جستجوی مقالات مرتبط با کلیدواژه "diabetes distress" در نشریات گروه "پزشکی"
-
فصلنامه پرستاری دیابت، سال یازدهم شماره 1 (زمستان 1401)، صص 2039 -2056مقدمه و هدف
یکی از بیماریهای مزمن دیابت نوع 2 است. که از عوامل روانشناختی تاثیرگذار در مدیریت آن پریشانی دیابت است. لذا هدف از این پژوهش مقایسه تاثیر خودشفابخشی با درمان شناختی رفتاری تلفیق با ذهن آگاهی بر پریشانی دیابت و کنترل قند خون بیماران مبتلا به دیابت نوع 2 می باشد.
روش پژوهش:
این پژوهش نیمه تجربی بر روی 60 نفر مبتلا به دیابت نوع 2 که به صورت هدفمند انتخاب شده بودند انجام گرفت. افراد به طور تصادفی در دوگروه مداخله و یک گروه کنترل قرار گرفتند. گروه های مداخله 12 جلسه 90 دقیقه ای (هفته ای یک جلسه) درمان شناختی رفتاری تلفیق با ذهن آگاهی و خودشفابخشی دریافت کردند. ابزار پژوهش پرسشنامه پریشانی دیابت پولونسکی و همکاران (2005) که دارای روایی محتوا و پایایی با آلفای کرونباخ 0/87 می باشد و تجهیزات آزمایشگاهی جهت اندازه گیری هموگلوبین گلیکوزید بود. داده ها با استفاده از تحلیل واریانس با اندازه گیری مکرر و آزمون تعقیبی در نرم افزار SPSS-24 تجزیه و تحلیل شد.
یافته هااز بین دو شیوه مداخله فقط خودشفابخشی توانست به طور موثری سبب کاهش هموگلوبین گلیکوزیدی شود. همچنین هر دو شیوه مداخله باعث کاهش پریشانی دیابت شد ولی اثر خودشفابخشی در طول زمان ثابت باقی ماند.
نتیجه گیرینتایج حاکی از آن است که خودشفابخشی توانست علاوه بر پریشانی دیابت هموگلوبین گلیکوزید را هم کاهش دهد و اثر آن در طول زمان ثابت باقی ماند. پیشنهاد می شود اثر خودشفابخشی در سایر زمینه های مرتبط با دیابت بررسی شود.
کلید واژگان: خودشفابخشی, درمان شناختی رفتاری تلفیق با ذهن آگاهی, پریشانی دیابت, هموگلوبین گلیکوزید, دیابت نوع 2Journal of Diabetes Nursing, Volume:11 Issue: 1, 2023, PP 2039 -2056IntroductionType II diabetes is one of the chronic diseases, and diabetes distress is one of the psychological factors affecting its management. Therefore, this study was performed to compare the effectiveness of self-healing with mindfulness-integrated cognitive behavior therapy on diabetes distress and control of glycemic in type II diabetic patients
MethodsThis semi-experimental research was conducted on 60 people with type II diabetes who were selected purposefully. People were randomly divided into two intervention groups and one control group. The intervention groups received twelve 90-minute sessions (one session per week) of mindfulness-integrated cognitive behavior therapy and self-healing. The research tools were Polonsky et al.'s Diabetes Distress Scale (2005), which has content validity and reliability with a Cronbach's alpha of 0.87, and laboratory equipment to measure hemoglobin glycoside. The data were analyzed using variance analysis with repeated measurements and post hoc tests in SPSS-24 software.
ResultsBetween the two methods of intervention, only self-healing could effectively reduce glycosidic hemoglobin (P≤0.01). Moreover, both methods of intervention reduced diabetes distress; however, the effect of self-healing remained stable over time (P≤0.01).
ConclusionThe results indicated that self-healing was able to reduce hemoglobin glycoside in addition to diabetes distress and its effect remained constant over time. It is suggested to investigate the effect of self-healing in other areas related to diabetes.
