A Critique of Word Choosing and the Literature of Commercial Law

Humans communicate with each other through words and convey the message to the audience, in principle, words are understood by customary meanings. In the case of non-compliance with this principle, communication will confront problems, simultaneously the convey of meanings will face difficulties, and understanding the objectives will not be simply possible. Whereas the legislature aims to adopt regulations to regulate social relations, it is expected that the legislature observes the minimal principles of literature not only for choosing the words but for the way of writing them. In this study, the descriptive-analytical method is used and this question is examined that to what extent the Electronic Commerce Law has succeeded in using words and observing the fundamental principles of literature. Despite the significance of the Law, it seems that the legislator has not been succeeded in applying the rules and principles of writing. In particular, the failure is evident in the section of definitions, since some words are selected which seem pleonasm, and some words are defined which in part have an obvious meaning. Due to the weakness in passing the concepts on, in some parts of the Law the basic principles of literature are not used properly.