به جمع مشترکان مگیران بپیوندید!

تنها با پرداخت 70 هزارتومان حق اشتراک سالانه به متن مقالات دسترسی داشته باشید و 100 مقاله را بدون هزینه دیگری دریافت کنید.

برای پرداخت حق اشتراک اگر عضو هستید وارد شوید در غیر این صورت حساب کاربری جدید ایجاد کنید

عضویت

جستجوی مقالات مرتبط با کلیدواژه « paroxetine » در نشریات گروه « پزشکی »

  • Jaspreet Kaur Sidhu *, Kiran Jakhar, Deepti Chopra, Aditi Dhote, Vishakha Babber, Mohammad Shadman, C. D. Tripathi
    Objective

    Psychiatric disorders are chronic in nature which require medications for a long duration. These medications have been associated with many adverse events. Failure to recognize an adverse drug reaction (ADR) exposes the patient to continuing risk of ADR, leading to a significant impact on patient’s quality of life. Thus, the present study carried out to identify the pattern of ADRs reported due to psychotropic medication.

    Methods

    This was a cross‑sectional study conducted to analyze ADRs reported from the psychiatry department of a tertiary care teaching hospital from October 2021 to March 2022.

    Findings

    A total of 137 ADRs were identified from 102 patients. Majority of the ADRs were reported from antidepressants, with paroxetine being the leading offending drug. The central nervous system was most commonly affected, and dizziness (13.13%) was the most common ADR noted. On causality assessment, 97 ADRs (70.8%) were of “possible” type. Almost half of the patients with ADRs (47.5%) recovered spontaneously. No ADR encountered turned out to be fatal.

    Conclusion

    The present study revealed that the majority of ADRs reported from psychiatry OPD were mild in nature. We reinforce the identification of ADR is crucial in the hospital setting process as it gives an insight into the risk‑benefit ratio for rational use of the drug.

    Keywords: Adverse drug reactions, adverse event, antidepressants, Paroxetine}
  • Hamed Mohseni Rad, Telma Zahirian Moghadam, Ali Hosseinkhani*, Nima Soluki, Firouz Amani
    Purpose

    The purpose of this study was to compare the effectiveness of Dapoxetine, and Paroxetine as well as Dapoxetine/Tadalafil and Paroxetine/Tadalafil combinational therapies, for the treatment of patients with prema-ture ejaculation.

    Materials and Methods

    In this clinical trial study, 120 patients with premature ejaculation were randomly divided into 4 groups: The first group was treated with Paroxetine (Pa), while the second group received Dapoxetine(Da). The third group received Paroxetine combined with Tadalafil(PT) whereas the fourth group's treatment involved the use of Dapoxetine and Tadalafil(DT) for one month. In the next 2 and 4 weeks, the cases were evaluated in terms of ejaculation duration, frequency of intercourse per week, and drug side effects.

    Results

    The mean age of the Da, Pa, PT, DT groups was 32 ± 6.9, 32.4 ± 7.2, 31.6 ± 1.9, and 32.9 ± 7.7 years, respectively. There was a significant difference between the Da and DT groups (p = .029) in the ejaculation latency in the 4-week follow-up. In the two weeks follow-up, a significant difference was observed between DA and DT (p = 0.043), Pa and PT (p = 0.006), and Pa and DT groups (p = 0.004) in terms of ejaculation latency. Four weeks after the intervention, a significant difference was detected in the intercourse frequency of Da and PT groups (p =0.033), Pa and PT groups (p = 0.043), Pa and DT groups (p = 0.02), and Da and DT groups (p = 0.016).

    Conclusion

    Combination therapy (Tadalafil plus Paroxetine or Dapoxetine) was more effective in IELT (Intra ejaculation latency time) than mono-therapy especially in younger patients despite its slightly more side effects.

    Keywords: Dapoxetine, paroxetine, premature ejaculation, tadalafil, treatment}
  • فاطمه گنجعلیشاهی، آناهید همت پور، مهدی دهقان منشادی، حسین هادی ندوشن، علیرضا کریم الله*
    زمینه

    پاروکستین یکی از شناخته شده‌ترین داروها بین داروهای ضدافسردگی است. مطالعات اخیر بر اثرات احتمالی تعدیل کنندگی ایمنی پاروکستین تمرکز کرده‌اند چرا که یافته‌ها نقش التهاب را در پاتوفیزیولوژی افسردگی نشان دادند. لذا در مطالعه حاضر بیان ژن‌های TLR2 و TLR4 در سلول‌های تک هسته‌ای خون محیطی تحت تیمار با پاروکستین سنجیده شد.