Keywords: Diabetes distress, Diabetes type II, Glycosylated hemoglobin, Mindfulness-integrated Cognitive Behavior Therapy, Self-healing -
Objectives
This study was performed to investigate whether social support and other psychological predictors were associated with physical activity during the prolonged social isolation due to the coronavirus disease 2019 outbreak in Iran.
MethodsThis cross-sectional study was performed on 494 individuals with type 2 diabetes (T2D) in a diabetes specialty clinic. The questionnaire package comprised five parts, including sociodemographic and clinical characteristics, physical activity level, diabetes-specific social support, feelings of isolation, and diabetes-related distress. Clinical and hemoglobin A1c data were obtained from electronic medical records. Descriptive statistics, Pearson’s chi-square test, and multivariable logistic regressions were conducted to analyze the data.
ResultsApproximately 71% of the participants participated in low/insufficient levels of physical activity. The participants who received support from family/friends (odds ratio [OR] = 1.77; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.47 - 2.74), diabetes care team (OR = 1.42; 95% CI: 1.15 - 1.77), and neighbors (OR = 1.53; 95% CI: 1.20 - 2.08) were more likely to have sufficient physical activity than those who did not receive these supports. There was also an association between physical activity behavior with feelings of isolation and diabetes distress.
ConclusionsThis study points to the importance of social support as an amplifier mechanism for the maintenance of physical activity behavior in individuals with T2D during critical times.
Keywords: COVID-19 Pandemic, Type 2 Diabetes, Physical Activity, Social Support, Diabetes Distress, Social Isolation -
Background
Diabetes distress (DD) is common among the patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D), but few studies investigated this problem and its related factors in the elderly population. This study has focused on the prevalence rate of DD and its determinants in community‑dwelling elderly in Qom, Iran.
MethodsThis study was cross‑sectional. A total of 519 subjects community‑dwelling with T2D participated in the study. Collected data contained sociodemographic information, some clinical variables (body mass index and duration of diabetes) knowledge, attitude, and self‑efficacy. Participants’ distress was measured via diabetes distress scale (DDS). The cut of 3 (≥3) was considered as the presence of distress. Also, the attitude, self‑efficacy, and knowledge about diabetes were measured by questioner. Multiple logistic regression analysis was applied to detect predictors of DD.
ResultsThe mean age of the participants was 68.38 ± 6.78 and 53.6% were female. Among the participants, 48.6% were identified with positive DD. According to the results of logistic regression analysis, being female (odds ration [OR] = 1.688, P = 0.009), being widowed or divorced (OR = 1.629, P = 0.027), being over‑weight or obese (OR = 1.627, P = 0.027), and having less than 10 years in disease duration (OR = 1.721, P = 0.029), attitude (OR = 0.590, P < 0.001), and self‑efficacy (OR = 0.658, P = 0.009) were identified as the independent predictors of DD. No significant association was found between DD and age, occupational status, education level, and knowledge (P > 0.05).
ConclusionsThe prevalence of DD is considerable among the elderly in Qom. It seems that more attention should be paid to the mental aspects of the patients with T2D specially in high risk groups.
Keywords: Determinants, diabetes distress, elderly, prevalence, Qom -
Introduction
Considering the chronic nature of diabetes and its significant effect on quality of life of patients, the present study was conducted to evaluate predictors of quality of life in these patients in order to facilitate planning health promotion intervention programs.
Materials and MethodsThe present study was designed as a cross‑sectional study on 140 type 2 diabetic patients of Om‑ol‑Banin Diabetes Center of Isfahan. Data collection tool was a multidimensional questionnaire including demographic and disease related data (12 items), the standard scale for diabetes distress (17 items), the standard scale for self‑efficacy in diabetic patients (8 items), and standard scale for specific quality of life of diabetic patients (15 items). Collected data were evaluated by SPSS version 11.5 using the Chi‑square test, Independent T‑test, ANOVA, Pearson correlation and multivariate regression analysis.
