Analyzing the Non-Contractual Commitments’ Economic Manifestations in Imāmiyyeh Jurisprudence and Iran’s Laws

The law scholars have been seeking, especially in the area of commitments, to enact verdicts that support the individuals’ ownership. The results of supporting ownership in the laws of contracts have been theories like will’s governance and contract’s adulation and, in the extra-contractual requirements, efforts for restoring the victim into a prior state. The veneration of ownership in the course of time caused the accumulation of capital by the individuals and, resultantly, the impression of the economic theories on the science of law. The economic theories are so rooted in the domain of the commitments that they give rise to the emergence of theories like the contract’s administration against its adulation in the laws of contracts and the instrumentalist theories in the non-contractual commitments. The acceptance of the economic phenomena as a legal challenge caused the issues like contract moderation, buoyant price and/or the option-related provisions such as the option of refusal to be looked at from a new perspective. In the present article, the author intends to analyze the single article “about the elimination of invasion and compensation of losses imposed to properties” as well as the note 3 to article 8 of the law on “the compulsory insurance of the losses caused to third persons as a result of the accidents stemming from vehicles” as examples that are completely influenced by the economic conditions and are apparently against the preliminary legal regulations meanwhile dealing with the foresaid important challenge.