    روش‌ کار: 

    مطالعه حاضر از نوع بنیادی- کاربردی است. از 5 مرد سالم (20-40 سال) خونگیری وریدی انجام گرفت و سلول‌های تک هسته‌ای خون محیطی (PBMC) از نمونه‌ها جداسازی و کشت داده شدند. پس از انکوباسیون اولیه به مدت 24 ساعت، LPS+PHA به سلول‌ها افزوده شد و 24 ساعت انکوبه شدند. سپس سلول‌ها تحت تیمار با غلظت‌های متفاوت از داروی پاروکستین در حضور یا عدم حضور مهار کننده 5-HT2R و 5-HT7R قرار گرفتند. بعد از انکوباسیون به مدت 48 ساعت، RNA استخراج گردید و cDNA سنتز شد. با استفاده از تکنیک Real-time PCR، بیان ژن‌های TLR4 و TLR2 اندازه‌گیری شد. تحلیل آماری نتایج با استفاده از نرم‌افزار GraphPad Prism7 انجام شد.

    یافته‌ ها: 

    بیان mRNA ژن‌های TLR2 و TLR4 به‌طور معنادار در پاسخ به تیمار با پاروکستین در همه غلظت‌ها افزایش یافت. علاوه بر این، تیمار همزمان سلول‌ها با دارو و مهارکننده گیرنده سروتونینی 2 و 7 نشان داد که اثر پاروکستین بر سلول‌های ایمنی بواسطه TLR2 به سیستم سروتونینی وابسته است. در حالی‌که در مورد اثر TLR4، مستقل از سروتونین است.

    نتیجه‌گیری: 

    با توجه به اثر داروی پاروکستین در تعدیل پاسخ‌های التهابی به واسطه افزایش بیان ژن‌های TLR2 و TLR4، این دارو دارای توانایی بالقوه در درمان بیماری‌های مرتبط با نقص در این گیرنده‌ها خواهد بود.

    کلید واژگان: پاروکستین, PBMC, TLR2, TLR4}
    Fatemeh Ganjalishahi, Anahid Hemmatpour, Mahdi Dehghan Manshadi, Hossein Hadi Nedoushan, Alireza Karimollah*
    Background

    Paroxetine is one of the well-known antidepressants. Recent studies have focused on paroxetine’s probable immuno-modulatory effects, since findings have indicated inflammation’s role in the pathophysiology of depression. Therefore, in the present study, TLR2 and TLR4 mRNA genes expression was assessed in paroxetinetreated peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs).

    Methods

    Venous blood samples were drawn from five healthy men (20-40 years old). Peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) were isolated from samples and were cultured. After the first incubation for 24h, phytohemagglutinin plus lipopolysaccharide were added to the cells and then were incubated for 24h. Thereafter, cells were treated with different concentrations of paroxetine in the presence or absence of inhibitors of 5-HT2 and 5- HT7 receptors. After incubation for 48h, RNA was extracted and cDNA was synthesized. Using the real-Time PCR technique, TLR2 and TLR4 genes mRNA expression were evaluated. Statistical analysis of data were carried out using GraphPad Prism 7.

    Results

    TLR2 and TLR4 mRNA expression were significantly increased in response to paroxetine at all concentrations. Furthermore, the co-culture of cells with the drug and the 5-HT2R and 5HT7R inhibitor simultaneously revealed that paroxetine’s immuno-modulatory effects via TLR2 are dependent on serotonin, while it is independent of serotonin in the case of TLR4.

    Conclusion

    Considering paroxetine’s effect in modulating immune responses via increasing TLR2 and TLR4 expression, paroxetine could have therapeutic potentials in diseases with a deficiency in these receptors.

    Keywords: Paroxetine, PBMC, TLR2, TLR4}
  • Alireza Karimollah*, Anahid Hemmatpur, Maryam Asadi, Mohammad Hossein Hadinedoushan
    Background

    Paroxetine has been a commonly prescribed antidepressant for treatment of major depression and various anxiety disorders for almost 30 years due to its fewer side effects and toxicity compared with its counterparts. Despite several investigations performed, the paroxetine immunoregulatory effect in healthy subjects is still controversial. In this study, the paroxetine effect on the cell proliferation along with IL-4 and interferon-gamma (IFN-γ) secretion in peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) of physically and mentally healthy subjects is investigated.

    Materials and Methods

    Blood was drawn from 20 healthy subjects and PBMCs were isolated. Cells were treated with paroxetine and/or phytohemagglutinin (PHA) for 72 h. IL-4 and IFN-γ concentrations were assessed in the supernatant using an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. The BrdU cell proliferation assay was also performed to evaluate the paroxetine effect on PBMCs in the absence or presence of PHA.

    Results

    Paroxetine (25 μM) significantly inhibited the production of IL-4 and IFN-γ in PHA-stimulated human PBMC cultures. Surprisingly, paroxetine suppressed cell proliferation in the unstimulated culture in a dose-independent manner. Paroxetine also attenuated cell proliferation in the PHA-stimulated culture, especially at 25 μM concentration.

