Criteria and effects of separating judicial action from administrative action of judges and judicial managers of the judiciary

The exercise of sovereignty, in terms of purpose, is divided into political acts of coercion, and in terms of content and nature, into legislative, judicial and executive acts. In the meantime, In addition to the activities of the executive branch, the activities of the legislature and the judiciary are not of a purely legislative or judicial nature and may also involve administrative action. In the judiciary, judges and judicial managers, in addition to carrying out judicial action, also in some cases perform administrative actions. Accordingly, we are looking for answers to these questions: What are the criteria and criteria for separating judicial actions from administrative actions of judges and judicial managers? Also, what are the effects of this separation, and moreover, if judges or managers of the judiciary take administrative action that ignores and violates the rights and freedoms of individuals, what capacities are there in the law to prevent and seek redress? In the meantime, we will focus on the fact that in the light of the rule of law, all administrative acts must be subject to administrative and judicial oversight, and no action must go beyond oversight