The role of criminal intervention in bankruptcy verdictions and collection of bank claims

Ordinary bankruptcy rulings have become a new way for large debtors to getaway from the payment of claims because of supporting aspects.. Although criminal bankruptcy rulings reduce claims, bank claims have not diminished since criminal convictions do not apply to legal entities. This article uses a descriptive-analytical method to examine the rules and its role in increasing claims as a result of fraudulent actions of bank debtors in receiving a bankruptcy order without worrying about receiving a criminal sentence. The result of this article is that by reviewing the existing regulations and differential criminal policy against white-collar crimes compared to the crimes of ordinary people and by using criminal judicial policies such as issuing unanimous votes, a new procedure to prevent criminal bankruptcy crimes can lead to better results in this fielld.