    Conclusion

    The obtained results suggest that paroxetine can be a potent therapeutic option in inflammatory diseases by balancing immune responses.

    Keywords: Cell proliferation, IFN-γ, IL-4, paroxetine, PBMC}
  • Malek Zarei, Masoumeh Sabetkasaei*, Taraneh Moini-Zanjani
    Background

    Neuropathic pain due to damage to the peripheral nerve has influenced millions of people living all over the world. It has been shown that paroxetine can relieve neuropathic pain. Recently, the role of some proteins like BDNF, GABAA receptor, and KCC2 transporter in the occurrence of neuropathic pain has been documented. In the current study, the expression of these proteins affected by paroxetine was evaluated.

    Methods

    Male Wistar rats were allocated into two main groups ofpre- and post-injury. Rats in each main group received paroxetine before nerve injury and at day seven after nerve damage till day 14, respectively. The lumbar spinal cord of animals was extracted to assess the expression of target genes and proteins.

    Results

    In the preventive study, paroxetine decreased BDNF and increased KCC2 and GABAA gene and protein expression, while in the post-injury paradigm, it decreased BDNF and increased KCC2 genes and protein expression. In this regard, an increase in the protein expression of GABAA was observed.

    Conclusion

    It seems that paroxetine with a change in the expression of three significant proteins involved in neuropathic pain could attenuate this type of chronic pain.

    Keywords: Brain-derived neurotrophic factor, Gamma-aminobutyric acid, Paroxetine}
  • Maryam Mousavi, Padideh Ghaeli, Fanak Fahimi*
    Rare cases of akathisia have been reported with paroxetine in the literature. However, accurate diagnosis for early treatment is important since untreated akathisia can result in poor patient’s compliance, treatment failure, aggressive or suicidal acts. We present a case of a 25-year- old female patient, suffering from akathisia, who was treated with paroxetine and olanzapine due to hypomania and general anxiety disorder. Our finding shows that side effects like akathisia could be addressed by the timing of the peak level of paroxetine. Thus, shifting the time of paroxetine consumption to reach its peak level at the sleeping period could be a rational approach for many patients. More research is required to confirm that the observation of this case report was not accidental.
    Keywords: Paroxetine, Akathisia, Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitor}
  • Abdulla Homayuonfar, Alireza Aminsharifi, Alireza Salehi, Ali Sahraian, Shadab Dehshari, Mohsen Bahrami
    Background

    This randomized clinical trial was aimed to evaluate the effect of oral use of tamarind seed powder as an herbal product in patients affected by premature ejaculation (PE).

    Materials and Methods

    In this study, 75 patients randomized in tamarind group (25 patients received daily 130 mg tamarind seed powder), paroxetine group (25 patients received daily 20 mg paroxetine), and placebo group (25 patients). Patients received the treatment regimen for 4 weeks. The primary outcome was intravaginal ejaculatory latency time (IELT). The secondary outcomes were PE diagnostic tool score, sexual function using International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF), and complications. Studied sexual functions include erectile function, orgasmic function, sexual desire, intercourse satisfaction, and overall satisfaction.

    Results

    The mean of IELT in tamarind, paroxetine, and placebo groups at baseline was 35.2 ± 26.5, 38 ± 27.6, and 44 ± 34.9 s and at the end of study was 49.5 ± 48.2, 147.4 ± 209.6, and 46.9 ± 37.6 s, respectively, which in paroxetine group signifi cantly increased compared to other groups. IIEF scores for orgasmic function and intercourse satisfaction for paroxetine after treatment signifi cantly increased than that of other groups. The differences between tamarind and placebo groups for studied variables were not statistically signifi cant. The mean of increases in IELT for tamarind, paroxetine, and placebo groups was 14.35 ± 34.3, 109.4 ± 213.4, and 2.9 ± 9.3 s, respectively, which in paroxetine group was signifi cantly higher than other groups and in tamarind group was signifi cantly higher than placebo.

    Conclusions

    Paroxetine was signifi cantly better than tamarind seed powder and placebo although side effect in paroxetine was more frequent. IELT signifi cantly more increased in tamarind group compared to placebo.

