جستجوی مقالات مرتبط با کلیدواژه « میدان هروی » در نشریات گروه « هنر و معماری »

Human habitation and settlement has been a vital and integral part of all of human life. Since the quality of life does not make sense without the quality of the environment in which we live, so it can be said that the quality of the living environment is part of the quality of life and includes all the factors that form part of human satisfaction with the environment. The main purpose of this study is to gain sufficient knowledge of the residential situation and finally analyze the quality of life of the residents of Heravi Square neighborhood. The present article seeks to analyze the quality of housing in this area from two descriptive and analytical dimensions and by designing a questionnaire. The research method in this research is factor analysis with AHP technique by expert choice software whose reliability of the questionnaire was evaluated through Cronbach's alpha with SPSS software and its validity was evaluated by Waltz and Basel method. Also, field perceptions of housing factors and using residents' opinions through a questionnaire and its analysis are information sources and data of this research. Finally, by reviewing and comparing the results of these two data sources, the strengths, weaknesses and problems of this field will be analyzed. Heravi Square is located in the fourth and third districts of Tehran Municipality and in the northeastern part of the city. In terms of location and location of the square around important uses and major highways such as Imam Ali Highway and Sayad Shirazi and other reasons, the need to check the residential situation and the level of satisfaction of residents in this area is clear. Findings of this study show that the criterion of health has the greatest impact and the criterion of physical environment has the least impact on quality of life in Heravi Square. As a result of this research, more planning and efforts should be made for the two criteria of health and safety in this area. Also, at the end, according to the results and criteria, to improve the quality of life of residents, suggestions are provided.

Problem Statement: 

Designing cities without the participation of the people will provide a passive, inhuman and boring city whose citizens will be indifferent to the future of the city. Therefore, given the complexity of contemporary cities and the inefficiency of traditional methods, providing appropriate methods and tools for better communication, co-operation and collaboration between experts and residents of a metropolitan area seems necessary.

The concept of citizenship participation is directly related to the concept of democracy, and its importance becomes evident when the active citizen is manifested in the city and the development of the city is achieved through cooperation and participation of people. In this case, the citizen is considered to be anactor who actively tries to determine his / her fate and attains a desirable status, and the future of the city is considered important to him / her. This can be the ultimate goal of a participant-oriented city, and it is important to note that this concept should be applied to the urban design process and programs.

The present research has a theoretical-practical structure. To answer the research concern, the “analytical-adaptive” method has been used to analyze the opinions of the people and experts and to adapt to the principles and process of urban design. Also, it has used direct methods, indirect methods, group engagement and mental storms to take advantage of public participation.

The results of the research indicate that in general the opinions of experts and people who use an urban place can be different, coordinated and sometimes contradictory. Therefore, the important thing is the right to express oneself by all users and actors of a place. An urban design expert as a catalyst can accelerate and facilitate this process. This research presents a model in the form of a study of the Heravi Square, a process for designing urban space with the participation of people and experts and in terms of collaborative participatory design methods. This process consists of three main stages: (1) public information, (2) design workshops, (3) feedback. Keywords: Collaborative Urban Design, Collaborative Partnerships, Public information, Feedback, Heravi Square.