جستجوی مقالات مرتبط با کلیدواژه "شهید مطهری" در نشریات گروه "اقتصاد"

This study examines the development within the framework of the Islamic School of Economics, focusing on the views of Shahid Sadr and Shahid Beheshti.The findings of this study indicate that the ideas of Shahid Sadr and Shahid Beheshti have been observing development in several ways.; first, in the distribution system before production, the equal distribution of facilities and in the post-distribution system, the struggle against the profitability of infertile capital Factors that indicate development. Second, the element of labor and the needs that are considered in Islamic economics is a sign of development, and their implication of development is that in eliminating inequality and its role in paying the cost of experiencing experiences, Creating social balances and fighting anti-development dependency are very influential. Third, in discussing production, preventing usurpation and imprisonment of money and wealth are symbols that will imply the development of a fair price for productive inputs and will accelerate the development process. Fourthly, in Islam, the boycotts of lucrative spending and invitations to consume as much as they need to reform the pattern of consumption and supportive development programs. Finally, attention to the critical role of the state, attention to the element of good and forbidding, are the attention to the increase in the skill and initiative of the symbols that signify the importance of developing a preventive program of corruption, social monitoring and tacit knowledge, indicating the level of development Will be the community.

In the discussions about social and economic justice, the criterion of choosing an approach is the effect which justice exerts on theoretical and practical aspects. This idea increases the importance of exploring Islam's approach to justice, and balance. The present paper examines the hypothesis of conformity in martyr Șadr and Motahhari's views on balance in order to make explicit Islam's approach to balance. The research which relies on a library method, comes up with three main

first, according to martyr Sadr's approach, balance is based on two principles: reducing great inequalities and earning an income which ensures a respectable standard of living. Second, martyr Motahhari's approach represents his views on natural rights. Third, there is no inconsistency between martyr Sadr's approach and that of martyr Motahharis, in spite of some unfounded claims.

John Rawls is one of the biggest political philosophers in social justice field and Shahid Morteza Motahari is one of the Islamic Scholars in 20st century. Although none of them is economist, there are noteworthy criterions of economic just distribution in their works. Rawls believed the initial facilities-particularly basic freedoms-should be distributed equally. He accepted the unequally distributions provided that incomes and efforts move proportional to each other and his inclination was toward the lowest income levels. Furthermore, Shahid Motahari described equal initial facilities distribution, distribution according to the people’s merit and assets redistribution based on social harmony as three stages of distribution system. Considering the nature of justice as something beyond religion, the equal initial facilities distribution, according merit distribution and the regard to the low-income people are the important similar points; and the origin of legitimacy of justice, economic redistribution role and concepts of freedoms are the important different points of these two thinkers’ viewpoints.