    Keywords: Complementary medicine, paroxetine, premature ejaculation, tamarind seed, Tamarindus indica}
  • Ali Hamidi-Madani, Reza Motiee *, Gholamreza Mokhtari, Hamidreza Nasseh, Samaneh Esmaeili, Ehsan Kazemnezhad
    Background
    Several medical therapies have been proposed for the treatment of premature ejaculation (PE). Paroxetine and tramadol were both reported to be effective in treatment of PE. In this study, the therapeutic effects of tramadol, paroxetine and placebo were compared in treatment of primary PE.
    Methods
    In this randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial, 150 patients were divided into 3 groups. One group was treated with tramadol 50 mg on- demand, the other group took paroxetine 20 mg on-demand and the third group was treated with placebo. Before starting treatment and after 12 weeks, patients were asked to measure their average intravaginal ejaculation latency time (IELT) and fill the PEP (Premature Ejaculation Profile) questionnaire.
    Results
    At the end of the 12th week, the mean IELT and average of PEP scores improved in all 3 groups. The increase in tramadol group was significantly higher than the paroxetine and placebo groups (p
    Conclusion
    The results showed that despite an increase in mean IELT and PEP scores in all 3 groups, the rate of improvement in tramadol group was significantly more than the others. Thus, tramadol may be considered as an appropriate alternative therapeutic option for lifelong PE.
    Keywords: IELT, Paroxetine, PEP, Premature ejaculation, Tramadol}
  • Yazdan Naderi, Siavash Parvardeh, Taraneh Moini Zanjani, Masoumeh Sabetkasaei *
    Aims:Memory deficit is the most visible symptom of cerebral ischemia. The hippocampus is sensitive against cerebral ischemia. Oxidative stress and inflammation are involved in the pathological process after cerebral ischemic injury. Paroxetine has anti-oxidative and anti-inflammatory effects. In this study the effect of paroxetine on memory deficit after cerebral ischemia was investigated.
    Methods
    Cerebral ischemia/reperfusion (I/R) injury model was established using the bilateral occlusion of common carotid artery method. Paroxetine (10 mg/kg) was intraperitoneally injected into rats, 24 hours before surgery or once a day for 7 days after surgery. Learning and memory were evaluated using the Morris water maze task, then the brain tissue was fixed and hippocampal CA1 pyramidal cells damage was analyzed using the Nissl staining method.
    Results
    In the ischemia group the escape latency time (ELT) and the swimming path length (SPL) were significantly increased and the time spent in target quadrant (TSTQ) was significantly decreased compared with the control group. The ELT and the SPL were significantly shortened and the TSTQ was significantly increased compared with the ischemia group after Pre- or post-ischemic administration of paroxetine. The percentage of viable pyramidal cells in the ischemia group was significantly decreased compared with the control group. The percentage of viable cells was significantly increased following pre-or post-ischemic administration of paroxetine compared with the ischemia group.
    Conclusion
    Memory deficit due to I/R was improved and the percentage of viable cells in CA1 region was increased after administration of paroxetine. Therefore, paroxetine may have a neuroprotective effect against cerebral ischemia.
    Keywords: Paroxetine, Memory, Morris Water Maze, Cerebral ischemia, Neuroprtection}
  • K. Aghakhani, S. Soltani, N. Farhidnia, F. Fallah
    Background
    Children and adolescents are prone to develop psychiatric problems after stressful life events. These problems need appropriate treatment because of negative consequences like disease-related suicide. Antidepressants (especially "Serotonin Selective Reuptake Inhibitors") are common treatments for psychiatric problems of children and adolescents; but different side effects, including drug-induced suicide, have been reported.
    Case Report: In this article, we describe a nine-year-old girl who developed depression after parental divorce and was prescribed paroxetine. During pharmacotherapy, she had suicidal thoughts and several unsuccessful attempts which have been neglected and finally last attempt was successful. This report is an evidence for physicians to prescribe antidepressants cautiously with reasonable indication. As still there is no certain contraindication of using antidepressants in pediatric patients, importance of follow-ups and screening of suicide in pediatric patients during treatment with antidepressants seems essential.
