Features of Educational Sciences Textbook Published by SAMT Organization; content analysis of the experts’ critiques

One of the fundamental tasks of the Organization for Researching and Composing University textbooks in Humanities (SAMT) is Authorship and official translation of basic reference source, however, reviewing the evidence have shown there is a significant research gap in its published work of educational science (not as the individual book) despite three decades of its life. The present study aims to examine this gap by employing content analysis. The statistical population comprised all the SAMT published books of educational science before 2016 that 33 books have chosen by subjective sampling. The text-books review checklist of the council of humanities literature review and planning was our research tool. Every book has reviewed critically by two expert faculty members who also completed the given checklist. This study, in general, demonstrated that at least 70 percent of experts believed SAMT’s books in educational science are well-organized in respect of resources accredit index, accurate referencing, trusteeship, objectivity, clear writing, fluency, precise equivalent, logical order of every chapter, and the whole text as well as typography, layout, and binding. Therefore, these indexes could consider as the strengths of SAMT educational science publications. After all, results represented that 30 percent of these books were poor in terms of the updated resources index, content comprehensiveness, and analysis quality. This figure was even higher in the form index. According to the results, there have been suggestions for improving literature quality.