جستجوی مقالات مرتبط با کلیدواژه « پاسخ دهی کیفری » در نشریات گروه « علوم انسانی »

The title of security crimes refers to crimes that threaten the existence of the entire society and the government. Undoubtedly, security crimes can be considered as one of the most sensitive and important areas of challenge and confrontation between the rights of sovereignty and the rights of citizens. Criminalization and criminal accountability derived from the governing principles and dignity-oriented components contained in the extra-legal and legislative regulations and human rights requirements imposes the law on the citizens. Observance of dignity-oriented components in criminalization and criminal response to crime and social anomalies leads to the establishment of a proper balance between the rights of the sovereign and the rights of citizens, and failure to observe dignity-oriented components in criminalization and criminal response in security crimes results in an increase in criminal behavior and There will be no cost to society.

The current research is qualitative and according to the nature of the subject, in terms of practical purpose and in terms of collecting information by documentary method and through the study of valid laws and sources, and the obtained information has been analyzed in a descriptive-analytical manner.

The country's criminal policy regarding the criminalization and criminal response to security crimes was analyzed and evaluated in terms of dignity-based components in the supra-legislative and legislative regulations and human rights requirements. Criminal accountability guarantees the citizenship rights of the accused and the perpetrators of the aforementioned crimes and promotes the rights of sovereignty.

According to the security-oriented approach governing security crimes, overseeing the criminalization and criminal response of the existing criminal policy with the development of criminalization in the area of ​​citizens' free behavioral space, the application of severe punishments and the lack of amicable criminal responses to such Crimes have brought challenges to the rights and freedoms of citizens. In order to clear the ambiguities in the criminalization and criminal response of security crimes, the legislator should take action to amend and adapt the laws with dignity-oriented components in this field.

Analysis and investigation of processing as one of the main parts of the criminal justice system concerning banking crimes is one of the most important needs of the legal and economic system in Iran given the current state of the banking system. Determining the different processing methods and pre-determining different punishments by the legislator for each of the crimes indicates the existence of a relationship between the degree of the importance of the crimes and the method of processing and imposition of punishment concerning them. Therefore, the analysis of the procedures for processing banking crimes and finding the starting point of the legislator in these cases shows the importance of these crimes according to the viewpoint of the legislator. What seems to be an efficient and specialized solution is the adoption of a different criminal policy regarding banking offenses. But the performance of our legislative and judicial systems in applying such a policy does not seem very defensible. Whereas the study of the processing method concerning banking crimes in general does not produce scientific and useful effects and results; In this article about each of the banking crimes, the method and conditions of processing them have been carefully and technically analyzed.