    Conclusion
    This study discloses the magnitude of explaining the side effects of antidepressants to caregivers of children with psychiatric problems.
    Keywords
    Keywords: Antidepressive Agents, Depression, Paroxetine, Suicide}
  • Maliheh Jahromi, Shahnaz Razavi, Nushin Amirpour, Zahra Khosravizadeh
    Background
    Some antidepressant drugs can promote neuronal cell proliferation in vitro as well as hippocampal neurogenesis in human and animal models. Furthermore, adipose tissue is an available source of adult stem cells with the ability to differentiate in to multiple lineages. Therefore, human Adipose-Derived Stem Cells (hADSCs) may be a suitable source for regenerative medical applications. Since there is no evidence for the effect of Paroxetine as the most commonly prescribed antidepressant drug for neurogenic potential of hADSCs, an attempt was made to determine the effect of Paroxetine on proliferation and neural differentiation of hADSCs.
    Methods
    ADSCs were isolated from human abdominal fat. These cells differentiated to neuron-like cells and were treated with Paroxetine. 3-[4, 5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl]-2, 5-diphenyl tetrazolium bromide (MTT) assay and immunofluorescence technique were used for assessment of cell proliferation and neurogenic differentiation potential of induced cells, respectively.
    Results
    MTT assay analysis showed that Paroxetine significantly increased the proliferation rate of induced hADSCs (p
    Conclusion
    Our results provide evidence that Paroxetine can promote proliferation and differentiation rate during neurogenic differentiation of hADSCs. Moreover, Paroxetine can reduce gliogenesis of induced hADSCs during neurogenic differentiation.
    Keywords: Antidepressant drugs, Neurogenic differentiation, Paroxetine, Proliferation, Stem cells}
  • Feizy Fariba, Sayyah Mehdi *
    Obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) is a debilitating chronic disease with an estimated prevalence rate of 2 to 3 percent in the general population. The first patient was a 34-year-old female with a diagnosis of OCD according to DSM-V from about seven years ago with the Yale-Brown score 31. She referred to our center with simultaneous infertility and PCO since 11 years. The second patient was a 32-year-old female with a diagnosis of OCD according to DSM-V with Yale-Brown score 34 since 5 years ago. In two patients, paroxetine may lead to successful pregnancy in addition to reducing the OCD symptoms. According to this initial report and the randomness of pregnancy in patient treated with paroxetine, there may be a hope to develop new protocols for the treatment of infertility using paroxetine.
    Keywords: obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD), Infertility, selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs), paroxetine, successful pregnancy}
  • Emadouddin Moudi, Ali Akbar Kasaeeyan*
    Background
    Several recent studies have investigated the therapeutic role of phosphodiesterase type 5 (PDE5) inhibitors in premature ejaculation (PE) used in the treatment of erectile dysfunction.
    Objectives
    In the present research, the efficacy of paroxetine alone and paroxetine plus tadalafil was compared in patients referred because of premature ejaculation.Patients and
    Methods
    This quasi-experimental study was performed on 100 consecutive 17 to 49-year-old potent men with premature ejaculation and without any clear organic disease. All patients had lifelong PE with an intravaginal ejaculation latency time (IELT) shorter than 1.5 minutes. Informed consent was obtained from all patients who were randomly divided into two groups using a computer-generated random tabulation list. In group A, patients received 10 mg paroxetine daily, in addition to four hours before planned sexual activity. In group B, 10 mg paroxetine was taken daily, plus 10 mg tadalafil one hour before planned sexual activity. The duration of the intervention was six months and patients were evaluated for IELT three and six months after the beginning of therapy.
    Results
    The mean age of patients in groups A and B were 33 ± 9.6 and 31.2 ± 9.3 years, respectively (P = 0.368). The mean number of intercourses were 1.08 ± 0.6 and 1.12 ± 0.6 per week in groups A and B, respectively (P = 0.791). Mean IELT at the 3-month follow up in groups A and B was 4.5 ± 1.5 and 5 ± 2.4 minutes, respectively (P = 0.285) and at the 6-month follow up was 4.8 ± 1 and 5.3 ± 2 minutes, respectively (P = 0.278).
