The Examination of William James’s Verbal Argument that Intuition cannot be Explained

Evidences show that the theory of the unexplained does not include propositions of intuitions in the Islamic mysticism. This paper has been authored in the course of the examination of William James’s argument for the unexplained. His argument owes to al-Ghazali phrases according to which James considers Islamic mysticism under the theory of the unexplained. In the process of his research, the author has come across two points: first that the backgrounds of mystical propositions would be clearer for the truth-seekers; second after discovering those backgrounds such as the opponent’s specific social and political preconditions and linguistic constraints, we may devise a precise method for realizing the truths. The words of Muslim mystics and researchers have been taken into consideration in order to demonstrate that this theory is not valid. The method adopted for this paper is phenomenological and structuralist.