Providing a model for institutionalizing and reviewing the current status of teamwork in the General Welfare Office of Fars Province

In governmental and non-governmental organizations today, the concept is always reflected that not only individual abilities and talents are not enough to achieve goals, but also an important principle that people can work together and in the form of various work teams. Also, finding creative and new solutions to complex problems is becoming more difficult every day, so the purpose of this study was to provide a model for institutionalizing and examining the current state of teamwork in the General Welfare Department of Fars Province. The research method was combined. The statistical population in the qualitative section includes experts of the Welfare Organization in relation to teamwork and scientific experts of related professors in the field of teamwork and experts and the statistical population in the quantitative section of all senior and middle managers and employees of the General Department of Welfare of Fars Province 207 people Was. Sampling method the qualitative part of the sampling was purposeful, a number of scientific experts and professional experts were selected as a sample by the researcher, and in-depth interviews were conducted with them. Cochran's formula was used to obtain a small sample size. From the total population, 135 people were selected as the sample size, which were randomly selected as the share categories of each deputy and finally selected by simple random method. For qualitative analysis, thematic analysis and content analysis were used. Data analysis and testing of hypotheses related to the components of the model and testing of the whole research model were performed using the data data method and one-sample t-test, respectively. Research based on a research model consisting of five dimensions and 37 components showed, Institutionalizing teamwork in the General Department of Welfare in Fars province in all dimensions and components of the model (including causal conditions, contextual conditions, interventionist conditions, strategies and consequences) lower It was moderate.