    Conclusions
    The results of the study show that tadalafil can increase the mean IELT and can be used for treatment of premature ejaculation in combination with paroxetine.
    Keywords: Premature Ejaculation, Serotonin Uptake Inhibitors, Paroxetine Tadalafil Plus Paroxetine, Paroxetine}
  • محمدرضا خدایی اردکانی، عماد ثنایی *، آرش میراب زاده، نرگس پورحیدری، ندا علی بیگی، محمدرضا شیخی
    مقدمه
    تریکوتیلومانیا یک اختلال کنترل تکانه کندن مو می باشد که منجر به از دست دادن واضح مو می شود. درمان های متعددی برای این اختلال پیشنهاد شده است ولی در مورد مقایسه اثر روش های درمانی، مطالعات به حد کافی وجود ندارند. این تحقیق با هدف مقایسه اثر درمانی فلووکسامین و پاروکستین در درمان بیماران مبتلا به تریکوتیلومانیا انجام شد.
    روش ها
    در این مطالعه 58 بیمار مراجعه کننده به درمانگاه روانپزشکی و پوست به صورت تصادفی در دو گروه درمان با پاروکستین و فلووکسامین قرار گرفتند. هر دو گروه قبل از شروع درمان، پرسشنامه استانداردNIMH)National Institute of Mental Health) را پر نموده و در گروه اول درمان با فلووکسامین و در گروه دوم درمان با پاروکستین انجام شد. در هر دو گروه پرسشنامه 4 هفته و 12 هفته پس از درمان تکمیل شد. از 58 بیماری که وارد مطالعه شدند،6 بیمار از ادامه مطالعه خارج گردیدند.
    یافته ها
    در گروه بیماران تحت درمان با فلووکسامین اثر درمانی در 12 هفته بیش از 4 هفته بود. در مورد درمان با پاروکستین اثرات درمان هم در 4 هفته (پس آزمون) و هم در 12 هفته (پیگیری) مشاهده شد. جهت تجزیه و تحلیل داده ها از آزمون آماری T مستقل و t-test Paired استفاده شد و سطح معنی داری در این مطالعه 05/ 0>P در نظر گرفته شد. داده ها با استفاده از نرم افزار SPSS v.20 مورد تجزیه و تحلیل قرار گرفت.
    نتیجه گیری
    در مقایسه دو روش درمانی اثرات درمانی فلووکسامین در 12 هفته مشاهده گردید. حال آن که در مورد پاروکستین هم در 4 هفته و هم در 12 هفته اثر درمانی حاصل شد. بیانگر آن است که بیماران تحت درمان با پاروکستین سریع تر از درمان سود می برند و در مجموع بیماران تحت درمان پاروکستین نتیجه درمانی بهتری نشان دادند.
    کلید واژگان: تریکوتیلومانیا, فلووکسامین, پاروکستین}
    Mr Khodaie Ardakani, E. Sanaei *, A. Mirabzadeh, N. Poorheidari, N. Alibaigi, Mr Sheikhi
    Introduction
    Trichotillomania is an impulse control disorder that leads to obvious hair loss. Several treatments are supposed to be effective but there are not enough data to compare effect of this treatment. The aim of this study is to compare effectiveness of treatment with Fluvoxamine vs. Paroxetine in patients with Trichotillomania.
    Methods
    in this study 58 patients were randomly assigned into two therapeutic groups of Paroxetine and Fluvoxamine treatments. National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH) questionnaire was translated into Persian and administered to both groups before the beginning of treatment and 4 weeks & 12 weeks after treatment; patients discontinued the treatment and left the study. Data analysis was done with independent T-test & paired T-test & the data were analyzed using SPSS-20 software.
    Results
    In the group of patients with Fluvoxamine treatment, Effectiveness of therapy in 12th week was greater than 4th week, whereas the effectiveness of treatment with Paroxetine was seen in both 4th week & 12th week after initiation of therapy and was more effective than fluvoxamine.
    Conclusion
    regarding the comparison of two therapeutic methods, the effect of Fluvoxamine was started in 12 weeks whereas the therapeutic effect for Paroxetine was both in 4 week & 12 weeks. This shows that patients with Paroxetine treatment responds more rapidly therefore have better therapeutic response.
    Keywords: Trichotillomania, Fluvoxamine, Paroxetine}
  • مالک زارعی، معصومه ثابت کسایی، ترانه معینی زنجانی
    مقدمه
    رسپتور P2X4 به عنوان یک رسپتور پورینرژیکی که در میکروگلیای فعال شده بیان می گردد، نقش کلیدی را درپاتوژنز درد نوروپاتیک بازی میکند. صدمه به عصب نخاعی باعث افزایش بیان ژن گیرنده P2X4 بر روی میکروگلیای فعال شده میگردد. همچنین مهار گیرنده P2X4 باعث کاهش درد نوروپاتیک میشود. هدف ازانجام این مطالعه بررسی اثر پاروکستین به عنوان یک مهار کننده گیرنده P2X4، برکاهش آلودینیا و هایپرآلژزیا بصورت پیشگیری کننده قبل از ایجاد ضایعه وهمچنین بعد ازاعمال ضایعه عصبی درعصب سیاتیک در مدل CCI بوده است.
    روش کار
    موش های نر نژاد ویستار (وزن بین 150 تا 200 گرم، تعداد 6عدد در هر گروه) به سه گروه مختلف تقسیم شدند: 1- گروه CCI-حامل، 2- گروه شم و 3- گروه CCI-پاروکستین. پاروکستین (10 mg/kg، IP) یکساعت قبل از ایجاد ضایعه عصبی تزریق و تا 14 روز ادامه داده شد. در قسمت دیگر این مطالعه 7 رور بعد از ایجاد ضایعه عصبی پاروکستین (10 mg/kg، IP) تزریق و تا روز 14 ادامه یافت. تارهای فون فری برای سنجش آلودینیای مکانیکی و دستگاه آنالژزی متر برای سنجش میزان هایپرآلژزیای حرارتی جهت انجام تست های رفتاری درد مورد استفاده قرار گرفتند.
