A critical view of the usurping institution's strict policy and the need for accountability (Based on the quality of the nutrient element involved).
Author(s):
Article Type:
Research/Original Article (دارای رتبه معتبر)
Abstract:
Respect for property is one of the legal rules of law, and unlawful domination or unjust harm will render the offender liable. The intentional look and the importance of safeguarding the financial rights of individuals in the community and ensuring their rights in this area has led the legislator to adopt rigorous policies in the field, one of which is the crystallization of the rule of crystallization. Has found. As to the validity of this rule (relative to the ignorant or ignorant ruler), at least two competing currents of absolutism can be deduced from Imamiyah, Sunni, and Iranian law: In one sense, this rule is completely invalid and, with the new principles of civil liability The conflict is obvious. On the other hand, the validity of this rule is a matter of jurisprudence and law and its social necessities are backed. This descriptive-analytical study shows that in analyzing this rule one should choose the middle way and based on the presence or absence of a good intent element in the unauthorized occupant, a proper and proper conduit for the flow of the rule. The phenomena in which Sunni jurisprudence has been traced back to it have referred to the judgmental
Keywords:
Language:
Persian
Published:
Journal of Private Law, Volume:9 Issue: 33, 2021
Pages:
189 to 219
https://magiran.com/p2264934
مقالات دیگری از این نویسنده (گان)
-
Analyzing the Jurisprudential Foundations of Warranty (ḍamān) in Damages Caused by the Use of Industrial Products with Standard Marks
Zeinab Sanchooli *, Mohammadreza Kaykha
Jurisprudence and the Fundaments of Islamic Law, -
The Invalidity of Khabar al-Wāḥid as Restricted to the Transactions and Contracts
Mohammadreza Kaykha *, Hamid Moazzeni-Bistgani
The Research Journal Fighi & Usuli Research,