جستجوی مقالات مرتبط با کلیدواژه « رورتی » در نشریات گروه « هنر و معماری »

Disorder in the facade of residential buildings in contemporary cities are issues that are mentioned a lot in the literature of architecture and urban planning. Managers and urban designers believe that the design factors and individualism of contemporary architects is one of the effective factors in creating the above situation. For this purpose, solutions and laws have been established in the form of architecture and in terms of form and visual in order to control and intervene to improve the current situation, which seems to have not had the necessary efficiency and acceptability in practice. This research is in search of a theoretical framework for a deeper understanding of the issue and rereading and explaining it again, which seeks to strengthen human togetherness and solidarity by accepting the inevitable reality of individualism in the contemporary era. a framework that can rely on the importance of the facade as a face that the owner and designer of the building imagine for themselves, change the way architects think in defining themselves and its effect in the interpretation phase of the facade problem and its framing, and as a point of departure in the design process. Based on pragmatic epistemology and the theories and methods proposed by Richard Rorty, this research is looking for a theoretical solution specific to the present time. The present research has been done in a qualitative way and by observing the current situation and relying on library studies. At the end, empathy with the other is suggested as a way to develop the concept of self (designer-owner), thinking and creating solidarity in the face of residential buildings. An idea that is based on collaborative and user-oriented designs in architecture and by expanding its scope in the design of residential facades, it encourages coexistence instead of competition with others in neighborhood spaces.

Richard Rorty is regarded as a contemporary thinker who critically, but in a different way from Habermas and Foucault, attacks to theoretical system of western classical philosophy and challenges certain modern philosophical perspectives in western philosophy. In so doing, he accuses philosophy, both old and new, to Representationalism, Fundamentalism, Absolutism, separation of philosophy from life and truth from meaning. Inspired by Heidegger, Darwin, Wittgenstein, Davidson, Nietzsche, he makes a creative theoretical combination which aims at re-reading knowledge, method and truth in the context of life. The philosophy of Rorty is concerned with overcoming conventional gaps between continental and analytical philosophies in order to keep philosophy away from inadequate theoretical and conceptual dualisms. Thus, going beyond the terminology of current philosophical approaches, Rorty intends to bring the philosophy into the historical contexts and everyday life settings so that it can be used as an instrument for problem solving in social life. For Rorty, philosophy not only refers to an academic enterprise but also it is considered as a tool to solve problem or to perceive something in practice. This paper seeks to both explore and criticize the ideas and thoughts of thinkers influencing Rorty philosophy. Then, describing the main theoretical underpinnings of Rorty theoretical system, it makes effort to clarify the theoretical and methodological contributions of Rorty to contemporary western philosophy.