral value-value (4.22), personality skills (3.94), functional skills (3.87) and communication skills (3.85) were higher than average and were evaluated as desirable. Performance evaluation of librarians can be one of the main factors in the progress of libraries. Therefore, the evaluation of librarians and their recognition will lead to library upgrades. Assessing librarians by 360 degrees or group assessment can be a new way of evaluating librarians.

This study aimed to evaluate the performance of Kerman university librarians have been carried out by degrees.
The present study was conducted using analytical survey method and degree feedback was used to evaluate the performance of the community. Information related to the evaluation of their performance was compiled by questionnaires that considered their assessor's selfassessment views, manager's evaluation and evaluation of colleagues and evaluation of library users. The research community of all librarians of Kerman University libraries. The data gathering tool was Faraj Pahloo et al. ( ), which consists of questionnaires to examine the person from the perspective of the head, colleague, referral and person.
Findings: After evaluating the performance of the subjects and comparing the results from the viewpoint of the four evaluation groups, there was a significant difference between the views of the evaluated person and the head of view in the ethical index. There is no significant difference in the performance index between librarian's assessment from the viewpoint of different groups. In the process index, there is only a significant difference between the evaluated point and the point of view.
The results of this study showed that in order to obtain more accurate results, one could establish a common language among their assessors and evaluators in terms of their indices and their terms, so that prior to any assessment, On how to evaluate others and rating evaluators so that people are more careful in evaluating their colleagues or other groups and ultimately improving the credibility of the evaluations.

This research aimed at performance appraisal of librarians in public libraries in Mazandaran province, using 360 degree feedback.
Research was applied research and used survey-analysis methodology. The data were collected by former - build questionnaires. Validity and reliability of questionnaires were in high level, Cronbach's alpha in all questionnaires were higher than 0.75. Population was 95 librarians, 32 superiors, 95 colleagues and 95 users and census method. Each librarian assessed by one superior, all colleagues, one user and a Self-assessment questionnaire filled by each librarian. This research used SPSS 22 and PLS and the Kolmogorov-Smirnov and ANOVA test were used for data analysis.
Findings: Librarians’ performance in total (4.35) and status of their performance in moral - value skills (4.44), functional skills (4.32) and process skills (4.33) was higher than average level. There was no significant difference between the results of four groups in the moral - value index (0.097) but there was significant difference between the results of four groups in functional skills, process skills and total assessment of librarians cause significant level was lower than 0.05. Comparison of librarians’ performance scores in each library showed significant level for 3 indexes and total score of performance evaluation was lower than 0.05 that showed significant difference was observed in these indexes among the 32 libraries.
Employees assessment is the main factor in growth of an organization. Evaluation and recognition of librarians will enhance libraries. Therefore, using 360 degree feedback may be a new method for librarians.

This research aimed at performance appraisal of public librarians in Guilan province, using 360 degree feedback approach.

The survey used a questionnaire devised for data collection in 4 formats, to assess librarians by 4 groups: superiors, colleagues, themselves, and library users. The research population was the community of all 80 public librarians in Guilan Province, north of Iran.. From a pool of the available sources and documents, items were derived or created in accordance with views of some academics and experts who were selected as a Delphi Panel from a range of people known for their experience and/or expertise in library management.

In regard with Moral-Value Index, self-evaluations were significantly different from those of superiors, colleagues and library users. As far as the Process Index was concerned, there was a significant difference between the users’ viewpoints and other three groups. In relation to Performance Index, as well as the general appraisal, no significant difference was observed among the viewpoints of the four evaluating groups. Originality/Value: This the first application of 360 degree feedback approaches in Iranian libraries.