A Comparative Study of the Normative and Discourse Conflicts of the Islamic Human Rights System with the European Human Rights System

With the end of World War II and the considerable amount of human suffering left, human rights became one of the most important common norms of the contemporary international system, and all international actors sought to establish institutions at the regional level in addition to creating common global norms. Through it, they can also legislate to uphold local human rights norms. In the meantime, European countries, in the form of their fledgling institutionalisms, sought to institutionalize them extensively and chose human rights as the cornerstone of their foreign policy. The Islamic world, in the form of the Organization of Islamic Cooperation, has established the normative system of Islamic human rights.However, due to differences in epistemological and ontological foundations in the formulation of these human rights systems, we are witnessing normative conflicts between the West and the Islamic world, and the West is trying to use human rights as a tool to put pressure on Islamic countries.This study seeks to investigate the commonalities and differences in Islamic and European normative systems by using a comparative method. Accordingly, in addition to enumerating the human rights norms emphasized by the parties, the researcher examines the shaping causes of these conflicts. Finally, it offers solutions to the human rights challenge