جستجوی مقالات مرتبط با کلیدواژه "board of directors" در نشریات گروه "مالی"

The purpose of the research is to design a mechanism to increase the participation of retail shareholders in the management of enterprises. Through this increase, the improvement of corporate governance, the reduction of information asymmetry and the increase of the awareness of retail shareholders happen. After library studies, this research presented a model of participation of retail shareholders in the management of listed companies through a questionnaire and a survey of experts and retail shareholders, and the model was confirmed through the fuzzy Delphi method. In the proposed model, retail shareholders can buy and sell their voting rights close to the annual meeting through a SPC. Therefore, during this process, the shareholders who want to have the power to exercise more votes in the annual meeting, buy the voting rights of other retail shareholders. In addition, they are able to choose a representative from among themselves to be on the company's board of directors by using the platform provided in the proposed model through their voting coalition. By implementing such a mechanism, it will be possible to obtain 511 board seats by retail shareholders in listed companies. The results of the research showed that the proposed model will increase the motivation of retail shareholders to participate in meetings, increase the awareness of shareholders and improve transparency.

Tensions between the rights of individuals and organizations have been fundamental problems in societies.Financial markets and powerful corporations are growing dramatically around the world.In the face of this growth, there must be targeted legal and regulatory tools for corporate accountability.Corporate governance is designed in the same framework.Corporate governance system is a reaction to the issue of representation and to the separation of ownership from management or, more commonly, the separation of ownership from control of companies, and is itself the result of two main causes;First, each participant has different goals and preferences.Second, each does not have complete information about the other's actions, knowledge, and preferences.Obviously, this separation, assuming effective executive mechanisms of corporate governance, creates the potential for managers to make decisions that are in line with their own interests and the opposite of the interests of shareholders.Gradually, as the authority to exercise direct sovereignty over the owners diminishes, control is transferred to other groups, such as boards and directors.It can be said that any change in the implementation of the governance structure has a great impact on the change of leadership and their performance.The relationship between corporate governance and corporate performance is an important issue in financial matters. Corporate governance aims to strengthen the atmosphere of transparency, honesty and accountability in the management of the organization. Evaluating the performance of corporate governance and examining its mechanisms is very important and has a great impact on economic decisions of companies.

The role of corporate governance in today’s corporate world is gaining importance day by day. That is the very reason academicians around the world are paying more attention developing and testing the existing and new practices of corporate governance. The board of directors is considered as one of the most important dimensions of effective corporate governance since it becomes a key mechanism to mitigate conflicts between shareholders and managers. The aim of this paper is to investigate and rank the Board of Directors and committees of 36 bank and credit institution operating in the IRAN non-usury banking system from the perspective of corporate governance. In this paper, after reviewing the literature of Board of Directors and committees and previous research on this subject, extract the board of directors and committees of Iranian banks to assess this subject in the Iranian bank, and then ultimately rank Iranian bank on this basis. The research method used in this research is content analysis.The results show the inappropriate status of board of directors and its committees in state banks and appropriate status in some private banks.

Corporate governance refers to the mechanisms that direct and control companies. It identifies the distribution of rights and responsibilities among different participants in the corporation. Board of directors has one of the important roles in corporate governance. The purpose of this study was to determine the relationship between corporate governance and directors compensation in listed companies of Tehran Stock Exchange. It aims to verify empirically the relationship between the characteristics of boards of directors and cash compensation of directors in the Tehran Stock Exchange. With a view to testing hypothesis, we selected a sample of 92 listed corporations for the period 2006-2012 and the method used is a panel data approach. The results of this work reveal that profitability, firm size, board ownership and the duality of the chairman and the chief executive officer (CEO) has been positively related to the director compensation and the board size has a negative and non-significant relationship. Industry is also influencing directors compensation

The purpose of this study was to investigate the role of corporate governance in corporate tax planning.The features of the used corporate governance include the size of board of directors, the size of off duty board, the stability of the position of CEO and financial specialty of the board. Tax planning is measured by GAAP and cash ETR (Effective Tax Rate).In order to test the research hypotheses, financial information of 54 firms from 2009 to 2013 was used and multiple regression analysis was employed as the statistics method. The results show that corporate planning mostly exists in the firms with fewer board members. In addition, the more off duty board members in a firm and the more stable the position of the CEO, the more corporate tax planning. The findings of the research do not show a clear effect of the financial specialty of the board on tax planning. The findings, however, indicate that the firms with higher ROA have more tax planning but financiall everage has no effect on tax planning. The effect of firm size on tax planning is not clear either.