جستجوی مقالات مرتبط با کلیدواژه « ahd » در نشریات گروه « علوم انسانی »

One of the challenges facing the Holy Qur'an in interpretation and translation is the seemingly synonymous words that are interpreted as synonyms. By accepting the principle of non-synonymy in the Holy Qur'an, the importance and delicacy of the work of interpretation and translation of the Qur'an becomes more apparent; Because sometimes only one word can be expressed in front of several words of the Holy Quran in the target language, careful selection of translation words in such cases brings the audience closer to the main meaning and purpose and wisdom of choosing these words by God. And in addition to observing the criteria hidden in the truth of the words, he reveals the rhetorical miracle of the Qur'an more than before; The present study seeks to use a descriptive-analytical method by selecting an example of these synonymous words that the word "Ahd" and"misagh" is below verse 27 of Surah Al-Baqarah and also by examining the word"Naghz" which is a common verb for these two words in the Holy Quran; First, explain the semantic aspects of words and according to these aspects and semantic differences are explained, examine and evaluate the approach of translators and interpreters, and at the end provide a suitable lexical equivalent in Persian translation ; The results of the research show that the word violation has an auditory and vocal concept that has no exact equivalent in Persian and the two words covenant and covenant are not synonymous that should be reflected in translations.

Andarznameh Ardeshir is a collection of advices attributed to Artaxerxes ɪ of Sassanid dynasty and said to have been left for his descendants. It has been longer than the present version and provided a more detailed model for the Sassanid kings and later, through its translation into Arabic, for the Muslim rulers. In the early Islamic centuries, Andarznameh was mostly known as Ahd-e Ardeshir, and it is believed that there had not been a whole version of it at that time as well. In order to shift Seljuk’s tribal view to Iranian governmental model, Khajeh Nizam al-Mulk wrote Siasatnameh. Ahd-e Ardeshir was an important source for Khajeh Nizam al-Mulk, in whose time the Arabic version was available. He has brought quotations from Ahd-e Ardeshir that that indicate his access to and adaptions from it. In many arguments of Siasatnameh, including the parts containing charecteristics of Sultan, devotedness to religion, and principles of statesmanship one can see adaptations of Ardeshir’s advices.
This study is an analytical approach to investigate the attribution of Andarznameh to Ardeshir, and the status of Ahd-e Ardeshir in the early Islamic centuries, and an attempt to trace the advices of Ardeshir in Khajeh Nizam al-Mlk’s Siasatnameh.

The article of “al” (Alif & lam) is the most frequent letter in Arabic. While infering different meanings, it uccurs at different contexts. Somewhen it is applied to reveale the substance of the word sticked to it, as well as it sometimes portrays the sticked word to be a known object. Each of these two kinds of Alif & Lam has its own types. The different interpretation of the meaning of “al” in everey Arabic word sticked to it, may lead to misunderstanding of the sentence, as well as it led to variant interpretations of Quranic text; especially while Muslim exegetes tend to defend the eternity of Quranic decrees and propositions. As a result, Muslim interpretors often tend to consider every Alif & Lam in Quran as an article signifying the substance, which means they tend not to accept most of “al”s as an indicator to the known object. In order to show the impact of this theological hypothesis on grammatical analysis of Quranic text, this study aims to show the possibility of different interpretation of these sentences as far as concerns to the status of Alif & Lam in the related words.

According to some theories of the philosophy of political history، civilization is formed when collective challenges and disputes about a public issue is resolved in a non-hostile way. Formation of civilization is highly related to government and bureaucratic structures، which themselves are established based on philosophical-religious، mythical، cultural-intellectual and concrete structures. In this way، politics can be regarded as the art of making things possible using power technologies. The present paper aims to study the Iranshari (''Iranian'') politics in Sassanid era. From this point of view، the aspects and dimensions of Iranshahri’s theory of government is explained through the semantic content analysis of two famous books of political advice، namely Ahd-e Ardeshir and Letter of Tansar. In doing so، linear and orientalist theories were put aside and Iran was considered an ancient civilization with valuable political heritage. The primary research question was: What were the intellectual causes of the rise and fall of the Sassanid dynasty? According to Iranshahri’s theory of government، there were two periods of rise (Ahd-e Ardeshir) and fall (Letter of Tansar) in the Sassanid era. The present paper attempts to investigate the curve of evolution in order to identify the political techniques involved in the rise and fall of the Sassanid dynasty.