Legislation in the field of art

Legislation - making general, generic and imperative rules- is of aspects of governance, and governments use this tool to regulate social relations as well as to achieve their goals, intentions, and ideals. The question that arises is whether art can also be the subject of legislation? And if the answer is positive, how far is this range of generic rules to be made?
In the sphere of artistic legislation, we must accept that the principle is based on the non-interference of the state in the establishment of rules unless the expedient of intervening for this society would be more than the loss of avoiding the sovereignty to interfere in this issue, as the legislature must accept that the areas of "freedom" in art should be wider than the controlled domains and these legislative restrictions on art should not be such as to be the case of this principle "Particularizing of the most is evil."
In the scope of the entry of the sovereignty for legislation in the subject of art, some principles also should be accepted by legislative institutions, including the fact that legislating of art must be more reliant on "support", and the legislative support aspects must be much enough, and the "post-control" principle in art must minimize he prior art controls as far as possible, and according to the principle of "flexibility", the field of art is not worthy of rigid and non-flexible laws. Also, based on the principle of audition, artists' "participation" in the making, interpretation, and implementation of laws is crucial, especially in the stage of the legislative initiative, where non-participation of artists can challenge the relevant law.