An introduction to the arguments of those who agree with the concept of condition in the light of the monopoly of causality

One of the opposite concepts is the concept of condition, which has a special place among the topics of the words of the science of principles, and due to its importance and frequency compared to other concepts, It has always been the subject of discussion among scholars of the science of principles. In the present study, the indication of the conditional theorem to the concept has been studied in a descriptive-critical way. In this study, after explaining the location of the dispute, while unprecedentedly reviewing the arguments and evidences of those who agree with the concept of condition with the focus on well-known principled schools and assigning the discussion to "causal monopoly" which is the most popular way to prove the concept of condition, about ten aspects are mentioned. After new categorization and standardizing arguments and their critique, most of the arguments have been distorted. Then the reliance on the application ( etlagh) of the main clause (jaza), which is sound and safe from the defects of other evidences, is presented as a new way to prove the exclusivity of the cause from one of the scholars of the principles with an explanation by the author. This seems to be the most efficient way to prove the concept, and according to it, the concept of the condition is proved.