Preference the right of the accused on Intermediary's right in he International Criminal Court
Author(s):
Abstract:
Balancing the rights of the accused and Intermediary on the International Criminal Court is one of the serious challenges of Thomas lubanga Dyilo. The primitive branch prefers the accused's rights on Intermediary's right and even pays its heavy price by staying procedure until the Prosecutor also prefer the accused's right over other their tasks. But Prosecutor feel this precedent for Intermediary's security and the possibility of future collaboration stopping in risky International Criminal Court cases and to observe the requirements of a fair trial about accused without the impact. The Appeals Branch is also without evaluating the accused's or Intermediary right's priority over another, only criticize hardliner of primitive branch in staying proceedings and disobedience of prosecutor from the Court's orders and ruled to continue the procedure. Hence the Appeals Branch with his silence, does not offer any vision in giving priority to the rights of the accused on the Intermediary or balancing in other trials in the International Criminal Court.
Keywords:
Language:
Persian
Published:
The Judiciary Law Journal, Volume:80 Issue: 96, 2017
Pages:
155 to 172
https://magiran.com/p1666511
مقالات دیگری از این نویسنده (گان)
-
Ruling on Jurisdiction in the Myanmar Situation and its Results in The ICC’s Jurisprudence
*
Journal of Criminal Law Reserch,