ResultsResults showed that the quality of life of diabetic patients had a statistically significant correlation with diabetes distress variable (P < 0.001) and self‑efficacy variable (P < 0.001). In this study R2 (predictive power) was 0.66. Multivariate regression model indicated diabetes distress (b = ‑0.277, P = 0.01) and self‑efficacy (b = ‑0.161, P < 0.001) as variables influencing adjusted self‑management for other variables.
ConclusionThe result of the present study urges that in planning health promotion interventions in the field of diabetes, more attention be paid to self‑efficacy and diabetes distress variables in order to improve the efficiency and effectiveness of the interventions carried out.
Keywords: Diabetes distress, predictive factors, quality of life, self‑efficacy, type 2 diabetes -
Background
The purpose of this study was to assess self-care practices and their relative components among type 2 diabetic patients. We hypothesized that some sociodemographic and health-related factors, high diabetes distress, and low self-efficacy would be associated with poorer self-care practices.
Materials and MethodsA cross-sectional study was conducted for a period of 6 months in 2011. Study population was type 2 diabetic patients referring to Omolbanin center, an outpatient diabetic center in Isfahan. One hundred forty diabetic patients met the inclusion criteria and were all included in the study. Patients' self-care practices were measured by Summary of Diabetes Self-care Activities (SDSCA) self-report scale that includes items on the following aspects of the diabetes regimen: General diet, specific diet, exercise, blood glucose testing, foot care, medications, and smoking. Diabetes distress measured by Diabetes Distress Scale (DDS) scale and Stanford diabetes self-efficacy scale was used for scoring this issue. Collected data were analyzed by using SPSS software version 11.5.
ResultsParticipants were between the ages of 37 and 75 years, with a mean of 53.23 years (SD=7.82). Fifty-four percent (n=76) were females; 97.1% were married (n=136), and 53.6% had education lower than diploma (n=75). Mean of duration of diabetes was 7.1 (SD=5.63) years. "Medications" subscale was considered as the most important one in measuring diabetes self-care practices (5.24 ± 2.38 days/week). Study findings revealed that general diet had significant relation with comorbidity, type of treatment, body mass index (BMI), fasting blood sugar (FBS), (Blood Sugar) (BS), waist circumference, diabetes distress, and self-efficacy. Specific diet had significant relation with comorbidity, education, triglyceride (TG), diastolic blood pressure (DBP), and low density lipoprotein (LDL). Exercise showed significant relation with history of diabetes, education, type of treatment, disease duration, TG, BMI, and BS. Also, blood glucose testing showed significant relation with disease duration, self-efficacy, TG, DBP, BS, LDL, and high density lipoprotein (HDL). On the other hand, foot care was related to age, diabetes distress, TG, BMI, HDL, and diabetes complications. Medications subscale as the most important subscale of self-care practices was relevant with age, disease duration, diabetes complications, type of treatment, FBS, HDL, and self-efficacy. The last subscale, smoking, had significant relation with sex, diabetes complications, diabetes distress, self-efficacy, TG, total cholesterol, BS, and HDL.
ConclusionThis information should be used in clinical practice when targeting and designing educational and care plan for patients with type 2 diabetes.
Keywords: Diabetes distress, self-care, self-efficacy, type 2 diabetes
- نتایج بر اساس تاریخ انتشار مرتب شدهاند.
- کلیدواژه مورد نظر شما تنها در فیلد کلیدواژگان مقالات جستجو شدهاست. به منظور حذف نتایج غیر مرتبط، جستجو تنها در مقالات مجلاتی انجام شده که با مجله ماخذ هم موضوع هستند.
- در صورتی که میخواهید جستجو را در همه موضوعات و با شرایط دیگر تکرار کنید به صفحه جستجوی پیشرفته مجلات مراجعه کنید.