    نتایج
    در تزریق دارو قبل از ایجاد ضایعه (پیشگیری)، پاروکستین توانست به طور قابل توجهی باعث کاهش آلودینیای مکانیکی و هایپرآلژزیای حرارتی گردد (P<0.001). در تزریق دارو یک هفته بعد از ایجاد ضایعه عصبی (درمان)، پاروکستین کاهش قابل توجهی در هایپرآلژزیای حرارتی (P<0.01) و آلودینیای مکانیکی (P<0.001) ایجاد نمود.
    نتیجه گیری
    به نظر می رسد که پاروکستین می تواند رفتار درد را به صورت پیشگیری کننده و همچنین بعد از ایجاد ضایعه عصبی در مدل فشردگی مزمن عصب کاهش دهد.
    کلید واژگان: پاروکستین, گیرنده P2X4, آلودینیا, هایپرآلژزیا}
    Malek Zarei, Masoumeh Sabetkasaei, Taraneh Moini Zanjani
    Background
    P2X4 receptor (P2X4R)، a purinoceptor expressed in activated spinal microglia، plays a key role in the pathogenesis of neuropathic pain. Spinal nerve injury induces up-regulation of P2X4R on activated microglia in the spinal cord، and blockade of this receptor can reduce neuropathic pain. The present study was undertaken to determine whether paroxetine، an inhibitor of P2X4R، could attenuate allodynia and hyperalgesia in chronic constriction injury (CCI) model of neuropathic pain when used preemptively or after the sciatic nerve injury.
    Methods
    Male Wistar rats (150-200 g، n = 6) were divided into 3 different groups: 1- CCI vehicle-treated group، 2- Sham group، and 3- CCI paroxetine-treated group. Paroxetine (10 mg/kg، i. p.) was administered 1 h before surgery and continued daily until day 14. In other part of the study، paroxetine (10 mg/kg، i. p.) was administered at day 7 post injury and continued daily until day 14. von Frey filaments for mechanical allodynia and analgesia meter for thermal hyperalgesia were used to assay pain behavior.
    Results
    In a preventive paradigm، paroxetine significantly attenuated both mechanical allodynia and thermal hyperalgesia (P<0. 001). A significant decrease in pain behavior was seen with paroxetine on existing allodynia (P<0. 001) and hyperalgesia (P<0. 01) when initiated at day 7 post injury.
    Conclusion
    It seems that paroxetine can attenuate pain behavior when administered before and also after sciatic nerve injury in CCI model of neuropathic pain.
    Keywords: Paroxetine, P2X4 receptor (P2X4R), Allodynia, Hyperalgesia}
  • Hosein Khedmatgozar, Behrooz Birashk, Hassan Ashayeri, Aliasghar Asgharnejad Farid
    Introduction
    Although the effectiveness of paroxetine and Attention Modification Program has been studied separately in treating social anxiety disorder, there has been no research comparing them according to the literature. The aim of this study was to compare the effectiveness of paroxetine, Attention Modification Program (AMP) and combination of both on improving the Social Anxiety Symptoms.
    Methods
    33 patients meeting DSM-IV-TR criteria for social anxiety disorder were randomly assigned in 3 groups: 11 in paroxetine group, 11 in AMP group and 11 in combined group. Treatment intervention was done during 8 weeks period. Social Phobia Inventory (SPIN), Beck Depression Inventory (BDI-II) and Sheehan Disability Scale (SDS) were administered before and after treatment intervention. One-way Analysis of Covariance (ANCOVA) was used to determine the differences and efficacy of treatment interventions between groups. Data analysis was done by SPSS-16 software.
    Results
    28 participants completed the treatment period. One-way ANCOVA results showed statistically significant differences in post-treatment scores of social phobia (p=0/007), depressive symptoms (p=0.007) and daily life functioning (p=0.011) between three groups. Bonferroni correction showed that combined treatment is significantly more effective than AMP in reducing social phobia symptoms (p=0.007), depressive symptoms (p=0.022) and enhancing daily life functioning (0.019). Yet, there were no significant differences between Paroxetine and combined treatment in all post-treatment scores (p=0.890, p=1.000, p=1.000 for social phobia, depressive symptoms and daily life functioning respectively). Paroxetine showed more significant improvement of depressive symptoms (p=0.016) and enhancing daily life functioning (p=0.045) than AMP. Also, there were no significant differences between paroxetine and AMP in reducing social anxiety symptoms.
    Discussion
