Islamic Jurisprudential Principles of Istizlal for Mohrem Men under Iztiraar from the Perspective of Five Schools of Islamic Thoughts

Istizlal for mohrem men (consecrated pilgrims) under Iztiraar (restlessness) and its islamic jurisprudential principles in terms of defining law (al-hukm al-Taklifi) and declaratory laws (ahkam al-wad'i) are subjects required to be explored from the perspective of the jurisprudence of Islamic schools. If Iztiraar ensues, a mohrem man can use a canopy but the atonement must be paid for, whether the action is taken on one’s own volition. The critical difference between volition and Iztiraar lies in the act of willing one commits sin; however, the perpetrator under Iztiraar is not entitled to retributions. The sanctity Abjection (Tazleel) assigns to an individual with reasonable capability, not to one who lacks ability to accomplish usual practices under urgent conditions such as illness, coldness, and so forth. The current study aims to explicate Istizlal under Iztiraar from the perspective of the five schools of Islamic thoughts (mazahib). However, the research presents an analysis of such newly-discussed issues as Istizlal and its subjectology from the perspective of the Islamic sects which have not been broadly discussed in the literature of this field.