جستجوی مقالات مرتبط با کلیدواژه « فاجعه پنداری » در نشریات گروه « علوم انسانی »

The current study aimed to determine the effectiveness of acceptance and commitment therapy on catastrophizing and mental well-being in people who have recovered from COVID-19. The research method was semi-experimental with a pre-test-post-test design with a control group. The statistical population of this study included all those who recovered from the Covid-19 disease who were discharged from Imam Reza (AS) hospital in Mashhad in the second quarter of 2021, among them there were 24 people, 12 in the control group and 12 in the control group. The experimental group was selected through an available sampling method and randomly placed in two groups. The research tools include Sullivan et al's Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS, 1995) and Keyes and Magyarmo's Subjective Wellbeing Scale (SWS, 2003), and the acceptance and commitment treatment protocol by Hayes et al. (2006) in 8 sessions of 90 minutes, twice a week as a group for the experimental group Done. Accomplished. To analyze the data, the multivariate covariance test (MANCOVA) was used. The findings of the research showed that by controlling the effect of the pre-test, there was a significant difference at the level of 0.05 between the post-test mean of catastrophizing and mental well-being in the two experimental and control groups. As a result, treatment based on acceptance and commitment can be considered an effective intervention for those who have recovered from the Covid-19 period.

Abstract The corona virus epidemic was a sudden and destructive event that led to many deaths. This study aimed to investigate the effectiveness of emotion-focused therapy on catastrophizing and mental well-being in people who have recovered from COVID-19.Research The research was a two-group semi-experimental research (experimental and control) with three stages (pre-test, post-test and three-month follow-up). The statistical population included all those who recovered from COVID-19 and were discharged from Imam Reza hospital in Mashhad in the first quarter of 2021. Out of this population, 30 people were selected using the convenient sampling method based on the purpose and using the inclusion criteria, and were randomly placed in two groups of 15 (experimental and control). The experimental group received ten 90-minute sessions of emotion-focused therapy, while the control group did not receive training. The research tools included Sullivan’s Pain Catastrophizing Scale and Keyes and Magyar-Moe’s Subjective Well-Being Questionnaire, which were administered to the participants in both groups in the pre-test, post-test and follow-up phases. Data analysis was done using repeated measure ANOVA using SPSS-22. Results showed that the mean catastrophizing scores of the experimental group compared to that of control group decreased significantly in the post-test phase (P<0.001). Also, the average mental well-being scores of the experimental group compared to that of the control group increased significantly in the post-test phase (P<0.001). These results remained stable in the follow-up phase. Based on the results, it can be concluded that emotion-focused therapy can be considered an effective intervention method in reducing catastrophizing and improving mental well-being in people who have recovered from COVID-19.

The aim of this study was Comparison of rumination, sense of helplessness, and magnification at different ages and their relation to stress coping styles in visitors of a mental health monitoring website during the first week of coronavirus outbreaks. This research was descriptive and correlational. The statistical population of the study was consisted of all visitors to a mental health assessment website during the period of February 21st to 29th, 2020. The sample of this study consisted of 933 visitors who purposefully answered Catastrophizing Scale (Sullivan, 2009), and Coping Styles Questionnaire (Endler & Parker, 1990). Data were analyzed using analysis of variance and Pearson’s correlation coefficient. The result showed that there was a significant difference between subjective rumination, Sense of helplessness, and magnification at different ages of society at the time of the outbreak of coronavirus (P <0.05). Rumination was different at different ages. The sense of helplessness was less with age. Magnification was less common in people over 45 years old. Correlation between variables showed that problem solving coping strategy was negatively related to feelings of helplessness, magnification, and rumination (P>0.05). Emotionalism was positive relation with all three variables (P>0.05). Avoidance was positive relation with magnification and rumination (P>0.05).

The aim of present study was to investigate the effectiveness of modified Mindfulness-Based Cognitive Therapy (MBCT) in catastrophizing, acceptance and severity of pain in Fibromyalgia patients.

This was a semi-experimental study in which 24 women with Fibromyalgia were randomly allocated to mindfulness intervention and control groups. The Pain Cataststrophizing Scale, Chronic Pain Acceptance Questionnaire and Multidimensional Pain Inventory were completed by subjects in both groups before and after the intervention. Data were analyzed using analysis of multi covariance (MANCOVA).

The result of multi covariance analysis showed that cataststrophizing, acceptance and severity of pain have significant differences between two groups (p< 0/01). Moreover, there are significant differences in subscales of pain cataststrophizing (rumination, magnification and helplessness) and pain acceptance (Activities engagement and Pain willingness) between groups in significant level of 99%.

the present Results support of Effectiveness of modified mindfulness-based cognitive therapy for pain in reducing cataststrophizing and severity of pain and increasing pain acceptance in Fibromyalgia patients.