    It seems that paroxetine has wider effect in reducing social anxiety symptoms, depressive symptoms and enhancing daily life functioning than AMP and adding the AMP to paroxetine does not make significant changes than medicating with paroxetine alone.
    Keywords: Paroxetine, Attention Modification Program, Social Anxiety, Social phobia}
  • سعید عباسی ملکی، مرتضی ثمینی، وهاب باباپور
    زمینه و هدف
    افزایش مقدار دوپامین در هسته آکومبنس یک نقش کلیدی در اثرات پاداشی و تقویت کننده مثبت داروهای مورد سو مصرف ایفا می کند. از طرف دیگر، سروتونین سبب تسهیل آزادسازی دوپامین در مغز می شود. هدف این مطالعه، بررسی مصرف هم زمان آمانتادین و پاروکستین بر اثر تقویت کننده مثبت مورفین در مدل رجحان مکان شرطی در موش سوری می باشد.
    روش بررسی
    در این مطالعه تجربی از موش های سوری نر آلبینو نژاد (20 الی 30 گرم) استفاده شد. در این بررسی تست 6 روزه متوالی؛ مشتمل بر سه فاز پیش شرطی، شرطی شدن و بعد شرطی شدن انتخاب گردید. در روز اول بعد از برداشتن دیوارهای کشویی مدت زمان اقامت حیوان در سه بخش جعبه CPP به مدت 10 دقیقه ثبت گردید. بعد از مشخص شدن مکان کم تر ترجیحی و بیشتر ترجیحی، موش ها طی روزهای دوم و چهارم در بخش کم تر ترجیحی به صورت داخل صفاقی مورفین را با دوز 5 میلی لیتر به ازای هر کیلوگرم دریافت نموده و در روزهای سوم و پنجم در بخش بیشتر ترجیحی، نرمال سالین را با دوز 10 میلی لیتر به ازای هر کیلوگرم دریافت کردند. در روز تست یا فاز بعد شرطی شدن، موش ها به جای مورفین، آمانتادین، پاروکستین یا هر دوی آن ها را دریافت نمودند. گروه کنترل به جای داروهای مذکور نرمال سالین دریافت کردند.
    یافته ها
    نتایج حاصله نشان داد که مورفین در مقایسه با گروه شاهد و به صورت وابسته به دوز (5/2، 5 و10 میلی گرم به ازای هر کیلوگرم) به طور معنی داری (P<0.001) سبب القای CPP گردید. گروهی هم که آمانتادین دریافت نمودند (2.5، 5 و 10 میلی گرم به ازای هر کیلوگرم) فقط دوز 5 و 10 آن در مقایسه با گروه شاهد، به طور معنی داری (به ترتیب P<0.01 و P<0.001) سبب القای CPP شد. پاروکستین در تمام دوزهای مورد مطالعه (5، 10 و 20) سبب القای CPP گردید. مصرف هم زمان آمانتادین و پاروکستین (هر دو با دوز10 میلی گرم به ازای هر کیلوگرم) در مقایسه با گروه شاهد به طور معنی داری سبب تقویت CPP شبه مورفینی شدند (P<0.001).
    نتیجه گیری
    داروهای مختلفی که سبب آزادسازی دوپامین در مغز یا افزایش سروتونین می شوند یا با مصرف هم زمان داروهای این دو دسته که باعث تشدید رجحان مکان شرطی شبه مورفینی می شوند، احتمالا می توانند در کاهش برخی علایم محرومیت ناشی از مورفین مورد استفاده قرار گیرند.
    کلید واژگان: آمانتادین, پاروکستین, مورفین, اثر تقویت کننده مثبت, رجحان مکان شرطی, موش سوری}
    Sa Maleki *, M. Samini, V. Babapour
    Background And Objective
    Increased level of dopamine in accumbens nucleus has a key role in the rewarding effects or positive reinforcement of abused drugs, whereas serotonin facilitates dopamine release in brain. The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of concurrent use of amantadine and paroxetine on reinforcing effect of morphine in conditioned place preference model in mice.
    Materials And Methods
    In this experimental study male NMRI mice (20-30 g) were used within 6 consecutive days including preconditioning, conditioning and postconditioning phases. On the first day, after removal of the partitions, time spent in every 3 compartments was measured for 10 minutes. After determination of low and high preferred side, animals received morphine sulfate (5 mg/kg) intraperitoneally on the 2nd and 4th days in the least preferred side, but on the 3rd and 5th days of the test, animals received saline (10ml/kg) in high preferred side. On the test day or postconditioning phase, animals received amantadine, and paroxetine alone or their concurrent does, instead of morphine. Control group received saline in both sides (n = 8).
    Results
    Our results show that morphine significantly and dose dependently (2.5, 5,10 mg/kg) induced CPP (P<0.001). Amantadine, only in doses of 5 and 10 mg /kg (P<0.01, P<0.001, respectively) induced CPP. Paroxetine induced CPP in all doses. Concurrent use of amantadine(10mg/kg) and paroxetine (10mg/kg) significantly enhances morphine - like CPP (P <0.001).
    Conclusion
    Concurrent use of drugs, releases dopamine and inhibit reuptake of serotonin, and may potentiate morphine-like CPP and could be useful in decreasing some opioid withdrawal signs.
    Keywords: Amantadine, Paroxetine, Morphine, Positive reinforcement, Conditioned place preference}
نکته
  • نتایج بر اساس تاریخ انتشار مرتب شده‌اند.
  • کلیدواژه مورد نظر شما تنها در فیلد کلیدواژگان مقالات جستجو شده‌است. به منظور حذف نتایج غیر مرتبط، جستجو تنها در مقالات مجلاتی انجام شده که با مجله ماخذ هم موضوع هستند.
  • در صورتی که می‌خواهید جستجو را در همه موضوعات و با شرایط دیگر تکرار کنید به صفحه جستجوی پیشرفته مجلات مراجعه کنید.
درخواست پشتیبانی - گزارش اشکال